Tag Archives: hiv

Pitch the Baby – An HIV Bedtime Story

by Terry Michael

“this is not the cure you are looking for”

Fauci reports Mississippi baby is un-cured of HIV. “Still more research needed.”

The HIV-AIDS Industry is in a state of shock, as it prepares for its biennial AIDSFest, July 20-25 in Melbourne (the 20th International AIDS Society conference.)

At the National Allergy and Infectious Diseases web site Thursday (July 10), AIDS-czar-for-life (since Nov. 3, 1984), Dr.Anthony Fauci, lamented that his much vaunted “proof of concept” of a HIV “functional cure” is now just another setback, requiring….you guessed it…more research!

From the NIAID full press release, my emphasis added:

“Certainly, this is a disappointing turn of events for this young child, the medical staff involved in the child’s care, and the HIV/AIDS research community,” said NIAID Director Anthony S. Fauci, M.D. “Scientifically, this development reminds us that we still have much more to learn about the intricacies of HIV infection and where the virus hides in the body. The NIH remains committed to moving forward with research on a cure for HIV infection.”

That wily HIV skillfully “hides” in “reservoirs” in the body, stealthily lurking about until it unexpectedly rears its ugly head, according to pseudo scientists like Fauci–who has squandered scores of billions of taxpayer dollars in his three decades as NIAID director, during which time both a “cure” and a “vaccine” have eluded our intrepid AIDS czar.

You will recall Fauci’s excitement in March 2013, when Mississippi pediatrician (and former Baptist missionary to Africa) Dr. Hannah Gay engaged in outrageous medical malpractice, apparently in her missionary zeal for faith-healing a 30-hour-old baby with a highly toxic cocktail of AZT and other ARV chemotherapy, without so much as a so-called “HIV test.” It was a “gutsy call,” the good doctor Fauci was quoted as saying at the time (“gutsy,” as in “insane?!”)

Since that time, Fauci has allocated more millions for more human baby research, of which he promises even more. In addition to experiments on tiny infants, Fauci continues to tout “pre[HIV]-exposure prophylaxis” (PrEP) for HIV antibody NEGATIVE gay men, IV drug users, Sub Saharan Africans, African American women, and other victims of the magical, mystical bug called the “probable cause of AIDS” by U.S. government declaration on April 23, 1984.

I de-construct the PrEP madness here, including Fauci’s crony capitalist collusion with the PrEPy, peppy “Truvada” drug dealers at politically-connected Gilead Sciences of Foster City, CA, whose CEO John C. Martin was placed by Fauci on his NIAID Advisory Council 14 years ago: AIDS War Profiteering by Terry Michael, July 2014

When will this insanity end?

— Terry Michael, Executive Director
Washington Center for Politics & Journalism
WCPJ WEB: www.wcpj.org

The Complete HIV Breakdown with Dr. Rashid Buttar, Robert Scott Bell and Liam Scheff

Incredible show today with Robert Scott Bell and Dr. Rashid Buttar.

Please download and listen to the bonus segment, as Dr. Rashid Buttar, RSB and Liam take apart, for good and all, the HIV myth. No sugar. It’s a great show.

How many needle-pricks from “HIV” patients can a person have an not be “Positive?” How often can you have sex with “HIV” positive people and not turn “positive”

Answer: As many as you’d like, because there is no HIV. There are only HIV tests…

The first hour of the interview will be available here in archives for Aug 20th:

Here’s the 40 minutes of bonus “HIV” breakdown. We even talk Kim Cools and Umlingo Wamangcolosi!

Terry Michael of the WCPJ asks the AIDS Establishment an Honest Question

Terry Michael of the WCPJ asks ignoble Nobel Prize winner Francoise Barre-Sinoussi what she thinks about Luc Montagnier’s belief that natural anti-bodies can rid a human host of “HIV” in a few weeks. Video captured at the XIX International AIDS Conference in Washington, DC July 26, 2012.

Screwing More HIV Positives is Good For You, Says AIDS Establishment (Or, What to Wear When the Mainstream Commits Suicide)

RTB: We don’t even begin to know what to do when the mainstream begins to openly commit public suicide, but cheer.

From PLoS Pathogens, and a cancer research group in Seattle, we now have the following theory:

Have sex with as many HIV positives as possible, to protect you from…yes, that’s right. HIV.

No, you don’t misunderstand. This is what they’re saying:

“Women who have been infected by two different strains of HIV from two different sexual partners – a condition known as HIV superinfection – have more potent antibody responses that block the replication of the virus compared to women who’ve only been infected once.”

