Tag Archives: Scientific Racism

Pitch the Baby – An HIV Bedtime Story

by Terry Michael

“this is not the cure you are looking for”

Fauci reports Mississippi baby is un-cured of HIV. “Still more research needed.”

The HIV-AIDS Industry is in a state of shock, as it prepares for its biennial AIDSFest, July 20-25 in Melbourne (the 20th International AIDS Society conference.)

At the National Allergy and Infectious Diseases web site Thursday (July 10), AIDS-czar-for-life (since Nov. 3, 1984), Dr.Anthony Fauci, lamented that his much vaunted “proof of concept” of a HIV “functional cure” is now just another setback, requiring….you guessed it…more research!

From the NIAID full press release, my emphasis added:

“Certainly, this is a disappointing turn of events for this young child, the medical staff involved in the child’s care, and the HIV/AIDS research community,” said NIAID Director Anthony S. Fauci, M.D. “Scientifically, this development reminds us that we still have much more to learn about the intricacies of HIV infection and where the virus hides in the body. The NIH remains committed to moving forward with research on a cure for HIV infection.”

That wily HIV skillfully “hides” in “reservoirs” in the body, stealthily lurking about until it unexpectedly rears its ugly head, according to pseudo scientists like Fauci–who has squandered scores of billions of taxpayer dollars in his three decades as NIAID director, during which time both a “cure” and a “vaccine” have eluded our intrepid AIDS czar.

You will recall Fauci’s excitement in March 2013, when Mississippi pediatrician (and former Baptist missionary to Africa) Dr. Hannah Gay engaged in outrageous medical malpractice, apparently in her missionary zeal for faith-healing a 30-hour-old baby with a highly toxic cocktail of AZT and other ARV chemotherapy, without so much as a so-called “HIV test.” It was a “gutsy call,” the good doctor Fauci was quoted as saying at the time (“gutsy,” as in “insane?!”)

Since that time, Fauci has allocated more millions for more human baby research, of which he promises even more. In addition to experiments on tiny infants, Fauci continues to tout “pre[HIV]-exposure prophylaxis” (PrEP) for HIV antibody NEGATIVE gay men, IV drug users, Sub Saharan Africans, African American women, and other victims of the magical, mystical bug called the “probable cause of AIDS” by U.S. government declaration on April 23, 1984.

I de-construct the PrEP madness here, including Fauci’s crony capitalist collusion with the PrEPy, peppy “Truvada” drug dealers at politically-connected Gilead Sciences of Foster City, CA, whose CEO John C. Martin was placed by Fauci on his NIAID Advisory Council 14 years ago: AIDS War Profiteering by Terry Michael, July 2014

When will this insanity end?

— Terry Michael, Executive Director
Washington Center for Politics & Journalism
WCPJ WEB: www.wcpj.org

HIV Super-duper Rapid Nanotechnology Test (Fraud!)

by Liam Scheff

The HIV police are coming for you! They’ve got a “nanotechnology rapid test!” Yes, they can tell you in SECONDS if you’re…Right – not infected with anything specific at all – because the “test” is actually for a protein that occurs in millions of people* called “P24.” (and who knows, maybe all humans).

But at the Daily Mail, they think it’s gangbusters.

“Colour-coded blood test that turns blue if you have HIV is 10 times more sensitive than current methods” blares the headline, ignoring all reality.

Yes! The test turns BLUE! Like a sexual organ squeezed too hard, too long. Or, something like that. But, what does the test test for?

After lying to the public about the nature of “HIV” and “AIDS,” they admit that:

“The new sensor works by testing serum, a clear watery fluid derived from blood samples, in a disposable container for the presence of an HIV biomarker called p24.”

Ah, P24. “HIV biomarker.” And a “biomarker” for .. well, right. Just being alive. No, this protein is not a stand-in for any particular particle at all. Theirs is a synthetically-produced protein blob whose molecular weight is about that of a great deal of the stuff that you produce in your own cells everyday – especially if you have any gut-related illness (see ‘gut related immune deficiency‘ and learn about fixing your intestines).

And, in the standard medical literature, you can see how rarely or often it shows up in people who are and who aren’t supposed to have it, if you want to bother with the details. (ahem. Daily Mail. Hello?)

Right. Not them, but you. Coming soon to your gay or poor neighborhood – new tests! Because, as always:

The mainstream is trying to kill you.

