Category Archives: Human Endogenous Retrovirus – HERV

HPV, The Virus That Doesn’t Cause Cancer – New Video – Liam Scheff and Robert Scott Bell at the Health Freedom Expo

Liam Scheff and Robert Scott Bell present “HPV, The Virus that Doesn’t Cause Cancer” at the Health Freedom Expo in March 2012. Liam Scheff, author of Official Stories, presents the history of bad cancer ‘virology’ that led to the rotten ideas infesting science today; a lousy science that gave us “HPV, the virus that does (but doesn’t) cause cancer,” and the idea that every disease of poverty and immune deficiency in poor people is caused by a single particle. And we laugh a bit along the way….

Read more in “Official Stories”

HIV Test Fraud Liberation Day

by Liam Scheff
for the Robert Scott Bell Show and Natural News

It may come as a shock to realize that if everyone in the world who was supposed to be HIV positive, suddenly no longer cared about this designation, and returned the diagnosis and red ribbon to the doctor or clinician who gave it to them, that no further infections would occur, no HIV would be spread, and the entire notion of this virus would disappear entirely. What would be left in this scenario is not a world plagued by HIV infection, but a world in which many people are ill for many reasons: Poverty, pharmaceutical poisoning, street drug abuse, toxic environmental poisoning, pure starvation, filthy parasite-ridden water and fear. A fear promulgated and propagated by the AIDS medical front.

We on the Robert Scott Bell Show are proud to present a new video documentary release from the “House of Numbers” special edition film series – “HIV Testing Exposed, Revealed and Deconstructed.”


What are HIV tests? What do they do?

They are protein tests – they look for reactions between proteins in the test kits, and proteins in your blood.

But where do the proteins come from? The answer will astound, and possibly liberate you, and anyone you know who has ever been given one of these fraudulent tests.

In the course of two hours, we hear from AIDS industry and medical experts, who in their own words reveal in no uncertain terms that HIV tests are a complete and utter fraud – a game of three-card-monty, that overlay a cult-like belief system, a myth – the myth that AIDS is a transmissible sex disease.

AIDS – acquired immune deficiency – is real enough, and easy to ‘acquire’ through many means – through drug, pharma, water, food poisoning; through prolonged intoxication with chemicals, or restriction of essential nutrients.

But while immune deficiency is quite real, HIV is entirely fake. Does this statement surprise you? Shock you? In the course of two hours, investigative journalist Liam Scheff, and host Robert Scott Bell will walk you through the experts on parade, as they tell you, in their own words, how the HIV test was constructed out of entirely normal proteins, that occur in both sick and healthy people. These proteins were supposed to come from one virus – but they come from a witch’s brew of cultured, contaminated cell lines in government laboratories, which had been growing for most of the 1970s. They were useless proteins looking for an illness to attach themselves to. Why? To keep the funding going.

The CDC was saved from destitution by the invention of the “HIV” paradigm. The World Health Organization has grown into a world policing, economic weapon of war, in light of their ability to ruin nations with make-believe “HIV” tests, (and the SARS, Bird and Swine flu tests that followed suit). Much of the ‘third world’ has been made into pharma slave states, because we have been given this profoundly effective myth: That sex is dangerous for some people, and so they must be tested.

But what are we testing them with, and what for?

You will hear Hans Gelderblom, electron microscopist, admit on camera that what became HIV tests, was from the beginning, “Eighty Percent Dirt.” You will hear Ph.D. researchers describe the invention (by fiat, and consensus agreement) of “HIV proteins,” out of normally-occuring cellular proteins. And you will hear the high priests of “HIV,” Robert Gallo, Luc Montagnier and their peers, describe HIV tests as entirely flawed Rube Goldberg devices – one leading to another, leading to another, all in an attempt to create an overwhelming conclusion that a dozen useless tests must be more meaningful than just one.

When they know the truth: A dozen times a fraud is an even more profound fraud – and this fraud is now being perpetrated against Africans, Indians, Chinese, Eastern and Western Europeans, South and North Americans, and citizens worldwide, with entirely disgraced ‘rapid tests,’ now used in vans and at folding tables in parking lots, to grab the poorly-educated and hurl them into the pharmaceutical maw.

On World AIDS Day, we at the Robert Scott Bell show declare a worldwide moratorium on HIV testing — you can now download this show, and the House of Numbers exclusive HIV testing video, walk it into your clinician, your doctor, your school, workplace, your CEO or C.O.’s office; bring it to social studies, science and math classes, discourse and debate clubs; post them on your webpage and blogs, burn them onto CDs and MP3 players, and spread the word.

Turn in your HIV test result. Return it to the manufacturer. After all, they’ll tell you in the fine print that it is a ‘diagnosis’ with no value at all. And begin to reclaim your life, sanity, and your sexual identity – it is not the government’s right or responsibility to decide for you how you shall choose a partner, nor how you shall be drugged.

Take this information, and spread the well-described and understood reality of HIV testing: It is an absolute, irredeemable  fraud. And if you are ill, and have any kind of immune deficiency, your challenge is to slowly but concretely educate yourself about the illnesses that plague us in our modern world. Illnesses of toxic exposure, from denatured and chemically altered food, polluted water and air, and chronic exposure to gut-rending pharmaceuticals.

We on the Robert Scott Bell show will continue to talk about how to recover from immune deficiency. It is a challenge for all of us. What we need to do for the innocent victims of the HIV test fraud, is to NULLIFY that false label, and let them have the mental space and sanity to pursue health without being chased by the pharma nightmare that is daily inflicted upon so-called “AIDS patients.”

This is going to be a two hours like no other we’ve done. We will plumb the depths of the HIV testing fraud, and let the mainstream, in their own words, describe it to you, and release you from it.

Join us today at 12pm EST, and then downloadable for your MP3 player, on for World HIV Fraud Day.

And spread the word, by sharing the broadcast and the “House of Numbers” documentary with everyone you know, at every level of professional life in your town, village or burg, wherever you live in the world.

Join us to listen, and later click on the Robert Scott Bell archives link for the show download.

And remember – the power to heal truly is yours. And the power to turn in your HIV diagnosis, belongs to you, today.