Yes. Get “infected” over and over again. Yes, that is what they’re saying. Because the whole thing is a Sham, and always has been.

Do you need them to spell it out for you? They’ve been lying to you for 30 years.

“The study suggests that harboring a mixture of different viral strains may be one way to promote a robust antibody response. The findings also suggest that being infected with two different HIV strains not only leads to a strong response, but also a more rapid response that is capable of recognizing many other HIV strains. “

Yup. So, if you’re going to screw, screw twice. And then you’ll be protected. By antibodies. To something that doesn’t exist.

Hey Anthony Fauci, please, go screw yourself, maybe that will help you become less of a eugenicist.

(Fauci is head of NIH and has destroyed millions of lives worldwide with criminally fraudulent HIV tests, and he’s just one of hundreds of bogus researchers stealing tax money to murder people, with their ignorant ‘consent’ of course.)

Back to the funny papers. I personally have got to get to the “HIV” clinic and find at LEAST two people to have sex with. Because then I’ll be protected. From HIV.

The original article:

SEATTLE – Women who have been infected by two different strains of HIV from two different sexual partners – a condition known as HIV superinfection – have more potent antibody responses that block the replication of the virus compared to women who’ve only been infected once. These findings, by researchers at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, are published online March 29 in PLoS Pathogens.

“We found that women who had been infected twice not only had more potent antibody responses, but some of these women had ‘elite’ antibody activity, meaning that they had a broad and potent ability to neutralize a wide variety of strains of HIV over a sustained period time,” said senior author Julie Overbaugh, Ph.D., a member of the Hutchinson Center’s Human Biology Division. It is estimated that only about 1 percent of people with HIV are so-called “elite neutralizers” who are able to potently neutralize multiple subtypes of the virus.

“Individuals who become superinfected with a second virus from a different partner represent a unique opportunity for studying the antibody response and may provide insights into the process of developing broad neutralizing antibodies that could inform HIV-vaccine design,” she said.

The study suggests that harboring a mixture of different viral strains may be one way to promote a robust antibody response. The findings also suggest that being infected with two different HIV strains not only leads to a strong response, but also a more rapid response that is capable of recognizing many other HIV strains.

The researchers tracked the immune activity of 12 superinfected women from Mombasa, Kenya, over a five-year period and compared each to a control group of three singly infected women. Overbaugh and lead author Valerie Cortez, a doctoral student in her lab, assessed the ability of antibodies present in superinfected and singly infected women to neutralize a spectrum of circulating HIV-1 variants. In doing so they were able to determine whether the presence of two viruses compared to one made a difference in immune response. The researchers controlled for variables such as antibody response prior to superinfection and biomarkers of immunity such as CD4+ T cell count and viral load.

The study found that superinfected women had, on average, 1.68 times more neutralizing antibodies than non-superinfected women, and they scored much higher in their ability to neutralize the virus – superinfected women had 1.46 times greater potency than the singly infected women.

More than 1.1 million Americans are estimated to be living with HIV today, and every nine-and-a-half minutes someone in the U.S. becomes infected, according to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. An HIV vaccine is considered the best approach to long-term protection from HIV infection, but attempts to develop such a vaccine so far have meet with limited success.

“The holy grail of an HIV vaccine is to elicit antibodies to the virus because antibodies have been shown to block virus infection. But there has been little progress in determining how to elicit such antibodies with a vaccine. The study of individuals HIV infected who have developed strong antibody responses to the virus may shed light on the best approach to design a vaccine that will induce an effective immune response,” Overbaugh said. http://www.eurekalert.org/

You heard the man; go get screwing.

Oh, you can contact them, if you want to point out how broken their paradigm is:

Contact: Kristen Woodward

kwoodwar@fhcrc.org

206-667-5095

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

Study finds HIV ‘superinfection’ boosts immune response

Findings may provide insight into HIV-vaccine development

HIV Test Fraud Liberation Day

by Liam Scheff
for the Robert Scott Bell Show and Natural News

It may come as a shock to realize that if everyone in the world who was supposed to be HIV positive, suddenly no longer cared about this designation, and returned the diagnosis and red ribbon to the doctor or clinician who gave it to them, that no further infections would occur, no HIV would be spread, and the entire notion of this virus would disappear entirely. What would be left in this scenario is not a world plagued by HIV infection, but a world in which many people are ill for many reasons: Poverty, pharmaceutical poisoning, street drug abuse, toxic environmental poisoning, pure starvation, filthy parasite-ridden water and fear. A fear promulgated and propagated by the AIDS medical front.

