by Liam Scheff
In 1984, the liberals re-invented (or accepted) the old Catholic idea that you could have sex once, turn into a witch, and at some distant point in the future, die (or be killed righteously) because of it.
There would be no specific mark on your body. No visible STD. But suddenly, after a decade, or two, or three, or four, or five – (and never mind the 50 years), “for no reason,” (never mind the heroin, coke, pills, handfuls of drugs, petroleum and benzene in the lube, the 40 partners a week (or night), or the massive antibiotic poisoning) – suddenly – that one episode of sex “got you.”
(It’s very Catholic, this “HIV” thing.)
But HIV tests don’t test for HIV, and they lose in court over and over (and over and over and over and over and over) again. LINK
Gay men, Black preachers and Italianate NIH Priests are all very sure of their need for more funding to fight this thing that can’t be tested for. I think they know, inside, that they’re priests, and that they’re crazy. That they’re wrong. It is a religion for them. LINK
We’re very funky, deep down. Catholic popes and prelates hate that about us. Funky is fun, dancing is freedom. Health doesn’t come from the church (of science, or otherwise).
Do Michael Douglas’s Wife and Girlfriends have Carcinogenic Vaginas?
by Liam Scheff
The internet is popping with reports that Michael Douglas’ love of cunning linguistics caused the throat cancer he underwent radioactive chemotherapy for in 2011. But, is it so? Did this Lothario of legend truly lick cancer from the gleaming thighs of his many mistresses? Or was something else to blame?
Michael Douglas has lived the life of a conquistador. He revels in his civilized excess – booze, cigars, women. He’s listed in the top cigar smokers of all time and pictured on the cover of Cigar Aficionado magazine. Indeed, he is a lifetime smoker and drinker.
The mainstream understands that tobacco and alcohol are toxic poisons; the burning embers of chemically treated tobacco products are irrefutably carcinogenic. Mike therefore has a problem that follows demonstrably from lifestyle choices – from sucking on and drinking carcinogens and cell-deregulating toxins.
But, we’re being asked to ignore reality and look at the invisible, undetectable scapegoat: the “HPV virus.” Continue reading The Deadly Vagina Meme
The Conspiracy Realist versus Conspiracy Theorists! It’s a hot time on the PsoNick Aitchison show (Type 1 Radio Lounge) out of sunny Brighton, England battling out the Judy Woods concept of 9/11. Liam Scheff isn’t buying it – he’s detailed the 9/11 story in “Official Stories” Ch 4. But the crowd battles back with their arguments of energy devises and unknown Tesla machines. It’s a hot, hot, HOT conversation!
The talk then shifts gears to an exploration of the various conspiracy ideas of HIV and AIDS, and Liam weighs in with his 10 years of front-line research into the topic, featured in his book “Official Stories” (Ch 6). Then to Shakespeare, and finally Big Bang (MYTH!) and the Electric Universe (REALITY!)
A great 2 hours on food, sex, reductionism and the HIV myth. The ‘heavy’ topic starts at about 30 minutes.
Have a listen…Cari-Lee of Lifting the Veil and Liam Scheff have some fun!
Incredible show today with Robert Scott Bell and Dr. Rashid Buttar.
Please download and listen to the bonus segment, as Dr. Rashid Buttar, RSB and Liam take apart, for good and all, the HIV myth. No sugar. It’s a great show.
How many needle-pricks from “HIV” patients can a person have an not be “Positive?” How often can you have sex with “HIV” positive people and not turn “positive”
Answer: As many as you’d like, because there is no HIV. There are only HIV tests…
The first hour of the interview will be available here in archives for Aug 20th:
Here’s the 40 minutes of bonus “HIV” breakdown. We even talk Kim Cools and Umlingo Wamangcolosi!
by Liam Scheff
If HIV is a hoax (if HIV tests do not test for any particular thing – and they don’t, and you can look that up), and “infection” is based on this non-test – then HIV tests don’t have any clinical meaning.
We’re also told that you can “have” “HIV” and not know it. But, have you ever had an STD and not known it?? A sexually-transmitted yeast infection, herpetic infection, or any other sore or pimple in your groin – and “not known it?” (How did they sell us this garbage?)
And that’s their line – the tests don’t test for anything, and you’ll never know, unless you trust the test. It’s a very religious run-around.