The Mainstream Again Admits – HIV Does Not Exist as a Unique Particle

by Liam Scheff

Dear voyagers of dark and dusky paths; of shattered highways, of broken dreams. Wilkommen!

How good it is to see you in the old haunt, reading the medical journals, looking for clues this Century’s greatest lie (well, since 2001 we’re competing with some whoppers…but).

Have a stroll through this mainstream review of all things retroviral nonsense. This paper provides a basis of understanding the AIDS mess deeply from their point of view (the point of view of bad science in many labs reaching consensus agreement).

So, please read along. Take your time. Take some dramamine, if needed, or ginger tea. Many of the leaps of logic will induce vertigo… [cached]

Understanding AIDS theory goes like this:

A. It is a sexually transmitted particle – Yes or No.

B. It or They Kill T-Cells – Yes or No.

C. It is a Distinct particle with a distinct shape, size, (morphology) and physical characteristic – Yes or No.

(Why? because that’s (supposedly) how infectious particles in the body are supposed to work – like jigsaw puzzle pieces. The need a particular size, and physical features to do their jobs).

For “A”, see Padian, see this:

175 couples. Doing it. In, out, up, down, front, back, six years of study time (plus all that came before): Zero ‘conversions.’ No negs became pos. Why? Because they weren’t shooting drugs – meaning, they didn’t raise their antibody count to a rancorous level, so as to tick off the touchy non-specific antibody tests.

For B?

Easy. See the mainstream’s defense of how they can’t figure out if/how anything is even remotely affecting T-Cells. Read “The Happy Exosome.”

From the inception of the paradigm in 1984, to the present, the answer is the same: “We don’t know, but keep sending money”:

•  “We are still very confused about the mechanisms that lead to CD4 T-cell depletion, but at least now we are confused at a higher level of understanding.” — Dr. Paul Johnson, Harvard Medical School (Balter 1997)

•  “We still do not know how, in vivo, the virus destroys CD4+ T cells…. Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the loss of CD4+ T cells, some of which seem to be diametrically opposed.” — Joseph McCune, immunologist (McCune 2001)

•  “Despite considerable advances in HIV science in the past 20 years, the reason why HIV-1 infection is pathogenic is still debated… There is a general misconception that more is known about HIV-1 than about any other virus and that all of the important issues regarding HIV-1 biology and pathogenesis have been resolved. On the contrary, what we know represents only a thin veneer on the surface of what needs to be known.” — Mario Stevenson, virologist (Nature Medicine 2003)

•  “Twenty-five years into the HIV epidemic, a complete understanding of what drives the decay of CD4 cells – the essential event of HIV disease – is still lacking…. The puzzle of HIV pathogenesis keeps getting more pieces added to it.” — W. Keith Henry, Pablo Tebas, and H. Clifford Lane (Henry 2006)

So, it’s still a “puzzle” to the mainstream. Do T-Cells die when in the presence of “HIV” DNA? (Which is always different!) No. Or, “We’re confused at a much higher level of understanding” is the official answer.

For question C? That’s what this is about…See below. See this – with pictures even. No distinct shape or size.

1. There is no single thing called “HIV” (“it” is never the same, because “it” is a “they” – and they knew it from the start) – The crap we’re finding is “Extremely Variable.”

“Every ‘isolated’ strain was different from the other also when obtained from the same individual but at different times.”

Is that a particle? No, it’s a fishing expedition with genetic re-assembling (later PCR), and culturing techniques. They call different things by one name. Have a glance:

“The ground for the feud was the following. Montagnier sent his first isolate LAV/BRU to Gallo in July of 1983. In May of 1984 Gallo’s coworker Sarngadharan brings one of Gallo’s five HIV strains (HTLV-IIIB) that grew well in a continuous cell line to Montagniers laboratory in Paris. In July of 1984 Montagnier sends Gallo a second sample of LAVBRU since Gallo had complained that the first didn’t grew well at NIH. Gallo then found and reported[33] that HIV was extremely variable; every isolated strain was different from the other also when obtained from the same individual but at different times. “ — Genomic diversity of the acquired immune deficiency syndrome virus HTLV-III: different viruses exhibit greatest divergence in their envelope genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Jul;82(14):4813-7.

Right. Get it? Nothing is ever the same? Even when it’s the same thing?

“Converging lines of research have linked human T-cell lymphotropic virus type III (HTLV-III) to the pathogenesis of the acquired immune deficiency syndrome. A characteristic feature of this virus is its genomic heterogeneity, which occurs to varying degrees in different viral isolates.” – Hahn BH, Gonda MA, Shaw GM, Popovic M, Hoxie JA, Gallo RC, Wong-Staal F.

Right! It’s always different! (Wrong. It’s not the same bloody thing, you bleeping morons). What they’re doing is fishing out different bits of genetic stuff from the ‘redundant’ genome – they used to call it ‘junk DNA,’ now it’s ‘important epi-genetic DNA,’ now it’s “exosomal DNA.”

Here’s how that works:

2. Highly Variable – Because “HIV” is not a Single Entity. “It” is a “They,” and “They” are HERVS or Now, “Exosomes”:

H-I-V is really H-E-R-V

AIDS researchers have been forced to admit time and again that their “HIV” is morphologically identical to “HIV-like particles” they find in “HIV negative persons.” This is true even though their “HIV” has the bad habit of having no standard size or physical quality – it can be too small or too large, and still be “HIV” to determined true-believing AIDS researchers.

This is why AIDS patients can “suppress” or stop the production of “HIV” by taking Selenium and other pro-methylating micronutrients. Why? Because returning cells to healthy levels of methyl production is good for bringing order back to loose and disordered DNA. Methylation stops or slows the production of these transposable elements. These are mistakenly thought of as “viruses,” but “HIV” is “LAV,” which is and always was human endogenous retroviral expression in stressed and damaged cells.

And this is at least part of the reason why HIV tests are so lousy.* Humans and animals produce HERVs under stress and illness, and so “HIV tests” are really “HERV tests,” and react with proteins produced by people who are suffering from almost any illness, drug abuse, vaccination, or, of course, pregnancy – because HERVs are expressed like wildfire in the placenta. *(The other reason is because Gallo’s HIV test slurry came from so many different people, mixed with so many different chemical and biological elements, it’s really impossible to know what they’re testing for).