We on the Robert Scott Bell Show are proud to present a new video documentary release from the “House of Numbers” special edition film series – “HIV Testing Exposed, Revealed and Deconstructed.”

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OajiyoWmKiE
Vimeo: http://vimeo.com/32537863

What are HIV tests? What do they do?

They are protein tests – they look for reactions between proteins in the test kits, and proteins in your blood.

But where do the proteins come from? The answer will astound, and possibly liberate you, and anyone you know who has ever been given one of these fraudulent tests.

In the course of two hours, we hear from AIDS industry and medical experts, who in their own words reveal in no uncertain terms that HIV tests are a complete and utter fraud – a game of three-card-monty, that overlay a cult-like belief system, a myth – the myth that AIDS is a transmissible sex disease.

AIDS – acquired immune deficiency – is real enough, and easy to ‘acquire’ through many means – through drug, pharma, water, food poisoning; through prolonged intoxication with chemicals, or restriction of essential nutrients.

But while immune deficiency is quite real, HIV is entirely fake. Does this statement surprise you? Shock you? In the course of two hours, investigative journalist Liam Scheff, and host Robert Scott Bell will walk you through the experts on parade, as they tell you, in their own words, how the HIV test was constructed out of entirely normal proteins, that occur in both sick and healthy people. These proteins were supposed to come from one virus – but they come from a witch’s brew of cultured, contaminated cell lines in government laboratories, which had been growing for most of the 1970s. They were useless proteins looking for an illness to attach themselves to. Why? To keep the funding going.

The CDC was saved from destitution by the invention of the “HIV” paradigm. The World Health Organization has grown into a world policing, economic weapon of war, in light of their ability to ruin nations with make-believe “HIV” tests, (and the SARS, Bird and Swine flu tests that followed suit). Much of the ‘third world’ has been made into pharma slave states, because we have been given this profoundly effective myth: That sex is dangerous for some people, and so they must be tested.

But what are we testing them with, and what for?

You will hear Hans Gelderblom, electron microscopist, admit on camera that what became HIV tests, was from the beginning, “Eighty Percent Dirt.” You will hear Ph.D. researchers describe the invention (by fiat, and consensus agreement) of “HIV proteins,” out of normally-occuring cellular proteins. And you will hear the high priests of “HIV,” Robert Gallo, Luc Montagnier and their peers, describe HIV tests as entirely flawed Rube Goldberg devices – one leading to another, leading to another, all in an attempt to create an overwhelming conclusion that a dozen useless tests must be more meaningful than just one.

When they know the truth: A dozen times a fraud is an even more profound fraud – and this fraud is now being perpetrated against Africans, Indians, Chinese, Eastern and Western Europeans, South and North Americans, and citizens worldwide, with entirely disgraced ‘rapid tests,’ now used in vans and at folding tables in parking lots, to grab the poorly-educated and hurl them into the pharmaceutical maw.

On World AIDS Day, we at the Robert Scott Bell show declare a worldwide moratorium on HIV testing — you can now download this show, and the House of Numbers exclusive HIV testing video, walk it into your clinician, your doctor, your school, workplace, your CEO or C.O.’s office; bring it to social studies, science and math classes, discourse and debate clubs; post them on your webpage and blogs, burn them onto CDs and MP3 players, and spread the word.

Turn in your HIV test result. Return it to the manufacturer. After all, they’ll tell you in the fine print that it is a ‘diagnosis’ with no value at all. And begin to reclaim your life, sanity, and your sexual identity – it is not the government’s right or responsibility to decide for you how you shall choose a partner, nor how you shall be drugged.

Take this information, and spread the well-described and understood reality of HIV testing: It is an absolute, irredeemable  fraud. And if you are ill, and have any kind of immune deficiency, your challenge is to slowly but concretely educate yourself about the illnesses that plague us in our modern world. Illnesses of toxic exposure, from denatured and chemically altered food, polluted water and air, and chronic exposure to gut-rending pharmaceuticals.

We on the Robert Scott Bell show will continue to talk about how to recover from immune deficiency. It is a challenge for all of us. What we need to do for the innocent victims of the HIV test fraud, is to NULLIFY that false label, and let them have the mental space and sanity to pursue health without being chased by the pharma nightmare that is daily inflicted upon so-called “AIDS patients.”