But, we assign them great value. Why?
I think it’s because of what they represent in terms of human myth, and ancient law. It used to be that when two people co-joined in sex, it was understood that they were communing their ‘souls.’ In the modern, secular age, the idea of a ‘soul,’ is treated as so much mystical nonsense, so that when two people are entirely intimate with each other, we don’t talk about it as an ‘exchange of soul energy’ or ‘divinity,’ but as ‘recreational sex,’ or, ‘a good time.’
I think this leaves us, culturally, feeling abused, washed out, empty, and wanting…needing. I think the larger mythical mind of the species grabbed onto the idea of this thing that can’t be tested for – but must exist. This thing that is communicated, “infected” from person to person in love-making… something which is now permanently part of you. Something ‘wily, indecipherable.’ Something nearly spiritual – but not.
It’s the communing of souls in a negative aspect – because we don’t allow that that’s what sex is (two souls sharing at a deeply energetic level with each other), we need a ‘scientific’ or reductionist myth to sit in place – in the very footprints – of the old one.
We don’t value sex; we don’t value intimacy. We don’t, as a culture, value the ‘energetic,’ or the soul. We give ourselves away too easily. We feel abused, and used, even by our own actions. We seek to be comforted through ‘confession’ (HIV testing) that we’re not permanently damaged.
Instead of understanding the truth: Every interaction at that level of intimacy is significant, and leaves us in a position of having inherited from one person a quantity of their being; just as we gave a quantity of ours to them. We’ve exchanged soul material. And we are open – extremely open. And extremely vulnerable. We are wanting to commune, gently, lovingly – but we’ve jumped in too quickly, with someone who is not a match for us; or, we’ve seen it as ‘sport,’ and pulled away from intimacy, wounding ourselves in the process.
Is it any wonder that the people who routinely go in for ‘testing’ are people who don’t value intimacy and sex? People with holes in their psyches? The “worried well,” anxious about, well, a great many things, and projecting all anxiety onto one point – that of sexual misconduct?
Is it any wonder that people who are encouraged to go in for testing are people who are seen as overly-sexual, aberrant from the ‘norm,’ who perhaps don’t value intimacy (or aren’t permitted culturally to form long-lasting paired relationships); or who don’t see it as that deeper exchange, but more as ‘sport?’
Again, the myth of “HIV” is that there is some bacteria or ‘retrovirus’ that you can’t see, you don’t know is there, and leaves no mark, does not cause any inflammation on your sexual organs. (Do we really think that real STDs don’t bother your genitals?! How have we bought this incredible lie of the non-STD “STD?”) Because it’s a myth – a metaphor. We need something to remind us that sex is not free, nor should be embarked upon lightly.
– – – – – –
I explore the technical and historical origins of the AIDS definition and the totally, heinously bogus “HIV tests” in Chapter Six of my book, “Official Stories.”
And will be on Audiobook and Kindle in late 2012
Liam Scheff and Robert Scott Bell present “HPV, The Virus that Doesn’t Cause Cancer” at the Health Freedom Expo in March 2012. Liam Scheff, author of Official Stories, presents the history of bad cancer ‘virology’ that led to the rotten ideas infesting science today; a lousy science that gave us “HPV, the virus that does (but doesn’t) cause cancer,” and the idea that every disease of poverty and immune deficiency in poor people is caused by a single particle. And we laugh a bit along the way….
Read more in “Official Stories”
A preview of “Official Stories,” from Ch. 8 “Darwin is Dead.” What is Darwinism? What does it actually offer? Is it a science, or a philosophy? We’ll explore the question – and get some hard answers in the book.
Survival of the Fittest
by Liam Scheff, from “Official Stories.”
We have grown up with the expression. We use it when we see someone fail at something so miserably, so spectacularly, that we can only acknowledge the triumph of disaster. It is the phrase that college boys use to mock a fraternity brother who falls down the stairs drunk, or leaps off a hotel balcony into a pool below, hitting the diving board on the way down, breaking some number of bones in the process, having consumed more alcohol than is almost physically possible.
“Survival of the fittest!” The phrase is now commonplace. It has been employed in schoolyards, by scientists and leaders of nations, alike. Its philosophy has been embraced by the likes of Mao Tse Tung, Joseph Stalin and Adolph Hitler. Which should bother people, but doesn’t. So, what does it mean?