John p. moore of aidstruth.orgFinally, this is why “HIV” (LAV or HTLV) doesn’t kill T-Cells. This has been the central claim of the AIDS paradigm – but it was proven false from the start. Robert Gallo invented the idea of slow T-Cell depletion by a scavenging, ravaging retrovirus in order to package his product with enough fear and anxiety, covered by pseudo-scientific technobabble, so pure belief would make it stick. Gallo sold his mixed cells containing HERVs (or HTLV-III, which was both as functionless and fraudulent as his other “human lymphotropic viruses”) to Abbott Labs. But he sold them in…ready? T-Cells. His “HIV” Grows in T-Cells. It’s called an ‘eternal line’ of production, in T-Cell leukemia. It never dies. Because HERVs don’t kill T-Cells.

Do you know what does cause T-Cells to suffer? De-methylation of DNA by exposure to pharmaceuticals and toxins.

3. What Kind of ‘Virus’ is ‘HIV’? It’s as many as they need it to be. A type-C a type-D, etc.

It’s supposed to be a “C.” Or. Well. Here, in Jay Levy’s lab, it’s a “D”:

Isolation of lymphocytopathic retroviruses from San Francisco patients with AIDS.

Levy JA, Hoffman AD, Kramer SM, Landis JA, Shimabukuro JM, Oshiro LS.


Infectious retroviruses have been detected in 22 of 45 randomly selected patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) and in other individuals from San Francisco. The AIDS-associated retroviruses (ARV) studied in detail had a type D morphology, Mg2+-dependent reverse transcriptase, and cytopathic effects on lymphocytes. The viruses can be propagated in an established adult human T cell line, HUT-78. They cross-react with antiserum to the lymphadenopathy-associated retrovirus isolated from AIDS patients in France. Antibodies to ARV were found in all 86 AIDS patients and in a high percentage of 88 other homosexual men in San Francisco. This observation indicates the widespread presence of these lymphocytopathic retroviruses and their close association with AIDS.

But for everybody else, it was a “B.” No, a “C.” No. Well… nobody really knew. Or cared.

If they could outsmart themselves, they could certainly outsmart the public.

Let’s Look at the Numbers:

From their mouths to your ears: 22 out of 45 ‘AIDS’ patients have ‘infectious retroviruses.’ Pardon? Where’s the 100 percent correlation for infection? Answer – they don’t care. It’s never to be found.

Where do the proteins come from? They were and are Propagated (grown, made) in an adult HUMAN T-CELL LINE.

What is “HIV” supposed to do?

Kill T-Cells.

Where does the mainstream GROW ‘immortal’ lines of ‘HIV?’

In T-Cells.

Can we all go home now, and get on with our humping?

Back to their numbers…

Antibodies to this ‘specific, never-the-same’ retroid were found in … 86 AIDS patients and in a high percentage of 88 other homosexual men.

Good news. I guess you can find it anywhere…

4. Don’t Worry About “HIV”Bothering Anyone…It’s “Fragile”

“HIV is an enveloped virus and hence fragile. Most certainly they had lost the virus envelope in their purification of the virus.”

You can find the Perth researchers citing AIDS theory originator, Robert Gallo, saying that MOST lose their envelopes AFTER or DURING budding. So it’s all a very, very fragile soup of non-uniform, never-the-same crap. Poor dears! I bet they cried during “Girl, Interrupted.” (I surely did).

“In the same issue of Science where Montagnier and his colleagues published their study Gallo pointed out that “the viral envelope which is required for infectivity is very fragile, it tends to come off when the virus buds from infected cells, thus rendering the particles incapable of infecting new cells”. Because of this Gallo claimed that “cell-to-cell contact may be required for retroviral infection”. — Marx JL. Human T-cell virus linked to AIDS.” Science 1983;220:806-809.


But, what’s this? A Cure Already! Way back in the Eighties!

Gallo also said, years ago (and this was new to me) that AIDS was curable with ‘chemokines’:

“Gallo brings more than his reputation. He already has several promising projects on the fast track. Last fall, he identified what he called chemokines — naturally occurring molecules that suppress HIV in vitro. These could prove a powerful treatment for AIDS. He’s following up on the vaccine research of Jonas Salk and Daniel Zagury, and trying to develop a “vector vaccine,” one that uses the smallpox virus to deliver particles that might trigger an immune response against HIV. He’s developing a treatment for Kaposi’s sarcoma, the deadly skin cancer seen in many AIDS patients.

Any of these paths could lead to a blockbuster product. “AIDS will soon drive the whole biotechnology field,” Gallo predicts. “It will be worth ten times ten our efforts here.”

Good news, because the redoubtable wikipodium says that they are ‘found in all vertabrates,’ so I guess the spinal column has cured AIDS.

5. HIV Proteins are not HIV Proteins, Are Only Sometimes or Later, or Perhaps Another Time Important (or not), Depending…

In HIV-ology, proteins with numbers (daltons – microscopic weight) are very important. The good news is you can find these “HIV specific proteins” in everybody. In pregnant women, in their children, and certainly in sick people, arthritic, alcoholic, whatever, poor, starving, etc. They occur everywhere, in animals too.

“The French group did not detect gp41 in their immune precipitation studies using purified LAV. Their inability to detect this protein in their ELISA or immune precipitation experiments is probably the main reason that their positive scores with AIDS and pre-AIDS sera were so low.”

Hey, isn’t ‘gp41’ the capo da tutti of all HIV proteins? But, well. Bah. Besides p24, which shows up everywhere. So. You know. Screw it, sure it’s important. But, you know, we don’t want to be anal-retentive!

Nope, You don’t have to find any “HIV” proteins in “HIV.” Monty found a p25, not a p24 (but I’m sure that was just an accounting error); and he didn’t find any very important p41…

And what’s this: “Scores were so low?” This means, yes, the tests SUCK.

