Tag Archives: HIV Test

The Cooties Test

Finally, the convenience of a Cooties test, right in your home!

Precautions:

  • If this test is positive, it does not mean that you have the Cooties. You must see a Cooties professional.
  • If this test is negative, it does not mean that you do not have the Cooties. You must continue to test regularly if you are engaging in high-risk Cooties behavior.

Thank you for buying the Cooties test. Keep coming back! We want your money!

http://www.oraquick.com/Warnings-and-Precautions

HIV Super-duper Rapid Nanotechnology Test (Fraud!)

by Liam Scheff

The HIV police are coming for you! They’ve got a “nanotechnology rapid test!” Yes, they can tell you in SECONDS if you’re…Right – not infected with anything specific at all – because the “test” is actually for a protein that occurs in millions of people* called “P24.” (and who knows, maybe all humans).

But at the Daily Mail, they think it’s gangbusters.

“Colour-coded blood test that turns blue if you have HIV is 10 times more sensitive than current methods” blares the headline, ignoring all reality.

Yes! The test turns BLUE! Like a sexual organ squeezed too hard, too long. Or, something like that. But, what does the test test for?

After lying to the public about the nature of “HIV” and “AIDS,” they admit that:

“The new sensor works by testing serum, a clear watery fluid derived from blood samples, in a disposable container for the presence of an HIV biomarker called p24.”

Ah, P24. “HIV biomarker.” And a “biomarker” for .. well, right. Just being alive. No, this protein is not a stand-in for any particular particle at all. Theirs is a synthetically-produced protein blob whose molecular weight is about that of a great deal of the stuff that you produce in your own cells everyday – especially if you have any gut-related illness (see ‘gut related immune deficiency‘ and learn about fixing your intestines).

And, in the standard medical literature, you can see how rarely or often it shows up in people who are and who aren’t supposed to have it, if you want to bother with the details. (ahem. Daily Mail. Hello?)

Right. Not them, but you. Coming soon to your gay or poor neighborhood – new tests! Because, as always:

The mainstream is trying to kill you.

Or, have it your way – they just don’t know any better. Is it that the pod people who write this crap are bleeding idiots who can’t figure out how to do a cross-referencing or fact-check on an article? Or, is it that the purpose of mainstream, brainwash-the-masses media is to lie to you?

Read and comment on their propaganda/advertisement at: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2224772/HIV-Aids-British-scientists-create-ultra-sensitive-HIV-test-turns-blue-virus-present.html

 

Read the hidden history and real causes of what was AIDS in the gay community, versus AIDS in Africa – and understand the myth of HIV and HIV testing – in Chapter Six of “Official Stories,” by your narrator, Liam Scheff.

Amazon US

Amazon UK

Sex and the Soul – the Origins of the HIV Myth

by Liam Scheff

If HIV is a hoax (if HIV tests do not test for any particular thing – and they don’t, and you can look that up), and “infection” is based on this non-test – then HIV tests don’t have any clinical meaning.

We’re also told that you can “have” “HIV” and not know it. But, have you ever had an STD and not known it?? A sexually-transmitted yeast infection, herpetic infection, or any other sore or pimple in your groin – and “not known it?” (How did they sell us this garbage?)

And that’s their line – the tests don’t test for anything, and you’ll never know, unless you trust the test. It’s a very religious run-around.

But, we assign them great value. Why?

I think it’s because of what they represent in terms of human myth, and ancient law. It used to be that when two people co-joined in sex, it was understood that they were communing their ‘souls.’ In the modern, secular age, the idea of a ‘soul,’ is treated as so much mystical nonsense, so that when two people are entirely intimate with each other, we don’t talk about it as an ‘exchange of soul energy’ or ‘divinity,’ but as ‘recreational sex,’ or, ‘a good time.’

I think this leaves us, culturally, feeling abused, washed out, empty, and wanting…needing. I think the larger mythical mind of the species grabbed onto the idea of this thing that can’t be tested for – but must exist. This thing that is communicated, “infected” from person to person in love-making… something which is now permanently part of you. Something ‘wily, indecipherable.’ Something nearly spiritual – but not.

It’s the communing of souls in a negative aspect – because we don’t allow that that’s what sex is (two souls sharing at a deeply energetic level with each other), we need a ‘scientific’ or reductionist myth to sit in place – in the very footprints – of the old one.

We don’t value sex; we don’t value intimacy. We don’t, as a culture, value the ‘energetic,’ or the soul. We give ourselves away too easily. We feel abused, and used, even by our own actions. We seek to be comforted through ‘confession’ (HIV testing) that we’re not permanently damaged.

Instead of understanding the truth: Every interaction at that level of intimacy is significant, and leaves us in a position of having inherited from one person a quantity of their being; just as we gave a quantity of ours to them. We’ve exchanged soul material. And we are open – extremely open. And extremely vulnerable. We are wanting to commune, gently, lovingly – but we’ve jumped in too quickly, with someone who is not a match for us; or, we’ve seen it as ‘sport,’ and pulled away from intimacy, wounding ourselves in the process.