Darwin saw that the island finches were different, slightly. Some had longer beaks, some shorter. Some birds were a little taller, larger or smaller, with a little more or less of a wingspan. Some really hated “Sex and the City” while some found it tolerable, though it really described the lives of the gay men who wrote the show more than actual women in New York. I mean, come on, a new guy every week? That’s boy’s town.
Because Darwin had to exclude the idea that things had always been this way and that these changes had been made by magic, or a god or spirit, he had to come up with a naturalistic explanation. And he tried. He called it “natural selection,” which is pretty tricky. Because it turns the old Christian God into “nature,” and makes you think that it didn’t. But almost no one noticed, because they so wanted to get rid of the damned Church, meddling in everybody’s bloody business.
I mean, really. Burnings at the stake, witch-huntings, endless taxation. Scandal after scandal with the clergy. Some of the monasteries were more like jelly-making whorehouses than places of reflection and worship. “Screw them,” said the new scientific elite. “We’ll support the best contender, even if it is a dog.”
And here it is: “Natural selection” and “survival of the fittest.” Let’s unspool it in a little dialog I call, “Define your terms.” Continue reading Official Stories Chapter Excerpt – Survival of the Fittest
RTB: A new film on our friends in London at HEAL
“Oppression Unlimited” is the story of Mike Hersee’s ex-lover, Cornelius Abraham, who died at the young age of 22 years old. His HIV positive diagnosis was just one of the many oppressing obstacles in his life.
Cornelius was born with a heart defect, but was otherwise healthy. His upbringing in a strict Seventh Day Adventist family was difficult as his parents tried to exorcize him and told him that he was going to go to hell for being gay. While dating Mike, he was very psychosomatic and would get sick according to the emotional issues he was having in life. Cornelius was also very dependent in his relationships with people and he quickly became attached to Mike.
Mike had sex as the receiving partner, unprotected, with Cornelius approximately 70 times after Cornelius was diagnosed “HIV Positive,” but Mike’s subsequent HIV test results were negative.
When Mike broke up with Cornelius, it took away Cornelius’s will to live, affecting how Cornelius took care of himself and in Mike’s opinion Cornelius ended up dying of a broken heart (literally, he died of two heart infections).
To view Mike Hersee’s full story, click HERE
Mike Hersee is one of the co-founders of HEAL London. HEAL stands for Health Education AIDS Liason.
Mike became more interested in helping people with HIV and AIDS diagnoses to overcome the stigma and pressures that come with the identity of testing positive.
In the film, Mike Hersee is being played by Brian Rohan and Cornelius Abraham is being played by Irving Green.
Go to www.hivorlive.com to watch the trailer
RTB: HIV tests really do not test for HIV.
The case, closed Tuesday, in Fort Bragg, North Carolina, put a sergeant on trial for “spreading HIV.” But, did he “spread” anything? Except some willing partner’s legs??
Sorry, but. What did he really “spread?” Was he really “HIV positive?”
The answer came from the judge. A potential 37 year prison sentence was reduced to:
Why? Because HIV tests have no standards. they come up positive for EVERYTHING. They have no value, at all.
And the military judge agreed. The Sergeant is free to live his life. He still is stuck with the lousy fake diagnosis. But what value does it have? It doesn’t even hold up in court.
To thank for his defense: The OMSJ, Clark Baker, and the defense team who went to N.C. to ask the experts: “What do you mean by ‘HIV Positive?'”
Read the report at OMSJ.org: http://www.omsj.org/issues/ustd
RTB: A New York City AIDS-Cult experience brought this on…
“Oh, the AIDS ribbon. You still believe in that fairy tale? That people get sick for no reason, because they had sex a twenty or forty years ago? Yeah, that was a good one, they really fooled a lot of people…. you know, they used to convince a lot of people that some of them were witches. They’d drown them in public, and the crowd would say, ‘poor witch, but nothing could be done.'”
by Liam Scheff
Attack of the AIDS cult in NYC. The workers in a Whole Foods store were wearing the red (pity/suicide) ribbon. I said, “What’s that about? Why are you promoting pharma crap?” One fellow said, “We’re raising awareness.”
