Tag Archives: gay

We Really All Are “HIV Positive.”

by Liam Scheff

We really all are “HIV positive.”Think about it. What does “HIV positive” really mean to people. It means:

1) You’re going to die one day; someday, you don’t know when precisely. But it will happen, and you will be sad.

2) Sex is no longer safe for you, and you have to tell people that you are damaged.

 Well, what’s the news?

We’re all going to die one day; there is nothing anybody can do about that. And sex is dangerous for all of us. And it always has been.

You can break your heart, your soul, give too much, risk too much, give too little, reveal your damages, weaknesses, frailties; get pregnant, get an actual STD.

Of course sex is inherently dangerous. We don’t need a bullsh*t test (that doesn’t test for anything) to figure that out for us.

And we really do all ‘test’ HIV positive, if you don’t dilute the blood samples. Run the blood samples as is, or at a low dilution, and we all have the damned protein/antibody reactions:

“Since all undiluted blood specimens react positive on the ELISA test, a test that supposedly tests for antibodies to HIV, the results presented here suggest that every single human being has HIV antibodies. And this suggests that everybody has been exposed to HIV antigens. ” [Link]

I asked an “AIDS specialist” about this too. Dr. Cohen, who ran or runs the gay men’s clinic in Boston, said the same thing. “We all test positive if you don’t dilute the sample?” I asked. “Yes, that’s the way it works,” he said. [Link]

So, “HIV” is just another way of stating the ancient reality – Life has a time limit, so live it. Don’t sit in front of the TV waiting to die, or to live. And sex is inherently risky. The 60s didn’t change that.

And of course you’ll get sick if you have sex with 30 people a week – or a night – and do drugs all the time. Big freaking surprise.

Wake up AIDS morons. It’s called the human condition.

Does the NIH Want to Kill All Gay Men (or is it Just Tired of Selling AIDS to the General Public)?

by Liam Scheff

The AIDS industry has been so firmly exposed by the work of whistle-blowers, medical activists, scientists, researchers and journalists, it’s more naked than Lady Godiva after a rude haircut; it’s more nude than the Emperor who wore no clothes on the day he decided to really let it all hang out…

It’s more exposed than… well, you get the point.

But thanks to the terrific work of hundreds of individuals to demand transparency in this rotten paradigm, and research and news websites like RTB, Henry Bauer’s excellent site and book, T.I.G. South Africa, The Perth Group, Rethinking AIDS, NotAIDS, ARAS.ca.ab, and more (add yours in comments, please, if I’ve missed it), the truth about AIDS is becoming well known.

And what’s the truth about AIDS? It is this: AIDS is a multi-factorial, complex toxicological immune problem, or series of problems – that has no single cause, and no single viral cause.

HIV is a construct, mostly mental at this point, of loosely-associated laboratory material, cobbled together in academic papers and models; “it” is really a “many,” as in many proteins, genetic strands and loose material that have been associated, in some people, and only some people, with immune deficiency. “HIV” was once called a ‘tumor virus,’ but that it didn’t cause tumors, it was re-labeled a ‘retrovirus,’ but that it had no stable size, shape or form, it passed into being a “Trojan Exosome” – ie, a variety of protein bubbles manufactured in all human cells under stress.

In other words, the variety of things called HIV are made by you, from you, in you, and are most likely cellular messengers. There is no single, identifiable “HIV,” there are only many “HIVs,” none of which eat, screw or chomp on T-Cells. They’re probably more like emails from cell to cell; or perhaps messages to the immune system. Or articles of epigenetic adjustment or ‘evolution’ within the body.

The mainstream got it wrong from the start. They labeled a loose construction of debris as one important thing. They mislabeled the ‘exosomal’ process as a deadly viral process. They mistook what was important as a messaging system for what they were hoping to find – a deadly viral cause of cancer. When these fragments turned out to cause zero and no cancers, the AIDS true-believers simply changed their theory again. “HIV” (all, any, some and whichever), would “kill T-Cells.” This was their theory. And it has been dead from day one.

And so, the mainstream has moved from telling the world that HIV causes AIDS by “directly” killing T-Cells. When they failed to demonstrate anything resembling that theory, they held tight and said that perhaps T-Cells were being “indirectly affected” through unknown means.

The latest incarnation of AIDS theory offers that “HIV” might actually “stimulate” the immune system! Thereby causing…??

