How to Talk to an AIDS Denialist – Episode 1

Did you enjoy this post? Why not leave a comment below and continue the conversation, or subscribe to my feed and get articles like this delivered automatically to your feed reader.

Comments

bwahahahaha love it. fucking aids nazis.

[Reply]

Thanks Liam for putting a big smile on my face at 6:30 am! Trouble is, I don’t know how I’m going to wait for Episode 2!

[Reply]

This is the start of a great comic strip. You don’t need to make up characters, they already exist, you have an endless supply of them! They just need clown shoes, that’s all :)

[Reply]

Brilliant.

[Reply]

You forgot one of their scripts:

“You’re a DENIALIST – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO – ARE TOO…” etc.

[Reply]

I’m no denialist. I just play one on my blog–since I can’t do it in the Main Stream Media. Some things you just can’t discuss in a liberal democracy with a not-quite-so-free press.

[Reply]

Hahahahaha! But wait a second….I thought humour was supposed to be an exaggeration of the truth? Where’s the exaggeration bit?

[Reply]

This is the beginning of a beautiful comic strip.

Absolutely brilliant, and incredibly funny especially to those who have seen their rhetoric. But somehow I don’t think Moore, Geffen, and Kalichman will find it funny.

Suggestion: at some point, maybe soon, need to bring in their response to people who are “novice denialists” – those who just started asking the “wrong” questions, or happened to pursue the “wrong” line of research (e.g. Padian).

Cheers
Jon

[Reply]

Very funny, but also very true.

[Reply]

You forgot about the part about when the denialists start quoting scientific papers. Whoah, you gotta leave that stuff to the experts. You don’t have a PhD you don’t have no right to be a peepin’ Tom in the PubMed stacks…

[Reply]

Bravo, Liam!
From an… ignorant woman

[Reply]

Oh my, he draws too! LOL. Can’t wait for the next installment, and then the paperback collection.

[Reply]

LMAO, you also forgot to mention when proof is standing right in front of their face and they look right through you with an empty gaze as if you’re a ghost. Or better yet, “You’re one of the lucky ones,” (thought) – isn’t it time for a “cocktail?”

[Reply]

This is great! I’m staying tuned….

[Reply]

Just a clarification, I forgot the quote marks in the “ignorant woman” note before, that is what a guy using the name AIDSdenialist called me recently in his comments on You tube. Funny, isn’t it?

[Reply]

I guess he’s just coming from a place of love and wanting everyone to be well??? HAAAA! That’s the thing about those ‘troofers’ their just so loving.

[Reply]

This is good. Diggin’ the comic.

First we criticize the dissidents, excuse me, MURDEROUS DENIALISTS (gong sounds) for not publishing in peer reviewed journals.
Then we form a clique that only allows certain papers to make it in the peer reviewed lit, and reject any of the scientific papers indicating dissenting information.

Am I missing something here? ;-)

[Reply]

Leave a comment

(required)

(required)