I said, “for what? For how sex is dangerous? For how some people are sick? How does that help anyone?” He was perplexed. He said he had an uncle who was “pos,” and the drugs were saving him. I said, “The drugs are toxic.” He said, “Yeah, they are, they really are.”
The next day, I said to a truly stupefied girl working there, “Why are you guys wearing those ribbons? You know that the drugs you are promoting are all FDA black box drugs?” She didn’t answer, hardly responded. She then said they were wearing them to support someone in the store who had made them (who was either newly “pos,” or had a friend who was – it wasn’t very clear). She said, “Whatever you think, sir.”
I said, “Whatever I think? You can look it up, if you like. AIDS drugs, black box.”
But she was wearing the ribbon, “raising awareness,” and when I shared my “awareness” with the girl she didn’t want it. The AIDS cult doesn’t want your awareness; they want your stupefied, idiotic pity.
Well, screw that. You raise my awareness, I’ll share it with you.
Here’s what I’ll say from now on: “Oh, the AIDS ribbon. You still believe in that fairy tale? That people get sick for no reason, because they had sex twenty or forty years ago? Yeah, that was a good one, they really fooled a lot of people…. you know, they used to convince a lot of people that some of them were witches. They’d drown them in public, and the crowd would say, ‘poor witch, but nothing could be done.'”
And then I’ll probably get thrown out. But what the hell.
RTB: We don’t even begin to know what to do when the mainstream begins to openly commit public suicide, but cheer.
From PLoS Pathogens, and a cancer research group in Seattle, we now have the following theory:
Have sex with as many HIV positives as possible, to protect you from…yes, that’s right. HIV.
No, you don’t misunderstand. This is what they’re saying:
“Women who have been infected by two different strains of HIV from two different sexual partners – a condition known as HIV superinfection – have more potent antibody responses that block the replication of the virus compared to women who’ve only been infected once.”
Yes. Get “infected” over and over again. Yes, that is what they’re saying. Because the whole thing is a Sham, and always has been.
Do you need them to spell it out for you? They’ve been lying to you for 30 years.
“The study suggests that harboring a mixture of different viral strains may be one way to promote a robust antibody response. The findings also suggest that being infected with two different HIV strains not only leads to a strong response, but also a more rapid response that is capable of recognizing many other HIV strains. “
Yup. So, if you’re going to screw, screw twice. And then you’ll be protected. By antibodies. To something that doesn’t exist.
Hey Anthony Fauci, please, go screw yourself, maybe that will help you become less of a eugenicist.
(Fauci is head of NIH and has destroyed millions of lives worldwide with criminally fraudulent HIV tests, and he’s just one of hundreds of bogus researchers stealing tax money to murder people, with their ignorant ‘consent’ of course.)
Back to the funny papers. I personally have got to get to the “HIV” clinic and find at LEAST two people to have sex with. Because then I’ll be protected. From HIV.
The original article:
SEATTLE – Women who have been infected by two different strains of HIV from two different sexual partners – a condition known as HIV superinfection – have more potent antibody responses that block the replication of the virus compared to women who’ve only been infected once. These findings, by researchers at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, are published online March 29 in PLoS Pathogens.
“We found that women who had been infected twice not only had more potent antibody responses, but some of these women had ‘elite’ antibody activity, meaning that they had a broad and potent ability to neutralize a wide variety of strains of HIV over a sustained period time,” said senior author Julie Overbaugh, Ph.D., a member of the Hutchinson Center’s Human Biology Division. It is estimated that only about 1 percent of people with HIV are so-called “elite neutralizers” who are able to potently neutralize multiple subtypes of the virus.
“Individuals who become superinfected with a second virus from a different partner represent a unique opportunity for studying the antibody response and may provide insights into the process of developing broad neutralizing antibodies that could inform HIV-vaccine design,” she said.
The study suggests that harboring a mixture of different viral strains may be one way to promote a robust antibody response. The findings also suggest that being infected with two different HIV strains not only leads to a strong response, but also a more rapid response that is capable of recognizing many other HIV strains.
The researchers tracked the immune activity of 12 superinfected women from Mombasa, Kenya, over a five-year period and compared each to a control group of three singly infected women. Overbaugh and lead author Valerie Cortez, a doctoral student in her lab, assessed the ability of antibodies present in superinfected and singly infected women to neutralize a spectrum of circulating HIV-1 variants. In doing so they were able to determine whether the presence of two viruses compared to one made a difference in immune response. The researchers controlled for variables such as antibody response prior to superinfection and biomarkers of immunity such as CD4+ T cell count and viral load.
