Terry Michael of the WCPJ asks ignoble Nobel Prize winner Francoise Barre-Sinoussi what she thinks about Luc Montagnier’s belief that natural anti-bodies can rid a human host of “HIV” in a few weeks. Video captured at the XIX International AIDS Conference in Washington, DC July 26, 2012.
RTB: We’ve seen HIV tests fall apart under scrutiny in court – now we see it in military court, with thanks to the OMSJ.
“Because the case law surrounding HIV was mostly developed at the height of the HIV/AIDS scare 20 years ago, the government’s evidence is usually filled with gaps because it relies upon a variety of assumptions. But the military’s current procedures for supposedly diagnosing people as HIV positive is scientifically, medically, and legally inadequate.”
– Eldon Beck, Captain, USMC, 24 Oct 2011
Two weeks after the Marine Corps dismissed all charges against Corporal RL, his attorney posted this report on the Marine Corps’ Defense Services Organization’s website. These reports are seen by all Marine attorneys worldwide, and its contents will likely be reviewed by all other DoD and military branches.
Captain Beck left no question about OMSJ’s impact in the case:
“Our success in challenging the HIV issues in our case is largely due to Clark Baker (a former Marine, retired LAPD investigator, and licensed CA PI), Baron Coleman (a young civilian lawyer with expertise challenging HIV prosecutions), and other members of Clark’s team at the Office of Medical and Scientific Justice (OMSJ). Without them, we would not have been able to effectively challenge the HIV testing, chain of custody, and alleged diagnosis of our client… You should contact (OMSJ) immediately if you are detailed to an HIV-related case.”
Because of the incompetence that exists within HIV clinics, hospitals and the NIH and CDC, OMSJ is not concerned about sharing it’s investigative strategy with prosecutors or alleged “HIV experts” who are called to testify as prosecution witnesses. In fact, if prosecutors and their witnesses memorize OMSJ’s strategy, they would not file criminal HIV charges against anyone.
Capt. Beck concludes:
“(A)n HIV case is NOT a slam dunk for the government. Get the right HIV experts on your team and you will probably be able to kill the case before trial. If the government is reckless enough to go to trial, you will probably be able to get a strong win for your client.”
Capt. Beck’s complete summary is posted here.
Get your piping hot download of “House of Numbers,” the award-winning ass-kicking documentary by Brent Leung that takes on the corrupt AIDS medical establishment and shows ’em what for…
And get ready for the expanded, all-you-can-eat DVD release, with 32 featurettes not seen in theaters, including hours of exclusive interviews, bonus research material – PLUS flying monkeys!! (Or maybe not flying monkeys, but yes to everything else – see the complete description at House of Numbers.com).
Excerpt from How AIDS Didn’t Become A Kissing Disease (for OMSJ.org):
AIDS – The Kissing Disease?
It should be noted that Gonda and Gallo’s picture [below] is of “HTVL-III” (later called “HIV”) in human saliva. The paper notes: “Virus was also isolated from the saliva of eight of the 18 individuals who were seropositive for HTLV-III-specific antibodies…from the saliva of four of the ARC patients and four of the healthy homosexuals.” That is, if you believe any of their research at all, we carry infectious “HIV” in our mouths. Is this something we’re told by the AIDS establishment?
Twenty-five years of AIDS research have demonstrated the following: Gallo’s “HTLV-III” has no particular, reproducible size or gene sequence; the proteins that are supposed to belong to it and it alone are found in almost every human disease and condition. The “LAV/HTLV-III/HIV” proteins and gene sequences have to be cobbled together through ‘consensus agreement’ among different labs because while fishing in beaten-up cell cultures, researches always find different things to call “HIV.”
Finally, “HIV” in any or all of its forms, has never been shown to even remotely affect T-Cells, which is the only meaningful prediction of AIDS theory. But none of this has mattered to AIDS researchers, because AIDS theory is about fear, politics and social control, and has never been about science.