This is going to be a two hours like no other we’ve done. We will plumb the depths of the HIV testing fraud, and let the mainstream, in their own words, describe it to you, and release you from it.

Join us today at 12pm EST, and then downloadable for your MP3 player, on NaturalNewsRadio.com for World HIV Fraud Day.

And spread the word, by sharing the broadcast and the “House of Numbers” documentary with everyone you know, at every level of professional life in your town, village or burg, wherever you live in the world.

Join us to listen, and later click on the Robert Scott Bell archives link for the show download.

And remember – the power to heal truly is yours. And the power to turn in your HIV diagnosis, belongs to you, today.

Video:

Websites:

Articles:

Breaking News: HIV Tests Do Not Hold Up In Military Court

RTB: We’ve seen HIV tests fall apart under scrutiny in court – now we see it in military court, with thanks to the OMSJ.

by OMSJ

“Because the case law surrounding HIV was mostly developed at the height of the HIV/AIDS scare 20 years ago, the government’s evidence is usually filled with gaps because it relies upon a variety of assumptions.  But the military’s current procedures for supposedly diagnosing people as HIV positive is scientifically, medically, and legally inadequate.”

– Eldon Beck, Captain, USMC, 24 Oct 2011

Two weeks after the Marine Corps dismissed all charges against Corporal RL, his attorney posted this report on the Marine Corps’ Defense Services Organization’s website.  These reports are seen by all Marine attorneys worldwide, and its contents will likely be reviewed by all other DoD and military branches.

Captain Beck left no question about OMSJ’s impact in the case:

“Our success in challenging the HIV issues in our case is largely due to Clark Baker (a former Marine, retired LAPD investigator, and licensed CA PI), Baron Coleman (a young civilian lawyer with expertise challenging HIV prosecutions), and other members of Clark’s team at the Office of Medical and Scientific Justice (OMSJ). Without them, we would not have been able to effectively challenge the HIV testing, chain of custody, and alleged diagnosis of our client…  You should contact (OMSJ) immediately if you are detailed to an HIV-related case.”

Because of the incompetence that exists within HIV clinics, hospitals and the NIH and CDC, OMSJ is not concerned about sharing it’s investigative strategy with prosecutors or alleged “HIV experts” who are called to testify as prosecution witnesses.  In fact, if prosecutors and their witnesses memorize OMSJ’s strategy, they would not file criminal HIV charges against anyone.

Capt. Beck concludes:

“(A)n HIV case is NOT a slam dunk for the government.   Get the right HIV experts on your team and you will probably be able to kill the case before trial.  If the government is reckless enough to go to trial, you will probably be able to get a strong win for your client.”

Capt. Beck’s complete summary is posted here.

We Really All Are “HIV Positive.”

by Liam Scheff

We really all are “HIV positive.”Think about it. What does “HIV positive” really mean to people. It means:

1) You’re going to die one day; someday, you don’t know when precisely. But it will happen, and you will be sad.

2) Sex is no longer safe for you, and you have to tell people that you are damaged.

 Well, what’s the news?

We’re all going to die one day; there is nothing anybody can do about that. And sex is dangerous for all of us. And it always has been.

You can break your heart, your soul, give too much, risk too much, give too little, reveal your damages, weaknesses, frailties; get pregnant, get an actual STD.

Of course sex is inherently dangerous. We don’t need a bullsh*t test (that doesn’t test for anything) to figure that out for us.

And we really do all ‘test’ HIV positive, if you don’t dilute the blood samples. Run the blood samples as is, or at a low dilution, and we all have the damned protein/antibody reactions:

“Since all undiluted blood specimens react positive on the ELISA test, a test that supposedly tests for antibodies to HIV, the results presented here suggest that every single human being has HIV antibodies. And this suggests that everybody has been exposed to HIV antigens. ” [Link]

I asked an “AIDS specialist” about this too. Dr. Cohen, who ran or runs the gay men’s clinic in Boston, said the same thing. “We all test positive if you don’t dilute the sample?” I asked. “Yes, that’s the way it works,” he said. [Link]

So, “HIV” is just another way of stating the ancient reality – Life has a time limit, so live it. Don’t sit in front of the TV waiting to die, or to live. And sex is inherently risky. The 60s didn’t change that.

And of course you’ll get sick if you have sex with 30 people a week – or a night – and do drugs all the time. Big freaking surprise.

Wake up AIDS morons. It’s called the human condition.

HIV is Just a Mammary

by Liam Scheff

Aids Industry to You: Take your pick, and suck liberally.