The study found that superinfected women had, on average, 1.68 times more neutralizing antibodies than non-superinfected women, and they scored much higher in their ability to neutralize the virus – superinfected women had 1.46 times greater potency than the singly infected women.
More than 1.1 million Americans are estimated to be living with HIV today, and every nine-and-a-half minutes someone in the U.S. becomes infected, according to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. An HIV vaccine is considered the best approach to long-term protection from HIV infection, but attempts to develop such a vaccine so far have meet with limited success.
“The holy grail of an HIV vaccine is to elicit antibodies to the virus because antibodies have been shown to block virus infection. But there has been little progress in determining how to elicit such antibodies with a vaccine. The study of individuals HIV infected who have developed strong antibody responses to the virus may shed light on the best approach to design a vaccine that will induce an effective immune response,” Overbaugh said. http://www.eurekalert.org/
You heard the man; go get screwing.
Oh, you can contact them, if you want to point out how broken their paradigm is:
Contact: Kristen Woodward
Study finds HIV ‘superinfection’ boosts immune response
Findings may provide insight into HIV-vaccine development
RTB: We’ve seen HIV tests fall apart under scrutiny in court – now we see it in military court, with thanks to the OMSJ.
“Because the case law surrounding HIV was mostly developed at the height of the HIV/AIDS scare 20 years ago, the government’s evidence is usually filled with gaps because it relies upon a variety of assumptions. But the military’s current procedures for supposedly diagnosing people as HIV positive is scientifically, medically, and legally inadequate.”
– Eldon Beck, Captain, USMC, 24 Oct 2011
Two weeks after the Marine Corps dismissed all charges against Corporal RL, his attorney posted this report on the Marine Corps’ Defense Services Organization’s website. These reports are seen by all Marine attorneys worldwide, and its contents will likely be reviewed by all other DoD and military branches.
Captain Beck left no question about OMSJ’s impact in the case:
“Our success in challenging the HIV issues in our case is largely due to Clark Baker (a former Marine, retired LAPD investigator, and licensed CA PI), Baron Coleman (a young civilian lawyer with expertise challenging HIV prosecutions), and other members of Clark’s team at the Office of Medical and Scientific Justice (OMSJ). Without them, we would not have been able to effectively challenge the HIV testing, chain of custody, and alleged diagnosis of our client… You should contact (OMSJ) immediately if you are detailed to an HIV-related case.”
Because of the incompetence that exists within HIV clinics, hospitals and the NIH and CDC, OMSJ is not concerned about sharing it’s investigative strategy with prosecutors or alleged “HIV experts” who are called to testify as prosecution witnesses. In fact, if prosecutors and their witnesses memorize OMSJ’s strategy, they would not file criminal HIV charges against anyone.
Capt. Beck concludes:
“(A)n HIV case is NOT a slam dunk for the government. Get the right HIV experts on your team and you will probably be able to kill the case before trial. If the government is reckless enough to go to trial, you will probably be able to get a strong win for your client.”
Capt. Beck’s complete summary is posted here.
RTB: The OMSJ has gotten over thirty defendants liberated from their “HIV” indictments – by bringing the facts to court, and holding the “experts” to simple honesty and logic.
Step 1: Does anyone “have” HIV? Answer: “No, not based on HIV tests.”
The reality is this – there are no tests for HIV in existence, despite the massive propaganda peddled by the pharmawhores in media and medicine. There are …no tests that find a single, unique particle; these garbage tests react with every disease known to human kind.
When this resilient, repeated, incredibly well-documented and sustained evidence is to be presented at court, the prosecutors buckle, and offer lesser ‘plea agreements,’ so the humiliating and shameful reality of the HIV fraud isn’t paraded before a judge or jury.
In this case, Jason Young would have spent 70 years – the rest of his life – in prison, for being falsely accused of being “HIV positive.” Instead, he’ll walk out of prison in a couple of months. [Link]
HIV testing is an absolute fraud, and an absolute lie. If you know anyone who has been falsely condemned with one of these abysmal tests, please have them contact the OMSJ.