Or, have it your way – they just don’t know any better. Is it that the pod people who write this crap are bleeding idiots who can’t figure out how to do a cross-referencing or fact-check on an article? Or, is it that the purpose of mainstream, brainwash-the-masses media is to lie to you?

Read and comment on their propaganda/advertisement at: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2224772/HIV-Aids-British-scientists-create-ultra-sensitive-HIV-test-turns-blue-virus-present.html

 

Read the hidden history and real causes of what was AIDS in the gay community, versus AIDS in Africa – and understand the myth of HIV and HIV testing – in Chapter Six of “Official Stories,” by your narrator, Liam Scheff.

Amazon US

Amazon UK

Screwing More HIV Positives is Good For You, Says AIDS Establishment (Or, What to Wear When the Mainstream Commits Suicide)

RTB: We don’t even begin to know what to do when the mainstream begins to openly commit public suicide, but cheer.

From PLoS Pathogens, and a cancer research group in Seattle, we now have the following theory:

Have sex with as many HIV positives as possible, to protect you from…yes, that’s right. HIV.

No, you don’t misunderstand. This is what they’re saying:

“Women who have been infected by two different strains of HIV from two different sexual partners – a condition known as HIV superinfection – have more potent antibody responses that block the replication of the virus compared to women who’ve only been infected once.”

Yes. Get “infected” over and over again. Yes, that is what they’re saying. Because the whole thing is a Sham, and always has been.

Do you need them to spell it out for you? They’ve been lying to you for 30 years.

“The study suggests that harboring a mixture of different viral strains may be one way to promote a robust antibody response. The findings also suggest that being infected with two different HIV strains not only leads to a strong response, but also a more rapid response that is capable of recognizing many other HIV strains. “

Yup. So, if you’re going to screw, screw twice. And then you’ll be protected. By antibodies. To something that doesn’t exist.

Hey Anthony Fauci, please, go screw yourself, maybe that will help you become less of a eugenicist.

(Fauci is head of NIH and has destroyed millions of lives worldwide with criminally fraudulent HIV tests, and he’s just one of hundreds of bogus researchers stealing tax money to murder people, with their ignorant ‘consent’ of course.)

Back to the funny papers. I personally have got to get to the “HIV” clinic and find at LEAST two people to have sex with. Because then I’ll be protected. From HIV.

The original article:

SEATTLE – Women who have been infected by two different strains of HIV from two different sexual partners – a condition known as HIV superinfection – have more potent antibody responses that block the replication of the virus compared to women who’ve only been infected once. These findings, by researchers at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, are published online March 29 in PLoS Pathogens.

“We found that women who had been infected twice not only had more potent antibody responses, but some of these women had ‘elite’ antibody activity, meaning that they had a broad and potent ability to neutralize a wide variety of strains of HIV over a sustained period time,” said senior author Julie Overbaugh, Ph.D., a member of the Hutchinson Center’s Human Biology Division. It is estimated that only about 1 percent of people with HIV are so-called “elite neutralizers” who are able to potently neutralize multiple subtypes of the virus.

“Individuals who become superinfected with a second virus from a different partner represent a unique opportunity for studying the antibody response and may provide insights into the process of developing broad neutralizing antibodies that could inform HIV-vaccine design,” she said.

The study suggests that harboring a mixture of different viral strains may be one way to promote a robust antibody response. The findings also suggest that being infected with two different HIV strains not only leads to a strong response, but also a more rapid response that is capable of recognizing many other HIV strains.

The researchers tracked the immune activity of 12 superinfected women from Mombasa, Kenya, over a five-year period and compared each to a control group of three singly infected women. Overbaugh and lead author Valerie Cortez, a doctoral student in her lab, assessed the ability of antibodies present in superinfected and singly infected women to neutralize a spectrum of circulating HIV-1 variants. In doing so they were able to determine whether the presence of two viruses compared to one made a difference in immune response. The researchers controlled for variables such as antibody response prior to superinfection and biomarkers of immunity such as CD4+ T cell count and viral load.

The study found that superinfected women had, on average, 1.68 times more neutralizing antibodies than non-superinfected women, and they scored much higher in their ability to neutralize the virus – superinfected women had 1.46 times greater potency than the singly infected women.