File under, “Puke me a river:”

Breast milk antibody both neutralizes human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and kills HIV-infected cells, according to a paper in the September 2011 issue of the Journal of Virology.” http://www.asm.org/

So, the AIDS Industry (and complicit media) have killed thousands of women and hundreds of thousands of gay men with drugs… because breast milk ‘stops hiv?’

I think even most gay men would’ve taken a glug, if the Nazi med establishment had offered boob juice instead of AZT.

So, Aids is…over?

Tell RA to give articles like this first billing. I mean, never mind RA…!! Who needs ’em when you’ve got the world med establishment doing its best to kill HIV.

But wait, there’s more (money to be made):

“This finding indicates that enhancement of these responses through vaccination could help reduce HIV transmission via breastfeeding,” says corresponding author Sallie Permar of Duke University, Durham, NC. While HIV-specific antibodies have been identified in breast milk, this is the first study to investigate the virus-blocking functions of these antibodies.

Now, it’s the vaccine! Yes, it’s a vaccine sale, plus breast milk, that will kill HIV. Or, so says this piece of writ… Never mind that the vaccine efforts have been massive public failures – and make no sense (“HIV” infection is determined by antibodies. Vaccines are supposed to work by producing antibodies. Why a vaccine? Because people are willfully stupid. Incredibly gullible. Wildly uninterested in thinking critically. Motivated by fear and tribal identification. Ta-da!)

But wait! It’s been breast milk for years:

Sugar-containing compounds in breast milk may reduce the transmission of HIV to suckling babies, suggests a lab-based study.

Milk is already known to contain some substances that quell HIV. “Breast milk has all sorts of good stuff in it, such as antibodies from the mother,” says Louise Kuhn, who studies HIV transmission at Columbia University in New York.

Now Bill Paxton at the University of Amsterdam and his colleagues have homed in on anti-HIV compounds in milk that seem particularly powerful. They say the secret ingredient is Lewis X, a type of sugar also found in saliva and blood. http://www.nature.com

Wait wait wait….Wait. The “secret ingredient” to stopping HIV is “a type of sugar also found in saliva and blood?”Excuuuuuse me? So…wha? How? Why? We’ve killed hundreds of thousands and terrorized millions because… because… because???

But it’s still not good enough to allow African women to breast-feed. Nope, gotta kill them…uhm, ‘treat’ them with AZT.

You see, breast milk is good, but it’s also bad, so it must be mixed with stuff injected into infants. Or adults. Or, just spray breast milk on your privates:

But if the results hold true in further studies, they could lead to new ways to block transmission of HIV between adults during sex. “If it does work as a microbicide, it would be a great tool”

Or just have sex while bleeding. Or, use plenty of saliva. And if you don’t like any of those, just use copper:

Researchers from the U.S. and abroad have developed an inexpensive copper-based filter that may prevent HIV from being passed through breast milk and blood. They report their findings in the February 2008 issue of the journal Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. http://www.healthnewstrack.com/health-news-358.html

Just suck on a penny while you make whoopie. Or, eat a banana.

Your favorite oblong fruit might be even healthier than you realized. According to The Gazette (Montreal) newspaper, a new study has found that chemicals commonly found in bananas are as potent in preventing HIV as two synthetic anti-HIV drugs. Researchers say the findings could lead to a cheap new component for applied microbicides that prevent sexual transmission of HIV.

The miracle substance in bananas is called BanLec, a type of lectin, which are the sugar-binding proteins found in a variety of plants. Scientists have long been interested in lectins because of their ability to halt the chain reaction that leads to certain viral infections. In the case of BanLec, it works by binding naturally to the sugar-rich envelope that encases the HIV virus, thus blocking its entry into the body.

“The problem with some HIV drugs is that the virus can mutate and become resistant, but that’s much harder to do in the presence of lectins,” said lead author Michael D. Swanson. “Lectins can bind to the sugars found on different spots of the HIV-1 envelope, and presumably it will take multiple mutations for the virus to get around them.” http://www.mnn.com

 

Right. Bananas. Milk. Pennies. Fill in punchline. Or just stop giving people the bleeding tests, because they don’t mean a damned thing...

Abbot Labs 2006 HIV Test

Abbott Labs

“At present there is no recognized standard for establishing the presence or absence of antibodies to HIV-1 and HIV-2 in human blood.”

“The risk of an asymptomatic [not chronically ill] person with a repeatedly reactive [positive] serum sample developing AIDS or an AIDS-related condition is not known”

“Clinical studies continue to clarify and refine the interpretation and medical significance of the presence of antibodies to HIV.”