But these rotten children cannot publicly let go of their failed theory – or they’ll pay with their careers. And so, they continue to “first do harm,” by drugging all “HIV positives” to death over time, and often quickly.

AIDS, Inc: “Making People Sick is Our Business”

The AIDS lobby and pharma mafia that do their public and very dirty work have driven hundreds of thousands to early graves by drugging them mercilessly with the world’s most toxic ‘Black Box’ prescription drugs. While those who sought treatment through detoxification, a la the Pauling method, updated and improved by Matthias Rath, have been vilified, cursed, and literally wished dead by the very AIDS lobbyists who pin sacred ‘red ribbons’ on everything they do and touch – and sell. But their real interest in AIDS is the following:

“Every death is a victory; every illness ‘proof’ of their cause.”

Nevertheless, they’ve been whittled down from their mount, by public exposure. The recent documentary “House of Numbers” put in living color, at 24 frames per second, the AIDS industry in their own words. And it was a terrible blow for the masters of deceit at the NIH, such as is presided over by ‘Capo’ Anthony Fauci.

And so, what to do, what to do?

They’ve got to find a way to grind it to a halt. And so they are.

The news is now this: “HIV” is preventable, if only gay men will self-suicide all the days of their lives. That is, they must pre-drug with AIDS drugs. Yes, the same deadly “Black Box” drugs will now be taken by perfectly healthy (but deeply paranoid) young gay men. And “AIDS” will be over.

Here is how it reads at the BBC, and all agencies that parrot the propaganda from the NIH machine:

Drug ‘can greatly reduce risk of HIV infection’

Truvada, which is made California-based Gilead Sciences, combines two antiretroviral drugs.

* HIV epidemic ‘halted’, says UN
* Molecule structure hope for HIV

A drug used to treat HIV-positive patients may offer gay and bisexual men some protection against contracting the virus, the authors of a new study say.

What are the drugs? What are the effects? What is “some protection?” Against what, precisely? Testing HIV positive? But HIV tests come up positive for any and every illness. Will this stop “AIDS?” No, real “AIDS” – as in serious toxicological and environmental immune deficiency – will rage on, and Western nations will ignore it.

You can see an early analysis of the AIDS industry’s new move in this paper I researched and wrote a few years ago. It tells the rationale for drugging all neurotic and willing young gay men.

“Does the New York Times Want to Kill Gay Men?” GNN 2006

Here is how they proved their theory that all gay men should be drugged: The good laboratory scientists shoved some laboratory proteins up the rear ends of some macaque monkeys.

Voila.

What does all of it mean? It means that the mainstream is looking for a way out of the big stinking tent they’ve erected. They want to close down the house of death and pain that they’ve locked populations into for three decades. And they need to wave a magic wand to make the population think that there was a real, rational, ‘scientific’ reason that it ended.

Rather than revealing what has happened – the exposure of a fraud – they want to sell one more product.

So, are you buying?

Quitting Drugs Is Not Enough

Some folks who have read my story about quitting AIDS drugs and nearly two dozen other prescription drugs seem to think I attribute my improved health to that choice alone.

It isn’t that simple.

There is no doubt in my mind that taking so many prescription drugs, even under the care of physicians, was damaging me and my health. Quitting them was one essential step–among several–that I had to take just to recover my wits enough to move forward.

Good health, or improving one’s poor health, also requires attention to what we put into our system and how we maintain it. In my case, it also led me to rethink just about everything I thought I knew about medical care and health.

I’m only going to summarize here some highlights of the path I’ve followed to address my seriously declining health. The details and sequence of actions are vague, because each individual’s plan must be customized to fit their needs. Do as much research as possible for yourself (thank goodness for the Internet).

Good alternative or wholistic practitioners can be difficult to find, but may prove invaluable, especially early on. Seek out healers, not just doctors. When dealing with serious illnesses such as cancer, autoimmune disorders (including auto deficiencies), MS, “AIDS”, chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and others, it is important to make significant changes immediately to halt the decline of health. Once recovery is underway there will be time to review and evaluate each of these areas of change to determine which ones should be made permanent.

What follows is based on my personal experience. While it is not intended as medical advice, I do hope some readers might find some valuable suggestions to improve their health. Continue reading Quitting Drugs Is Not Enough