More than 1.1 million Americans are estimated to be living with HIV today, and every nine-and-a-half minutes someone in the U.S. becomes infected, according to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. An HIV vaccine is considered the best approach to long-term protection from HIV infection, but attempts to develop such a vaccine so far have meet with limited success.

“The holy grail of an HIV vaccine is to elicit antibodies to the virus because antibodies have been shown to block virus infection. But there has been little progress in determining how to elicit such antibodies with a vaccine. The study of individuals HIV infected who have developed strong antibody responses to the virus may shed light on the best approach to design a vaccine that will induce an effective immune response,” Overbaugh said. http://www.eurekalert.org/

You heard the man; go get screwing.

Oh, you can contact them, if you want to point out how broken their paradigm is:

Contact: Kristen Woodward

kwoodwar@fhcrc.org

206-667-5095

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

Study finds HIV ‘superinfection’ boosts immune response

Findings may provide insight into HIV-vaccine development

HIV is Just a Mammary

by Liam Scheff

Aids Industry to You: Take your pick, and suck liberally.

File under, “Puke me a river:”

Breast milk antibody both neutralizes human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and kills HIV-infected cells, according to a paper in the September 2011 issue of the Journal of Virology.” http://www.asm.org/

So, the AIDS Industry (and complicit media) have killed thousands of women and hundreds of thousands of gay men with drugs… because breast milk ‘stops hiv?’

I think even most gay men would’ve taken a glug, if the Nazi med establishment had offered boob juice instead of AZT.

So, Aids is…over?

Tell RA to give articles like this first billing. I mean, never mind RA…!! Who needs ’em when you’ve got the world med establishment doing its best to kill HIV.

But wait, there’s more (money to be made):

“This finding indicates that enhancement of these responses through vaccination could help reduce HIV transmission via breastfeeding,” says corresponding author Sallie Permar of Duke University, Durham, NC. While HIV-specific antibodies have been identified in breast milk, this is the first study to investigate the virus-blocking functions of these antibodies.

Now, it’s the vaccine! Yes, it’s a vaccine sale, plus breast milk, that will kill HIV. Or, so says this piece of writ… Never mind that the vaccine efforts have been massive public failures – and make no sense (“HIV” infection is determined by antibodies. Vaccines are supposed to work by producing antibodies. Why a vaccine? Because people are willfully stupid. Incredibly gullible. Wildly uninterested in thinking critically. Motivated by fear and tribal identification. Ta-da!)

But wait! It’s been breast milk for years:

Sugar-containing compounds in breast milk may reduce the transmission of HIV to suckling babies, suggests a lab-based study.

Milk is already known to contain some substances that quell HIV. “Breast milk has all sorts of good stuff in it, such as antibodies from the mother,” says Louise Kuhn, who studies HIV transmission at Columbia University in New York.

Now Bill Paxton at the University of Amsterdam and his colleagues have homed in on anti-HIV compounds in milk that seem particularly powerful. They say the secret ingredient is Lewis X, a type of sugar also found in saliva and blood. http://www.nature.com

Wait wait wait….Wait. The “secret ingredient” to stopping HIV is “a type of sugar also found in saliva and blood?”Excuuuuuse me? So…wha? How? Why? We’ve killed hundreds of thousands and terrorized millions because… because… because???

But it’s still not good enough to allow African women to breast-feed. Nope, gotta kill them…uhm, ‘treat’ them with AZT.

You see, breast milk is good, but it’s also bad, so it must be mixed with stuff injected into infants. Or adults. Or, just spray breast milk on your privates:

But if the results hold true in further studies, they could lead to new ways to block transmission of HIV between adults during sex. “If it does work as a microbicide, it would be a great tool”

Or just have sex while bleeding. Or, use plenty of saliva. And if you don’t like any of those, just use copper:

Researchers from the U.S. and abroad have developed an inexpensive copper-based filter that may prevent HIV from being passed through breast milk and blood. They report their findings in the February 2008 issue of the journal Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. http://www.healthnewstrack.com/health-news-358.html

Just suck on a penny while you make whoopie. Or, eat a banana.

Your favorite oblong fruit might be even healthier than you realized. According to The Gazette (Montreal) newspaper, a new study has found that chemicals commonly found in bananas are as potent in preventing HIV as two synthetic anti-HIV drugs. Researchers say the findings could lead to a cheap new component for applied microbicides that prevent sexual transmission of HIV.