“AIDS and AIDS-related conditions are clinical syndromes and their diagnosis can only be established clinically. EIA testing [that’s this test] cannot be used to diagnose AIDS, even if the recommended investigation of reactive specimens suggest that the antibodies to HIV are present.”

So…Can we all start having sex without punishing gay men, and pregnant women – and all of Africa?

All hear ye! End HIV testing, return your HIV ‘diagnosis’ to your doctor, and let them know that you’re getting a second opinion from somebody who bothers to read the medical literature.

* Thanks to the great Terry Michael, for providing the breast milk article at the top and inspiring the conversation.

Does the NIH Want to Kill All Gay Men (or is it Just Tired of Selling AIDS to the General Public)?

by Liam Scheff

The AIDS industry has been so firmly exposed by the work of whistle-blowers, medical activists, scientists, researchers and journalists, it’s more naked than Lady Godiva after a rude haircut; it’s more nude than the Emperor who wore no clothes on the day he decided to really let it all hang out…

It’s more exposed than… well, you get the point.

But thanks to the terrific work of hundreds of individuals to demand transparency in this rotten paradigm, and research and news websites like RTB, Henry Bauer’s excellent site and book, T.I.G. South Africa, The Perth Group, Rethinking AIDS, NotAIDS, ARAS.ca.ab, and more (add yours in comments, please, if I’ve missed it), the truth about AIDS is becoming well known.

And what’s the truth about AIDS? It is this: AIDS is a multi-factorial, complex toxicological immune problem, or series of problems – that has no single cause, and no single viral cause.

HIV is a construct, mostly mental at this point, of loosely-associated laboratory material, cobbled together in academic papers and models; “it” is really a “many,” as in many proteins, genetic strands and loose material that have been associated, in some people, and only some people, with immune deficiency. “HIV” was once called a ‘tumor virus,’ but that it didn’t cause tumors, it was re-labeled a ‘retrovirus,’ but that it had no stable size, shape or form, it passed into being a “Trojan Exosome” – ie, a variety of protein bubbles manufactured in all human cells under stress.

In other words, the variety of things called HIV are made by you, from you, in you, and are most likely cellular messengers. There is no single, identifiable “HIV,” there are only many “HIVs,” none of which eat, screw or chomp on T-Cells. They’re probably more like emails from cell to cell; or perhaps messages to the immune system. Or articles of epigenetic adjustment or ‘evolution’ within the body.

The mainstream got it wrong from the start. They labeled a loose construction of debris as one important thing. They mislabeled the ‘exosomal’ process as a deadly viral process. They mistook what was important as a messaging system for what they were hoping to find – a deadly viral cause of cancer. When these fragments turned out to cause zero and no cancers, the AIDS true-believers simply changed their theory again. “HIV” (all, any, some and whichever), would “kill T-Cells.” This was their theory. And it has been dead from day one.

And so, the mainstream has moved from telling the world that HIV causes AIDS by “directly” killing T-Cells. When they failed to demonstrate anything resembling that theory, they held tight and said that perhaps T-Cells were being “indirectly affected” through unknown means.

The latest incarnation of AIDS theory offers that “HIV” might actually “stimulate” the immune system! Thereby causing…??

But these rotten children cannot publicly let go of their failed theory – or they’ll pay with their careers. And so, they continue to “first do harm,” by drugging all “HIV positives” to death over time, and often quickly.

AIDS, Inc: “Making People Sick is Our Business”

The AIDS lobby and pharma mafia that do their public and very dirty work have driven hundreds of thousands to early graves by drugging them mercilessly with the world’s most toxic ‘Black Box’ prescription drugs. While those who sought treatment through detoxification, a la the Pauling method, updated and improved by Matthias Rath, have been vilified, cursed, and literally wished dead by the very AIDS lobbyists who pin sacred ‘red ribbons’ on everything they do and touch – and sell. But their real interest in AIDS is the following:

“Every death is a victory; every illness ‘proof’ of their cause.”

Nevertheless, they’ve been whittled down from their mount, by public exposure. The recent documentary “House of Numbers” put in living color, at 24 frames per second, the AIDS industry in their own words. And it was a terrible blow for the masters of deceit at the NIH, such as is presided over by ‘Capo’ Anthony Fauci.

And so, what to do, what to do?

They’ve got to find a way to grind it to a halt. And so they are.