6. HIV Occurs in SOME AIDS Patients…

Or, really “reverse transcriptase” occurs in some, or alot of AIDS, and also non-AIDS patients. Because when they say, “HIV,” they mean, “We found this enzyme, and we’ll say it’s a virus. We know it’s not, but you’re never going to figure that out.”

Reverse Transcriptase is an enzyme process, (many enzymes) which ‘copy’ material from RNA to DNA.

They used to think this “backward copying” was a big deal, because it contradicted DNA-wonderbrats Watson and Crick, (who were wrong about almost anything, anyway, except they figured out where to put the phosphates – on the inside. Linus Pauling put them on the outside, so he didn’t discover DNA, and they ‘did.’)

The mainstream used to get so excited about RT (reverse transcriptase), that they liked to imagine that it only occurred in Tumor Viruses (which no longer are said to really exist as such, so they were relabeled retroviruses, which are now being rechristened, ‘exosomes.’)

But the HIV quacks spend their time and your dollars looking for RT.

That is, You don’t have to find anything anywhere consistently, as long as the NIH is paying your tab (and you’re spending their (I mean, the taxpayer’s) dough). How many AIDS patients ‘have HTLV/LAV/LAI/HUT9’ etc??

So here you can find RT in….

The 48 HTLV-III isolates [Yes, they don’t really mean “isolate,” they mean reverse transcriptase] were obtained from –

•    18 of 21 tested patients with unexplained lymphadenopathy and leukopenia, with an inverted T4/T8 lymphocyte ratio (designated pre-AIDS), [No, it was probably not ‘unexplained,’ it’s just not politically correct to talk about poppers]
•    3 of 4 clinically normal mothers of juvenile AIDS patients,
•    3 of 8 juvenile AIDS patients,
•    13 of 43 adult AIDS patients with Kaposis sarcoma,
•    10 of 21 adults AIDS patients with opportunistic infections, and
•    1 of 22 clinically normal homosexual donors.

10 out of 21. 13 out of 43. With their version of “HIV” (reverse transcriptase). And they sell THIS to the public? What a sick bunch of … right. Research dollars are needed to help these poor lab jockeys along.

So, here they’re working on improving HIV tests, because they come up pos for everyone who’s sick in any way, and they want the protein reactions to focus on the drug addicts and gay men:

In a second accompanying paper…The number of sera that gave positive scores in the ELISA were:

•    43 of 49 (88%) of patients with AIDS (two of whom had developed AIDS after blood transfusion)
•    11 of 14 patients with pre-AIDS, [“I am your doctor. I regret to inform you that you have….Pre-AIDS… You’ll have to wear a condom on your face, because HTLV-iii is very fragile, and you don’t want to break it, do you?”]
•    3 of 5 intravenous drug users (of which one positive ways also homosexual),
•    6 of 17 homosexual men.
•     Out of 186 controls only one scored positive in the ELISA (1 of the 164 normal subjects).  [“Normal subjects,” ie, not drug addicts. Here they’re getting better at gearing the tests to people with drug and other-related antibody production]

Pretty good, huh? They’re getting the tests to work a liiiiitttle better on sick people. 88% of their AIDS patients now click the tests. Impressive. You’ve just identified that 88% of the people are sick. And also everybody else.

Now, here are retro-antibodies showing up in all immune illness:

•    “The controls also included 3 patients with hepatitis B virus infection, 1 with rheumatoid arthritis, 6 with systemic lupus erythematosus, 4 with acute mononucleosis, and 8 patients with lymphatic leukemias.Of the latter some were positive for HTLV-I.”

Wow! More people are ‘positive’ for more fake retroviruses, based on a finding of non-specific antibodies and reverse transcriptase…

How’s this for an hypothesis:

Sick people produce more retroviral proteins and reverse transcriptase than very healthy people. As do pregnant women, drug users (file under ‘sick,’), people starving to death and riddled with parasites (see ‘sick people’), and, well. You get the gist.

7. HIV Proteins Can Be Added to the Consensus at Any Time, if Someone Important Says So.

The mainstream worked in waves, with different cell cultures, different cancer T-Cells, different labs. They all got different results.

They welded them together to create a consensus idea of “HIV”.

“None of these 22 control patients scored positive in the ELISA or Western blot. Of note, in Western blot the antigen most prominently and commonly detected among all of the sera from AIDS patients had a molecular weight of 41,000 (now designated gp41).

It was presumed that this is a virus envelope protein (which later turned out to be correct). Others, including myself, have later confirmed that gp41 is extremely reactive in ELISA of sera from HIV infected individuals. In fact we have found that an ELISA having as only antigen a peptide with the amino acids GKLICT, representing an epitope of gp41, reacts positively with the majority of sera from HIV infected individuals.”

It was presumed! And so it was. And Don Francis, and Jay Levy, and all the other members of the goon squad made some dollars too, by adding more crap proteins to the mix, that didn’t show up elsewhere. How great for all of them, to find different crap proteins in different people that they all added to the consensus agreement bitch’s brew; that was then sold to Abbott labs, to make fake HIV tests.

Let’s have a holiday in their honor.


And we’re back where we started. p41 is important, except when it isn’t. Like in the premiere Nobel-prize winning papers on “LAV” (I mean…HT…L…..whatever, you get the point….

And the proteins get added after the fact, and there’s no there there.

Anyway, read the paper. It’s illuminating, especially in the deep criticisms of Montagnier, the chronic ad hoc additions; the papier mâché  nature of the whole thing… built from failure, from nothing, with each group finding nothing like the previous, and improvising a theory out of it – “HIV.”

Really, improvising:

“We found a ‘new protein’ to your thing; sure you never found it, but that’s science – it’s a mystery!! Let’s add it into the consensus model!”

And extra credit to anyone who wants to figure this one out:

“It is noteworthy that B.R.U.’s serum reacted with 90–100% of the co-cultured cells from B.R.U and the healthy donor since we know that only the CD4 positive cells should be infected. The B.R.U.’s serum also reacted with 90–100% of the HTLV-I producing cells! If this were to be due to a possible double infection with HIV and HTLV-I again only CD4 positive cells should be positive. More likely something unrelated to either HIV or HTLV-I was detected by the B.R.U. serum, in my opinion most probably mycoplasma, a common contaminant in cell culture.”