The miracle substance in bananas is called BanLec, a type of lectin, which are the sugar-binding proteins found in a variety of plants. Scientists have long been interested in lectins because of their ability to halt the chain reaction that leads to certain viral infections. In the case of BanLec, it works by binding naturally to the sugar-rich envelope that encases the HIV virus, thus blocking its entry into the body.

“The problem with some HIV drugs is that the virus can mutate and become resistant, but that’s much harder to do in the presence of lectins,” said lead author Michael D. Swanson. “Lectins can bind to the sugars found on different spots of the HIV-1 envelope, and presumably it will take multiple mutations for the virus to get around them.” http://www.mnn.com

 

Right. Bananas. Milk. Pennies. Fill in punchline. Or just stop giving people the bleeding tests, because they don’t mean a damned thing...

Abbot Labs 2006 HIV Test

Abbott Labs

“At present there is no recognized standard for establishing the presence or absence of antibodies to HIV-1 and HIV-2 in human blood.”

“The risk of an asymptomatic [not chronically ill] person with a repeatedly reactive [positive] serum sample developing AIDS or an AIDS-related condition is not known”

“Clinical studies continue to clarify and refine the interpretation and medical significance of the presence of antibodies to HIV.”

“AIDS and AIDS-related conditions are clinical syndromes and their diagnosis can only be established clinically. EIA testing [that’s this test] cannot be used to diagnose AIDS, even if the recommended investigation of reactive specimens suggest that the antibodies to HIV are present.”

So…Can we all start having sex without punishing gay men, and pregnant women – and all of Africa?

All hear ye! End HIV testing, return your HIV ‘diagnosis’ to your doctor, and let them know that you’re getting a second opinion from somebody who bothers to read the medical literature.

* Thanks to the great Terry Michael, for providing the breast milk article at the top and inspiring the conversation.

Does the NIH Want to Kill All Gay Men (or is it Just Tired of Selling AIDS to the General Public)?

by Liam Scheff

The AIDS industry has been so firmly exposed by the work of whistle-blowers, medical activists, scientists, researchers and journalists, it’s more naked than Lady Godiva after a rude haircut; it’s more nude than the Emperor who wore no clothes on the day he decided to really let it all hang out…

It’s more exposed than… well, you get the point.

But thanks to the terrific work of hundreds of individuals to demand transparency in this rotten paradigm, and research and news websites like RTB, Henry Bauer’s excellent site and book, T.I.G. South Africa, The Perth Group, Rethinking AIDS, NotAIDS, ARAS.ca.ab, and more (add yours in comments, please, if I’ve missed it), the truth about AIDS is becoming well known.

And what’s the truth about AIDS? It is this: AIDS is a multi-factorial, complex toxicological immune problem, or series of problems – that has no single cause, and no single viral cause.

HIV is a construct, mostly mental at this point, of loosely-associated laboratory material, cobbled together in academic papers and models; “it” is really a “many,” as in many proteins, genetic strands and loose material that have been associated, in some people, and only some people, with immune deficiency. “HIV” was once called a ‘tumor virus,’ but that it didn’t cause tumors, it was re-labeled a ‘retrovirus,’ but that it had no stable size, shape or form, it passed into being a “Trojan Exosome” – ie, a variety of protein bubbles manufactured in all human cells under stress.

In other words, the variety of things called HIV are made by you, from you, in you, and are most likely cellular messengers. There is no single, identifiable “HIV,” there are only many “HIVs,” none of which eat, screw or chomp on T-Cells. They’re probably more like emails from cell to cell; or perhaps messages to the immune system. Or articles of epigenetic adjustment or ‘evolution’ within the body.

The mainstream got it wrong from the start. They labeled a loose construction of debris as one important thing. They mislabeled the ‘exosomal’ process as a deadly viral process. They mistook what was important as a messaging system for what they were hoping to find – a deadly viral cause of cancer. When these fragments turned out to cause zero and no cancers, the AIDS true-believers simply changed their theory again. “HIV” (all, any, some and whichever), would “kill T-Cells.” This was their theory. And it has been dead from day one.

And so, the mainstream has moved from telling the world that HIV causes AIDS by “directly” killing T-Cells. When they failed to demonstrate anything resembling that theory, they held tight and said that perhaps T-Cells were being “indirectly affected” through unknown means.

The latest incarnation of AIDS theory offers that “HIV” might actually “stimulate” the immune system! Thereby causing…??