The news is now this: “HIV” is preventable, if only gay men will self-suicide all the days of their lives. That is, they must pre-drug with AIDS drugs. Yes, the same deadly “Black Box” drugs will now be taken by perfectly healthy (but deeply paranoid) young gay men. And “AIDS” will be over.

Here is how it reads at the BBC, and all agencies that parrot the propaganda from the NIH machine:

Drug ‘can greatly reduce risk of HIV infection’

Truvada, which is made California-based Gilead Sciences, combines two antiretroviral drugs.

* HIV epidemic ‘halted’, says UN
* Molecule structure hope for HIV

A drug used to treat HIV-positive patients may offer gay and bisexual men some protection against contracting the virus, the authors of a new study say.

What are the drugs? What are the effects? What is “some protection?” Against what, precisely? Testing HIV positive? But HIV tests come up positive for any and every illness. Will this stop “AIDS?” No, real “AIDS” – as in serious toxicological and environmental immune deficiency – will rage on, and Western nations will ignore it.

You can see an early analysis of the AIDS industry’s new move in this paper I researched and wrote a few years ago. It tells the rationale for drugging all neurotic and willing young gay men.

“Does the New York Times Want to Kill Gay Men?” GNN 2006

Here is how they proved their theory that all gay men should be drugged: The good laboratory scientists shoved some laboratory proteins up the rear ends of some macaque monkeys.

Voila.

What does all of it mean? It means that the mainstream is looking for a way out of the big stinking tent they’ve erected. They want to close down the house of death and pain that they’ve locked populations into for three decades. And they need to wave a magic wand to make the population think that there was a real, rational, ‘scientific’ reason that it ended.

Rather than revealing what has happened – the exposure of a fraud – they want to sell one more product.

So, are you buying?

A Shooting Gallery and an Hour Glass – Part Two

RTB is presents part two from a long-term observer and participant in the AIDS war, who has written an explorative, insightful essay in two parts for ReduceTheBurden.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

A Shooting Gallery and an Hour-Glass Part Two
One HIV Skeptics Continuing Journey

By William A.
for RTB

The Hour-Glass

Over the years, I began to notice the feeling that AIDS dissidents–particularly those with an ‘HIV’ diagnosis aimed at their head–seem almost shackled invisibly together… joined like some godforsaken chain-gang on a remote, dusty highway: When one of us stumbles, we all seem to lose our footing. When one of us falls we all feel vertigo. Someone else’s illness can beckon almost unconsciously, dancing off in the distance like a dark mirage…promising…shimmering…waiting. We seem to obsess about the health of other dissidents, revealing, in our often slightly mad speculation about what might be going on, this invisible connection to each others’ wellness. Or illness. An umbilical cord of wary hope. Or suppressed despair. As though someone else’s ability to survive the rain of death and hopelessness falling on us every day can make it more likely that we will defy the odds ourselves. Like anyone would, we find strength in numbers.

Nothing revealed this more powerfully to me than Christine Maggiore’s death. All these years she had soldiered on through a sea of hatred and vitriol, somehow not going completely mad from the intense scrutiny from the AIDS machine. Yet equally intense, if not more, was the almost unconscious scrutiny of many dissidents. We often live immersed in fear: this diagnosis is like being cast out into a sea of anxiety, a sea that can seem to extend beyond the horizon and it swallows people whole. Though many of us find ways to subdue the monstrous anxiety, I did notice how often others around me would ‘point’, somewhat nervously, to Christine as evidence that one could stay healthy, their trembling finger betraying the fear they felt that it was all somehow going to go pear-shaped anyway. There was a watchfulness about it. A kind of expectant waiting.

Unconsciously, many of us seemed to keep looking at her and then ‘looking at our watches’. I often wondered if she felt pressure to be the exception, or if she felt the many quiet, lonely hands clinging to her for reassurance and hope. I can’t see how it wouldn’t have been an enormous burden, however unintended it may have been by those who so understandably needed some signal, some sign of hope in a world awash with the expectation of early death that comes with this diagnosis.

I can’t help but be reminded of that, creepy scene in The Wizard of Oz, where the Wicked Witch of the West traps Dorothy in the tower-room and gingerly turns the Hour-Glass over and places it on the table, starting it flowing and saying evilly:

“Do you see that?  That’s how much longer you’ve got to be alive!  And it isn’t long, my pretty!  It isn’t long!” Continue reading A Shooting Gallery and an Hour Glass – Part Two

A Shooting Gallery and an Hour Glass – Part One

RTB is pleased to present a considered piece of writing from a long-term observer and participant in the AIDS war, who has written an explorative, insightful essay in two parts for ReduceTheBurden.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Toronto, 1978

I had a horrible nightmare when I was about 13 years old. I found myself in a large, darkly lit space, a room eerily filled with anxiety and dread. It had no windows and no doors, but for one: on a landing at the top of a single flight of about a dozen steps. There was something behind that door. Something powerful, something terrible.