How cross-contaminated can something be and still be “pure?” And yet it’s still proof..of………..???

“The 0.5 to 2% positive infected umbilical cord lymphocytes may indicate retrovirus-infected cells. However, the lack of reactivity with the p19 and p24 sera with these cells is not a proof that the B.R.U. virus was not HTLV-I. The few percentages of possibly positive cells could simply have been missed with the specific antibodies but detected with the patient’s sera containing antibodies to all viral proteins. The paper does not present any photos of the fluorescent cells.”

They grow their proteins in contaminated cultures – umbilical cells, cancer T-Cells. Which contain…what…?

Anybody? Anybody…

Reverse transcriptase; retroviruses. All the stuff they’re looking for.  They’re always going to find what they’re looking for – which is cellular detritus.

Happy hunting. Interesting paper, most definitely worth reading, especially for the ‘fragile,’ ‘never the same,’ and the list of percentages…

HIV Is Mutating Out Of Existence

RTB: We received this HIV agit-prop emission, caught on the great Pravda radio coming out of Pharmagrad, with story number one arriving courtesy of the great Terry Michael, who always finds the best articles from deep inside the brain hole zone of hiv-ology…

A New Plan To Mutate HIV Out Of Existence [Link]

Koronis Pharmaceuticals, a Seattle-based biotech company, has a potential solution to the HIV epidemic with KP-1461, a new kind of drug that essentially mutates HIV into oblivion. If it works, patients could eventually get off the drug altogether and remain HIV-free.

And Terry Notes that even the brain-dead mainstream sees greed writ large:

But as the tests continue, Koronis may run into problems forming partnerships with major pharmaceutical companies that are happy with the current state of the HIV drug market. “The business model is predicated on the chronic application of drugs that have very high margins,” says Koronis CEO Don Elmer. “What we can say clearly is that there is not a sense of urgency. Collectively [the big pharmaceutical companies] are quite happy to just to let things kind of evolve on their own, and they’re not particularly interested in figuring out how to change the overall standard of care.” Despite this, Koronis has had ongoing interactions with six of the seven largest pharmaceutical companies for the better part of the last decade.

Our response:


Hold on…..hold on…



oh…okay… okay.. uh… oh no… can’t stop it…here it comes again..


Oh, sorry. Sorry… sorry. Hard to… look.

It’s just, HIV is supposed to be ‘deadly and unstoppable,’ because it ‘mutates so often,’ and is so ‘wily,’ ‘fragile,’ and ‘hard to pin down.’

Or, as HIV-ologist, Robin Weiss says:

– Hey, “It’s complicated!” Says the master debater.

We’ve been told and told and told that its ‘mutability’ was what made it dangerous:

But evolution can also occur in a relative eyeblink. That’s the case when the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) becomes locked in a survival struggle in the body of a patient who’s taking powerful anti-viral drugs.

It’s evolution in fast-forward mode. The virus, replicating billions of times a day, can acquire new mutations at lightning speed: eventually, some of the genetic changes enable the virus to resist even the most powerful drugs. These drug-resistant viruses come to dominate the population and threaten the patient’s life. – From PBS, the Public Brainwashing Service (take the challenge!)

You see… it’s “evolution” in an eyeblink… Because “HIV” (which is no single particle, which is measured by tests that can’t tell if you’re a goat, a mouse, or a starving dude with parasites), apparently doesn’t get ‘better’ when you poison – er, ‘treat’ people with ‘life-saving’ (life-ending) drugs.

Hence, “it” must be “mutating.”

Get it? Because despite taking deadly drugs… right. People get very sick. (Shocking, I know).

Well AIDS industry…we relent. Have at it. ‘Mutate’ it out of existence. Whatever the bleep it takes to stop killing people and branding them sexual lepers all over the impoverished world.

So, for next week, The AIDS industry will take on a new task; stop fighting and embrace that ‘mutation. Mutation is good. Let’s mutate that old AIDS eugenics industry right ‘out of existence.’

But darn it, we at RTB admit to ourselves that we too need some pharma-type money. we can pretend to do crap all day long and lie to Congress about it, too, you know…

AIDS is Real, HIV is Fake

by Liam Scheff

AIDS, as in immune deficiency, is real enough. It certainly can be ‘acquired,’ either through drug abuse, poverty, toxic exposure, or antibiotic overload. It can be congenital – some people are born with broken, weak or deficient immune systems. AIDS is real enough.

HIV, as in “HIV tests,” and the ‘wily retrovirus,’ however, is an invention, or really, a conglomeration or accumulation of separable phenomena – cross-reacting protein tests, budding ‘exosomal’ sub-cellular particles, bits of broken cellular structures – brought together over time, by different researchers at different labs, all believing that this hodge-podge of cellular detritus adds up to one thing (but only in the gay men and African women they like to target for the make-believe ‘HIV test’ rigmarole).

The drugs that come next will knock out any fungus or bacteria that’s growing in you – but it will destroy your blood, intestines and bone marrow too, leaving you lifeless after extended use. It makes the drugs dangerous to take, and hard to quit.

AIDS is real enough. Immune deficiency exists, and has many causes. It’s the idea that this diagnosis has one, and only one cause, that is the greatest medical fiction of our age.

Why The Wart Virus is Not the Cause of Cervical Cancer

RTB: As the Gardisil vaccine continues to maim and kill girls and young women worldwide, Cal Crilly has investigated a plausible and more likely cause of cervical cancer – which occurs not in little girls, but middle-aged and older women. The link – Pharmaceutical hormones fed to women – ie Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) – and  chemcals used in gasoline and sexual lubricants – parabens, and Benzene.

Why The Wart Virus is Not the Cause of Cervical Cancer

by Cal Crilly

Well I watched my mother in law dying horribly from cervical cancer 6 years ago and I’m probably lucky I was politely given a divorce so I didn’t get to see the last year of her demise. It was devastating for my ex.

In the years before getting cervical cancer my mother in law was put on Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) to help menopausal symptoms, millions of older women are on this hormone which stimulates cancer growth if it ever happens. And millions more are on the pill which also stimulates cancer growth.