But these rotten children cannot publicly let go of their failed theory – or they’ll pay with their careers. And so, they continue to “first do harm,” by drugging all “HIV positives” to death over time, and often quickly.

AIDS, Inc: “Making People Sick is Our Business”

The AIDS lobby and pharma mafia that do their public and very dirty work have driven hundreds of thousands to early graves by drugging them mercilessly with the world’s most toxic ‘Black Box’ prescription drugs. While those who sought treatment through detoxification, a la the Pauling method, updated and improved by Matthias Rath, have been vilified, cursed, and literally wished dead by the very AIDS lobbyists who pin sacred ‘red ribbons’ on everything they do and touch – and sell. But their real interest in AIDS is the following:

“Every death is a victory; every illness ‘proof’ of their cause.”

Nevertheless, they’ve been whittled down from their mount, by public exposure. The recent documentary “House of Numbers” put in living color, at 24 frames per second, the AIDS industry in their own words. And it was a terrible blow for the masters of deceit at the NIH, such as is presided over by ‘Capo’ Anthony Fauci.

And so, what to do, what to do?

They’ve got to find a way to grind it to a halt. And so they are.

The news is now this: “HIV” is preventable, if only gay men will self-suicide all the days of their lives. That is, they must pre-drug with AIDS drugs. Yes, the same deadly “Black Box” drugs will now be taken by perfectly healthy (but deeply paranoid) young gay men. And “AIDS” will be over.

Here is how it reads at the BBC, and all agencies that parrot the propaganda from the NIH machine:

Drug ‘can greatly reduce risk of HIV infection’

Truvada, which is made California-based Gilead Sciences, combines two antiretroviral drugs.

* HIV epidemic ‘halted’, says UN
* Molecule structure hope for HIV

A drug used to treat HIV-positive patients may offer gay and bisexual men some protection against contracting the virus, the authors of a new study say.

What are the drugs? What are the effects? What is “some protection?” Against what, precisely? Testing HIV positive? But HIV tests come up positive for any and every illness. Will this stop “AIDS?” No, real “AIDS” – as in serious toxicological and environmental immune deficiency – will rage on, and Western nations will ignore it.

You can see an early analysis of the AIDS industry’s new move in this paper I researched and wrote a few years ago. It tells the rationale for drugging all neurotic and willing young gay men.

“Does the New York Times Want to Kill Gay Men?” GNN 2006

Here is how they proved their theory that all gay men should be drugged: The good laboratory scientists shoved some laboratory proteins up the rear ends of some macaque monkeys.

Voila.

What does all of it mean? It means that the mainstream is looking for a way out of the big stinking tent they’ve erected. They want to close down the house of death and pain that they’ve locked populations into for three decades. And they need to wave a magic wand to make the population think that there was a real, rational, ‘scientific’ reason that it ended.

Rather than revealing what has happened – the exposure of a fraud – they want to sell one more product.

So, are you buying?

AIDS Eugenics Industry’s Woman of the Year

by Liam Scheff

The AIDS Industry now wants to own all of women’s bodies; not only by drugging them before, during and after pregnancy, but by turning them into pill dispensers for their new-borns:

In order to reduce the transmission of HIV from mother to baby during breastfeeding, scientists are developing a low-cost, modified nipple shield which dispenses antiviral compounds. [link]

Read about the wondrous project, and other Eugenic works, at: http://justmilk.org/ as well as the UN population fund.

Oh, did anybody mention that HIV tests (which are used to validate the notion of “transmission”) come up positive for everything, and nothing? Including pregnancy?

Or that these drugs deform, distress and kill the grown men and women who take them?

Well, they already cut children’s stomachs open to take the drugs…I suppose it’s just a logical progression…

Modified pill-dispensing nipple-shields. Fraudulent tests. Population control and management – all for a good, honorable cause…

Gosh, I wonder what ideas they have in store for us, if we’d only let them?

Does AIDS Cause HIV?

by Liam Scheff for OMSJ.org

How we’ve gotten AIDS wrong for 25 years, and how to fix it…

Those ‘in the know,’ who read and scour and search the medical literature on AIDS and HIV testing, are well aware that neither of these belief systems works according to their promised plan. Here’s how it was supposed to go:

A single unique particle, (originally called LAV, then HTLV-III, then rechristened HIV) gets into the body via semen or blood exchange; it gravitates somehow to the white blood cells called T-Cells; it opens the cell door, somehow, and copies itself into the genome, using an enzyme called Reverse Transcriptase. These cells are then impaired, and die, supposedly. This weakens the body over time and other illnesses occur.