I wasn’t sure…I walked up the stairs, shaking with fear, feeling horribly exposed and vulnerable. I had to open the door. I had to see what was there. I made my way to the top, and stood there, trembling, and reached for the door-knob. I would open that door. I would face whatever was waiting there…

Yet somehow after a huge effort, I just couldn’t do it. The uncertainty of what lay beyond that looming door was just too terrifying.

And then I awoke. Continue reading A Shooting Gallery and an Hour Glass – Part One

Does AIDS Cause HIV?

by Liam Scheff for OMSJ.org

How we’ve gotten AIDS wrong for 25 years, and how to fix it…

Those ‘in the know,’ who read and scour and search the medical literature on AIDS and HIV testing, are well aware that neither of these belief systems works according to their promised plan. Here’s how it was supposed to go:

A single unique particle, (originally called LAV, then HTLV-III, then rechristened HIV) gets into the body via semen or blood exchange; it gravitates somehow to the white blood cells called T-Cells; it opens the cell door, somehow, and copies itself into the genome, using an enzyme called Reverse Transcriptase. These cells are then impaired, and die, supposedly. This weakens the body over time and other illnesses occur.

That’s the official narrative. But only more or less, because there are so many alterations and versions of the official story at this point that it’s hard to keep up. “Maybe cells aren’t killed directly, maybe latent infection is really active, maybe constant exposure causes immunity…” The official story has caused nothing but headaches and trauma for the mainstream, as it’s never held together, and no part of it is ably demonstrated or proven. In fact, most aspects of the story are countered by observation.

That is, there is no unique, purified, isolated, gold standard particle called “LAV,” or “HTLV-III,” or “HIV.” There are many divergent proteins that are grabbed out of blood samples through antibody testing, and a far greater number of genetic threads, copied out of cell cultures by a touchy, highly sensitive technology called PCR. All of these are supposed to be “HIV.”

This wild diversity of fragments gave CDC cop and New York Times pharma-shill Lawrence Altman the impetus to coin his second-most famous line: “HIV, the wily retrovirus.” (His first is “The virus that causes AIDS.“)

And right there you have the second major problem. AIDS is about, well, if I said 10,000 diseases, I’d be in the ballpark. It is a disease category as long as Pinocchio’s nose, and as deep as a the Grand Canyon. It grows at will, and can never be filled up – it grows and goes. Any disease can be called “AIDS” if it occurs in people who the medical cops think are “at risk for AIDS.”

HIV Profiling

That’s how it works – literally. You have a fungal toenail? Get treatment. You’re in a “risk group?” (Gay, black, drug-addict, or poor). Then, “It could be AIDS! Better get tested.” Otherwise, you’re just another shlub who drinks too much and has bad hygiene, so take an anti-fungal drug, and soak it in Epsom salts or some other concoction. But if you’re a gay male, you’re “at risk for AIDS,” so you get an HIV test. And then you’re in the stream – HIV death sentence, AIDS drugs, support groups, red ribbons, pharma bills, major side-effects and early (but sanctified) death.

You have a recurring sore throat, and you’re a black woman in the inner city ghetto? “Could be AIDS! Better get tested.” If you’re a straight white college girl or boy, you’ll be told to eat less sugar, that you could have weakened immunity, or Chronic Fatigue, or Epstein-Barr or Guillain–Barré Syndrome, or some other concoction of non-specific symptoms given a three-name moniker.

The mainstream has just about crucified itself revealing that it has no good solution to the ‘how does HIV cause AIDS’ question, when you put them on a pin, or under the spotlight. When they’re feeling particularly honest and generous, they’ll tell you that “There’s a great deal to be known that we do not already know,” and “the specific mechanisms remain elusive,” and, “It will require increased funding and may take years to solve this perplexing riddle,” and so on.

Meanwhile, when making public policy, they’re absolutely sure of it, and don’t wait to tell everyone in the world that HIV is a single particle which is the cause of a single disease, and so everyone (in a risk group) must be tested (meaning, in all practical senses, “The ghetto can line up here for testing, but walk away, wealthy people, walk away!”)

Read the Rest of This Article