Of course there is a massive propaganda campaign at the moment to sell the Gardasil vaccine to young girls in the false belief that some sort of immunity from the wart virus will save them later in life.

Is that vaccine safe?

  • “As of January 31, 2010, there have been 49 U.S. reports of death among females who have received Gardasil.”
  • Reports of Health Concerns Following HPV Vaccination.
  • Meet the Gardasil Girls
  • NY legislators push Gardasil mandate as more deaths are reported [Link]
  • Another Gardasil HPV vaccine victim [Link]
  • Another Gardasil death?: One irate letter to the NZ ministry of health [Link]
  • Grieving mother blames cancer vaccine [Link]

So are the adverse affects such as immediate death and brain damage worth the risk as compared to possibly? getting cervical cancer later in life?

Also note that there are 100 different strains of wart virus and the HPV vaccine is only for a few of them. And especially when the wart virus may not be the MAIN cause of cervical cancer?

“A vaccine against human papilloma virus 16 (HPV16)— which is the most common type of HPV and accounts for most cases of cervical cancer — has previously been shown to protect against HPV16 infection in women. However, most of the women in these studies were taking oral contraceptives, which regulate menstruation and production of sex hormones.” [Link] Continue reading Why The Wart Virus is Not the Cause of Cervical Cancer

Is the AIDS CD4 T-Cell Test a Measure of Fat?

RTB: We’re pleased to present another research essay by Cal Crilly. Cal has provided some truly groundbreaking work in understanding ‘Why retroviruses appear in autoimmune disease, cancer and Aids,’ and we recommend that you read his entire oeuvre, or body of work here at RTB, to follow his often whimsical journeys into wonderful and remarkable insight.

The AIDS CD4 T-Cell Test: A Measure of Fat?

by Cal Crilly

Well I swap the odd message with a HIV+ lady in Europe when I get to a net cafe every couple of weeks as I don’t know if anyone else does.

In her last couple of messages she said she “was worried about her CD4 count going down as the doctors would then harass her to take antiretrovirals” which in the past made her very sick. She also said that while her CD4 went down she felt better and heather than ever…

So I looked.

I have been an observer of the AIDS story for a good 13 years now, if I wander into a net cafe it’s because I noticed something you need to know.

I may be wrong about these observations but if I don’t mention them then no one else will say it….

So to me it looks like CD4 is mainly a marker for cholesterol and arterial plaque not the immune system. CD4 and CD8 counts goes up with cholesterol and nicotinamide will make cholesterol and CD4 go down because it’s a fat metaboliser. CD4 cells gather at the areas of arterial plaque and tell white blood cells to come and gobble up the cholesterol. Continue reading Is the AIDS CD4 T-Cell Test a Measure of Fat?

Pre-Empting World AIDS Day Radio Weekend

Join Liam Scheff, Robert Scott Bell, and a panel of guest researchers, journalists and scientists on a full-frontal exposure of the AIDS machine.


Saturday 6PM – “The Investigation with Liam Scheff” with special guest, journalist Terry Michael, to discuss the ‘old-is-new’ pre-HIV drug ‘therapy’ for healthy gay and bisexual men. The death dealers at the NIH want to pre-drug you for AIDS, with drugs that will kill you over time, and can do so quickly! What is their rationale? And where is their shame? [CLICK] “Does Poison Make You Healthy?”

Sunday – Two Full Hours on the Robert Scott Bell Show: – 1PM to 3PM EST, 10AM to Noon Pacific Time.

Call in at 1-800-259-5791 during show hours with your questions or comments. [CLICK]

Confirmed guests thus far include attorney David Steele, Investigator Clark Baker, Journalist Liam Scheff, Professor Charles Geshekter and Journalist Joan Shenton.

Sunday 6PM – “The Investigation” returns, with special guest, Jonathan Campbell, as we go through the history and technology of Linus Pauling, Matthias Rath, Vitamin C and reversing heart disease and immune deficiency (AIDS). [CLICK]

Tune in and learn about the AIDS monster….

The news from on repeats like a nervous tick: “New drug breakthroughs could save the world from AIDS! This could be the one! The long sought Holy Grail.”

And every year, we’re sold a new cure – a potential breakthrough!  But it’s always been the same news for Twenty-FIVE SOLID YEARS!  “Look! We’re almost there! Just send MORE MONEY!!!”

So, is it true? Is the new breakthrough new?  Before we can answer the question, we must define our terms:

  • What is AIDS? It is Multifactorial; it is poverty and drug abuse – illnesses that are real! But under the “AIDS” banner, they are given a new label, a one-size-fits all brand name diagnosis.
  • What is HIV? “It” was LAV, then HTLV-3, then HIV, and now? It’s the “Trojan Exosome!”

“It” is a misnomer – another brand name for thousands of changeable bits of DNA, sucked out of cell cultures, passed through chemical stimulation to produce bits of protein. The AIDS mainstream makes a religious item out of these proteins, and grinds them down to synthetic ‘consensus agreed’ molecules, grown in labs. They say they represent one unique particle, even though they’ve been gathered from the four winds! And these proteins occur in people both sick and healthy.

AIDS is a brand name by which powerful pharma companies and governments convince you that the endemic and brutalizing poverty suffered by a majority of the world is somehow sexually contagious, and must be treated by toxic drugs and condoms – population control mechanisms….

On this weekend’s shows, we hammer and shake the paradigm and see what comes loose, and watch it tumble down, only to be put up again by your tax dollars, spent and misspent by Anthony Fauci’s N.I.H.

When will you take objection to the fraud? What if you were given a fraudulent HIV test diagnosis? Would you think, read and fight? Or would you lay down and take the drugs they prescribed to you?

Tune in to learn about this deadly paradigm, and how it has infected all of medical science….

Does the NIH Want to Kill All Gay Men (or is it Just Tired of Selling AIDS to the General Public)?

by Liam Scheff

The AIDS industry has been so firmly exposed by the work of whistle-blowers, medical activists, scientists, researchers and journalists, it’s more naked than Lady Godiva after a rude haircut; it’s more nude than the Emperor who wore no clothes on the day he decided to really let it all hang out…

It’s more exposed than… well, you get the point.