That’s the official narrative. But only more or less, because there are so many alterations and versions of the official story at this point that it’s hard to keep up. “Maybe cells aren’t killed directly, maybe latent infection is really active, maybe constant exposure causes immunity…” The official story has caused nothing but headaches and trauma for the mainstream, as it’s never held together, and no part of it is ably demonstrated or proven. In fact, most aspects of the story are countered by observation.

That is, there is no unique, purified, isolated, gold standard particle called “LAV,” or “HTLV-III,” or “HIV.” There are many divergent proteins that are grabbed out of blood samples through antibody testing, and a far greater number of genetic threads, copied out of cell cultures by a touchy, highly sensitive technology called PCR. All of these are supposed to be “HIV.”

This wild diversity of fragments gave CDC cop and New York Times pharma-shill Lawrence Altman the impetus to coin his second-most famous line: “HIV, the wily retrovirus.” (His first is “The virus that causes AIDS.“)

And right there you have the second major problem. AIDS is about, well, if I said 10,000 diseases, I’d be in the ballpark. It is a disease category as long as Pinocchio’s nose, and as deep as a the Grand Canyon. It grows at will, and can never be filled up – it grows and goes. Any disease can be called “AIDS” if it occurs in people who the medical cops think are “at risk for AIDS.”

HIV Profiling

That’s how it works – literally. You have a fungal toenail? Get treatment. You’re in a “risk group?” (Gay, black, drug-addict, or poor). Then, “It could be AIDS! Better get tested.” Otherwise, you’re just another shlub who drinks too much and has bad hygiene, so take an anti-fungal drug, and soak it in Epsom salts or some other concoction. But if you’re a gay male, you’re “at risk for AIDS,” so you get an HIV test. And then you’re in the stream – HIV death sentence, AIDS drugs, support groups, red ribbons, pharma bills, major side-effects and early (but sanctified) death.

You have a recurring sore throat, and you’re a black woman in the inner city ghetto? “Could be AIDS! Better get tested.” If you’re a straight white college girl or boy, you’ll be told to eat less sugar, that you could have weakened immunity, or Chronic Fatigue, or Epstein-Barr or Guillain–Barré Syndrome, or some other concoction of non-specific symptoms given a three-name moniker.

The mainstream has just about crucified itself revealing that it has no good solution to the ‘how does HIV cause AIDS’ question, when you put them on a pin, or under the spotlight. When they’re feeling particularly honest and generous, they’ll tell you that “There’s a great deal to be known that we do not already know,” and “the specific mechanisms remain elusive,” and, “It will require increased funding and may take years to solve this perplexing riddle,” and so on.

Meanwhile, when making public policy, they’re absolutely sure of it, and don’t wait to tell everyone in the world that HIV is a single particle which is the cause of a single disease, and so everyone (in a risk group) must be tested (meaning, in all practical senses, “The ghetto can line up here for testing, but walk away, wealthy people, walk away!”)

Read the Rest of This Article

For Gay Men, Even HIV Negative is HIV Positive

Below please find my 2003 interview with Dr. Dan Cohen, M.D. of Boston’s Fenway HIV/AIDS Clinic. (The interview was part of my research for The AIDS Debate series). You don’t have to guess where the clinic us located – no, not in Newton or Wellesley, home to the beautiful (straight) people. Yes, the clinic sits at the gateway to the beautiful and gentrified South End where a majority of young, urban, successful, working gay men make their homes and living.

The images you see interspersed are not parody ads created for this post – this is the face of Fenway Health’s public relations outreach/propaganda for its community. Talk about targeting a population….

Liam Scheff: What’s the process at the Fenway when someone tests positive for HIV?

Dr. Cohen: When someone is tested positive, they get counseling before and after, regarding the test process, they’re counseled regarding the possibility of getting a false negative when they’re really HIV infected.

Liam Scheff: How do they get a false negative?

Dr. Cohen: The HIV test is testing for antibodies, not for the presence of the HIV virus itself.

Liam Scheff: How does that equal a false negative? Continue reading For Gay Men, Even HIV Negative is HIV Positive