Is it any wonder that the people who routinely go in for ‘testing’ are people who don’t value intimacy and sex? People with holes in their psyches? The “worried well,” anxious about, well, a great many things, and projecting all anxiety onto one point – that of sexual misconduct?

Is it any wonder that people who are encouraged to go in for testing are people who are seen as overly-sexual, aberrant from the ‘norm,’ who perhaps don’t value intimacy (or aren’t permitted culturally to form long-lasting paired relationships); or who don’t see it as that deeper exchange, but more as ‘sport?’

Again, the myth of “HIV” is that there is some bacteria or ‘retrovirus’ that you can’t see, you don’t know is there, and leaves no mark, does not cause any inflammation on your sexual organs. (Do we really think that real STDs don’t bother your genitals?! How have we bought this incredible lie of the non-STD “STD?”) Because it’s a myth – a metaphor. We need something to remind us that sex is not free, nor should be embarked upon lightly.

–          –          –          –          –          –

I explore the technical and historical origins of the AIDS definition and the totally, heinously bogus “HIV tests” in Chapter Six of my book, “Official Stories.”

Buy Official Stories Online, Ships Worldwide

Amazon.com in the US, UK and Europe.

And will be on Audiobook and Kindle in late 2012

HPV, The Virus That Doesn’t Cause Cancer – New Video – Liam Scheff and Robert Scott Bell at the Health Freedom Expo

Liam Scheff and Robert Scott Bell present “HPV, The Virus that Doesn’t Cause Cancer” at the Health Freedom Expo in March 2012. Liam Scheff, author of Official Stories, presents the history of bad cancer ‘virology’ that led to the rotten ideas infesting science today; a lousy science that gave us “HPV, the virus that does (but doesn’t) cause cancer,” and the idea that every disease of poverty and immune deficiency in poor people is caused by a single particle. And we laugh a bit along the way….

Read more in “Official Stories”

The HIV Innocence Project – Spread the Word

RTB: An important update from the OMSJ

If you have been charged with an HIV-related crime or civil action – or you represent someone in such action, contact OMSJ immediately.

  • In 2008, a Texas court sentenced Willie Campbell to 35 years in prison for spitting at a police officer.
  • A year later, Philippe Padieu faced five to 99 years for having sex with several women. He lucked out with a 25-year sentence.
  • In December 2009, an Arkansas Court sentenced Christopher Gray (18) to 15 years in prison.

These men were sentenced not because they have deadly infectious diseases but because they did not understand how to defend themselves against junk science.

HIV tests do not detect HIV. AIDS drugs cause cancer and kill. Many HIV medications contain drugs like Sustiva (Efavirenz), an undisclosed benzodiazepine (BZD) analogue that compromises immune function after ONE DOSE and can produce life-long psychological and physical injuries.
(More information about HIV drugs and the diseases they cause is found here.)
Continue reading The HIV Innocence Project – Spread the Word

US Government to Ireland: HIV Positivity is Not a Communicable Disease of Public Health Significance

RTB: The US Government admits what HIV test makers have said all along: HIV tests don’t mean a thing (from the Embassy of the United States in Ireland):

NONIMMIGRANT VISAS

Effective January 4, 2010 HIV Infection is Removed from the CDC List of Communicable Diseases of Public Health Significance

On November 2, the Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (HHS/CDC), published a Final Rule in the Federal Register, titled Medical Examination of Aliens – Removal of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Infection from Definition of Communicable Disease of Public Health Significance (HIV Final Rule). This Final Rule amends Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 34, and will remove HIV infection from the list of communicable diseases of public health significance and remove references to HIV from the scope of medical examinations for foreign citizens seeking to travel to the United States. Review the CDC website guidance and Federal Register Final Rule which will go into effect January 4.

Therefore, starting January 4, 2010, HIV infection will no longer be an ineligibility when foreign citizens apply for a visa to travel to the United States. Additionally, HIV testing will no longer be required for medical examinations for visa purposes. Further, applicants who are HIV-positive will no longer require waiver processing by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Review the HIV Questions & Answers to learn more.

Read more about the facts and the fraud of HIV testing.

Thanks to James P.Hogan for this news item.

For Gay Men, Even HIV Negative is HIV Positive

Below please find my 2003 interview with Dr. Dan Cohen, M.D. of Boston’s Fenway HIV/AIDS Clinic. (The interview was part of my research for The AIDS Debate series). You don’t have to guess where the clinic us located – no, not in Newton or Wellesley, home to the beautiful (straight) people. Yes, the clinic sits at the gateway to the beautiful and gentrified South End where a majority of young, urban, successful, working gay men make their homes and living.

The images you see interspersed are not parody ads created for this post – this is the face of Fenway Health’s public relations outreach/propaganda for its community. Talk about targeting a population….

Liam Scheff: What’s the process at the Fenway when someone tests positive for HIV?

Dr. Cohen: When someone is tested positive, they get counseling before and after, regarding the test process, they’re counseled regarding the possibility of getting a false negative when they’re really HIV infected.

Liam Scheff: How do they get a false negative?

Dr. Cohen: The HIV test is testing for antibodies, not for the presence of the HIV virus itself.

Liam Scheff: How does that equal a false negative? Continue reading For Gay Men, Even HIV Negative is HIV Positive