But thanks to the terrific work of hundreds of individuals to demand transparency in this rotten paradigm, and research and news websites like RTB, Henry Bauer’s excellent site and book, T.I.G. South Africa, The Perth Group, Rethinking AIDS, NotAIDS,, and more (add yours in comments, please, if I’ve missed it), the truth about AIDS is becoming well known.

And what’s the truth about AIDS? It is this: AIDS is a multi-factorial, complex toxicological immune problem, or series of problems – that has no single cause, and no single viral cause.

HIV is a construct, mostly mental at this point, of loosely-associated laboratory material, cobbled together in academic papers and models; “it” is really a “many,” as in many proteins, genetic strands and loose material that have been associated, in some people, and only some people, with immune deficiency. “HIV” was once called a ‘tumor virus,’ but that it didn’t cause tumors, it was re-labeled a ‘retrovirus,’ but that it had no stable size, shape or form, it passed into being a “Trojan Exosome” – ie, a variety of protein bubbles manufactured in all human cells under stress.

In other words, the variety of things called HIV are made by you, from you, in you, and are most likely cellular messengers. There is no single, identifiable “HIV,” there are only many “HIVs,” none of which eat, screw or chomp on T-Cells. They’re probably more like emails from cell to cell; or perhaps messages to the immune system. Or articles of epigenetic adjustment or ‘evolution’ within the body.

The mainstream got it wrong from the start. They labeled a loose construction of debris as one important thing. They mislabeled the ‘exosomal’ process as a deadly viral process. They mistook what was important as a messaging system for what they were hoping to find – a deadly viral cause of cancer. When these fragments turned out to cause zero and no cancers, the AIDS true-believers simply changed their theory again. “HIV” (all, any, some and whichever), would “kill T-Cells.” This was their theory. And it has been dead from day one.

And so, the mainstream has moved from telling the world that HIV causes AIDS by “directly” killing T-Cells. When they failed to demonstrate anything resembling that theory, they held tight and said that perhaps T-Cells were being “indirectly affected” through unknown means.

The latest incarnation of AIDS theory offers that “HIV” might actually “stimulate” the immune system! Thereby causing…??

But these rotten children cannot publicly let go of their failed theory – or they’ll pay with their careers. And so, they continue to “first do harm,” by drugging all “HIV positives” to death over time, and often quickly.

AIDS, Inc: “Making People Sick is Our Business”

The AIDS lobby and pharma mafia that do their public and very dirty work have driven hundreds of thousands to early graves by drugging them mercilessly with the world’s most toxic ‘Black Box’ prescription drugs. While those who sought treatment through detoxification, a la the Pauling method, updated and improved by Matthias Rath, have been vilified, cursed, and literally wished dead by the very AIDS lobbyists who pin sacred ‘red ribbons’ on everything they do and touch – and sell. But their real interest in AIDS is the following:

“Every death is a victory; every illness ‘proof’ of their cause.”

Nevertheless, they’ve been whittled down from their mount, by public exposure. The recent documentary “House of Numbers” put in living color, at 24 frames per second, the AIDS industry in their own words. And it was a terrible blow for the masters of deceit at the NIH, such as is presided over by ‘Capo’ Anthony Fauci.

And so, what to do, what to do?

They’ve got to find a way to grind it to a halt. And so they are.

The news is now this: “HIV” is preventable, if only gay men will self-suicide all the days of their lives. That is, they must pre-drug with AIDS drugs. Yes, the same deadly “Black Box” drugs will now be taken by perfectly healthy (but deeply paranoid) young gay men. And “AIDS” will be over.

Here is how it reads at the BBC, and all agencies that parrot the propaganda from the NIH machine:

Drug ‘can greatly reduce risk of HIV infection’

Truvada, which is made California-based Gilead Sciences, combines two antiretroviral drugs.

* HIV epidemic ‘halted’, says UN
* Molecule structure hope for HIV

A drug used to treat HIV-positive patients may offer gay and bisexual men some protection against contracting the virus, the authors of a new study say.

What are the drugs? What are the effects? What is “some protection?” Against what, precisely? Testing HIV positive? But HIV tests come up positive for any and every illness. Will this stop “AIDS?” No, real “AIDS” – as in serious toxicological and environmental immune deficiency – will rage on, and Western nations will ignore it.

You can see an early analysis of the AIDS industry’s new move in this paper I researched and wrote a few years ago. It tells the rationale for drugging all neurotic and willing young gay men.

“Does the New York Times Want to Kill Gay Men?” GNN 2006

Here is how they proved their theory that all gay men should be drugged: The good laboratory scientists shoved some laboratory proteins up the rear ends of some macaque monkeys.


What does all of it mean? It means that the mainstream is looking for a way out of the big stinking tent they’ve erected. They want to close down the house of death and pain that they’ve locked populations into for three decades. And they need to wave a magic wand to make the population think that there was a real, rational, ‘scientific’ reason that it ended.

Rather than revealing what has happened – the exposure of a fraud – they want to sell one more product.

So, are you buying?

What Is AIDS?

RTB: Please read and pass along Jonathan Campbell’s excellent new historical review of immune deficiency and AIDS. Here’s an excerpt:

What is AIDS?

by Jonathan Campbell (and excerpt)

AIDS stands for Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome. This is not a “disease” in itself. It’s the inability to fight off disease vectors and toxins. There are bacteria, funguses (molds), and chemical toxins all around us in the air, in our food and water, and in our contact with others. People who have a strong immune system are able to deal with this; the immune system has numerous ways to stop these invaders from causing disease. People with weak immunity get ill all the time, and need constant antibiotic therapy to keep them from dying. We know that adequate nutrition and sufficient ascorbate – vitamin C – is needed for immune health.

History is filled with stories of deadly diseases, from the deaths of individual young people to the massive plagues of Europe. Why would this happen, sometimes even in cases where people seemed to have sufficient food? Why did some people survive, even though they must have been exposed to the same disease vectors? There are stories about Nostradamus, whose “rose pills” (containing ascorbate) apparently saved hundreds of people from the plague. For those that died, their immune systems were not up to the challenge of crowded living conditions, poor sanitation, contaminated water, and lots of disease vectors all around. (Does this sound familiar? Does this sound like conditions in many parts in Africa today?).

The answer is provided by the works of Albert Szent-Györgyi in 1930, Fred Klenner in 1949 and especially Irwin Stone in 1979. Albert Szent-Györgyi was the first to identify and isolate ascorbate (vitamin C) and identify it as essential to immune health and to recognize that humans and guinea pigs could not synthesize it internally. Klenner provided the first hint of using it for treatment of serious disease: he discovered that polio could be effectively treated – in fact cured – by intravenous ascorbate (vitamin C); he was probably the first physician to use intravenous ascorbate to fight disease. But it was Stone who clearly identified the medical-social problem in his groundbreaking work “Eight Decades of Scurvy.” He discovered that the amount of ascorbate consumed by most humans was insufficient to maintain our immune systems: the entirety of humanity was in a state of subclinical scurvy. Continue reading What Is AIDS?

Scientists Zero in on Protein that Stops HIV

by Liam Scheff

That wily HIV retro…er…vir…uhm… Trojan Exosome! It is made by our cells using our own proteins! It appears to be harmless but must secretly be dimishing stimulating doing SOMETHING toaroundnearin the vicinity of … in the same body in which there are some T-Cells, because as everyone (who is not a denialist), K-N-O-W-S: “HIV is THE one and only cause of AIDS.”

Here are some scientists to tell you exactly how it’s done….

– Click! for more.

But, beyond the FACTS, is the race for the CURE! It’s been a long race. More like..well…not really a foot-race.. Maybe more like about 10,000 marathons, bundled into one, long, expensive, toxic-side-effect riddled event.

In any case… Scientists, those noble masters of benign genius, are now finding that a magical protein might stop that rampaging, wily, fragile, lazy, hard-to-pin-down, constantly mutating, neutered, non-extant retro-trojan-exosomal bundle of your proteins (which in some people MUST be causing SOMETHING!)
Continue reading Scientists Zero in on Protein that Stops HIV

Quitting AIDS Drugs Is Hard to Do, and Hard Not To…

AIDS critics often miss the point that quitting AIDS drugs is hard, and can be dangerous. The major thrust of dissidence has been simply to get people off the drugs, or to expose the great (and plentiful) frauds of the AIDS industry. But this is not a solution for people who are ill, who do want to quit the drugs, but do not have an understanding of the difficulties they will have in re-building their immune system – if that is indeed possible after, say, 10 years on chemotherapy drugs….AIDS critics, a.k.a. “dissidents,” often disregard or even scorn this reality. But what for? It is reality, after all. Continue reading Quitting AIDS Drugs Is Hard to Do, and Hard Not To…

HERV not HIV – Liam Scheff on the Robert Scott Bell Show

What is HIV? A retrovirus, or a piece of human genome expressed under bodily stress and gene deregulation? (Or are they one and the same?) We ask and answer the question on the Robert Scott Bell Show. (See Robert and Liam at the Health Freedom Expo).

Follow along with the article An On/Off Switch for Retroviruses – Can it be that Simple?

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Download pt. 1

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Download pt. 2

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Download pt 3

AIDS – A Kissing Disease?

Excerpt from How AIDS Didn’t Become A Kissing Disease (for
AIDS – The Kissing Disease?

Download PDF

It should be noted that Gonda and Gallo’s picture [below] is of “HTVL-III” (later called “HIV”) in human saliva. The paper notes: “Virus was also isolated from the saliva of eight of the 18 individuals who were seropositive for HTLV-III-specific antibodies…from the saliva of four of the ARC patients and four of the healthy homosexuals.” That is, if you believe any of their research at all, we carry infectious “HIV” in our mouths. Is this something we’re told by the AIDS establishment?

Gonda - Gallo HTLV-III Saliva
AIDS Science Today

Twenty-five years of AIDS research have demonstrated the following: Gallo’s “HTLV-III” has no particular, reproducible size or gene sequence; the proteins that are supposed to belong to it and it alone are found in almost every human disease and condition. The “LAV/HTLV-III/HIV” proteins and gene sequences have to be cobbled together through ‘consensus agreement’ among different labs because while fishing in beaten-up cell cultures, researches always find different things to call “HIV.”

Finally, “HIV” in any or all of its forms, has never been shown to even remotely affect T-Cells, which is the only meaningful prediction of AIDS theory. But none of this has mattered to AIDS researchers, because AIDS theory is about fear, politics and social control, and has never been about science.

Read the entire article at

An On/Off Switch for Retroviruses – Can it be that Simple?

H-E-R-V not H-I-V
An On/Off Switch for Retroviruses – Can it be that Simple?

by Liam Scheff

First, this is an area of exploration I’ve been reaching into, but am now firmly committed to, with many thanks to Cal Crilly (who I believe we are all indebted to) for leading the way. I hope you’ll jump in the pool with me. Keep your waders on and kick your feet, we’ll all learn on the way. Here goes…

Science Daily presents a new study describing an “on/off switch for retroviruses.” Did you know turning retroviruses off was that simple? Contradictions abound – here they describe retroviruses as ‘fatal,’ but intended for good; but they are generally considered normal, ubiquitous and non-toxic, except when they’re talking about their favorite cash cow, “HIV.”

“ScienceDaily (Apr. 10, 2010) — A University of British Columbia doctoral candidate has discovered a previously unknown mechanism for silencing retroviruses, segments of genetic material that can lead to fatal mutations in a cell’s DNA. The findings, published in the journal Nature, could lead to new cancer treatments that kill only tumour cells and leave healthy surrounding tissue unharmed.”

How do they intend to do this neat trick? By using an enzyme which determines how DNA is expressed. This brings us in line with Cal Crilly’s breakthrough analysis of ‘methylation,’ ‘demethylation,’ and the creation of retroviruses in AIDS, cancer and auto-immune diseases. Continue reading An On/Off Switch for Retroviruses – Can it be that Simple?