• News
• Reduce the Burden
• Sex
• Tests
• Drugs
• Africa
• Recovery
• Links
• Write for Us

HIV Tests Die On Trial…Again!

RTB: HIV tests really do not test for HIV.

The case, closed Tuesday, in Fort Bragg, North Carolina, put a sergeant on trial for “spreading HIV.” But, did he “spread” anything? Except some willing partner’s legs??

Sorry, but. What did he really “spread?” Was he really “HIV positive?”

The answer came from the judge. A potential 37 year prison sentence was reduced to:

CASE DISMISSED.

Why? Because HIV tests have no standards. they come up positive for EVERYTHING. They have no value, at all.

And the military judge agreed. The Sergeant is free to live his life. He still is stuck with the lousy fake diagnosis. But what value does it have? It doesn’t even hold up in court.

To thank for his defense: The OMSJ, Clark Baker, and the defense team who went to N.C. to ask the experts: “What do you mean by ‘HIV Positive?’”

Read the report at OMSJ.org: http://www.omsj.org/issues/ustd

Poor Witches

RTB: A New York City AIDS-Cult experience brought this on…

“Oh, the AIDS ribbon. You still believe in that fairy tale? That people get sick for no reason, because they had sex a twenty or forty years ago? Yeah, that was a good one, they really fooled a lot of people…. you know, they used to convince a lot of people that some of them were witches. They’d drown them in public, and the crowd would say, ‘poor witch, but nothing could be done.’”

by Liam Scheff

Attack of the AIDS cult in NYC. The workers in a Whole Foods store were wearing the red (pity/suicide) ribbon. I said, “What’s that about? Why are you promoting pharma crap?” One fellow said, “We’re raising awareness.”

I said, “for what? For how sex is dangerous? For how some people are sick? How does that help anyone?” He was perplexed. He said he had an uncle who was “pos,” and the drugs were saving him. I said, “The drugs are toxic.” He said, “Yeah, they are, they really are.”

The next day, I said to a truly stupefied girl working there, “Why are you guys wearing those ribbons? You know that the drugs you are promoting are all FDA black box drugs?” She didn’t answer, hardly responded. She then said they were wearing them to support someone in the store who had made them (who was either newly “pos,” or had a friend who was – it wasn’t very clear). She said, “Whatever you think, sir.”

I said, “Whatever I think? You can look it up, if you like. AIDS drugs, black box.”

But she was wearing the ribbon, “raising awareness,” and when I shared my “awareness” with the girl she didn’t want it. The AIDS cult doesn’t want your awareness; they want your stupefied, idiotic pity.

Well, screw that. You raise my awareness, I’ll share it with you.

Here’s what I’ll say from now on: “Oh, the AIDS ribbon. You still believe in that fairy tale? That people get sick for no reason, because they had sex twenty or forty years ago? Yeah, that was a good one, they really fooled a lot of people…. you know, they used to convince a lot of people that some of them were witches. They’d drown them in public, and the crowd would say, ‘poor witch, but nothing could be done.’”

And then I’ll probably get thrown out. But what the hell.

Screwing More HIV Positives is Good For You, Says AIDS Establishment (Or, What to Wear When the Mainstream Commits Suicide)

RTB: We don’t even begin to know what to do when the mainstream begins to openly commit public suicide, but cheer.

From PLoS Pathogens, and a cancer research group in Seattle, we now have the following theory:

Have sex with as many HIV positives as possible, to protect you from…yes, that’s right. HIV.

No, you don’t misunderstand. This is what they’re saying:

“Women who have been infected by two different strains of HIV from two different sexual partners – a condition known as HIV superinfection – have more potent antibody responses that block the replication of the virus compared to women who’ve only been infected once.”

Yes. Get “infected” over and over again. Yes, that is what they’re saying. Because the whole thing is a Sham, and always has been.

Do you need them to spell it out for you? They’ve been lying to you for 30 years.

“The study suggests that harboring a mixture of different viral strains may be one way to promote a robust antibody response. The findings also suggest that being infected with two different HIV strains not only leads to a strong response, but also a more rapid response that is capable of recognizing many other HIV strains. “

Yup. So, if you’re going to screw, screw twice. And then you’ll be protected. By antibodies. To something that doesn’t exist.

Hey Anthony Fauci, please, go screw yourself, maybe that will help you become less of a eugenicist.

(Fauci is head of NIH and has destroyed millions of lives worldwide with criminally fraudulent HIV tests, and he’s just one of hundreds of bogus researchers stealing tax money to murder people, with their ignorant ‘consent’ of course.)

Back to the funny papers. I personally have got to get to the “HIV” clinic and find at LEAST two people to have sex with. Because then I’ll be protected. From HIV.

The original article:

SEATTLE – Women who have been infected by two different strains of HIV from two different sexual partners – a condition known as HIV superinfection – have more potent antibody responses that block the replication of the virus compared to women who’ve only been infected once. These findings, by researchers at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, are published online March 29 in PLoS Pathogens.

“We found that women who had been infected twice not only had more potent antibody responses, but some of these women had ‘elite’ antibody activity, meaning that they had a broad and potent ability to neutralize a wide variety of strains of HIV over a sustained period time,” said senior author Julie Overbaugh, Ph.D., a member of the Hutchinson Center’s Human Biology Division. It is estimated that only about 1 percent of people with HIV are so-called “elite neutralizers” who are able to potently neutralize multiple subtypes of the virus.

“Individuals who become superinfected with a second virus from a different partner represent a unique opportunity for studying the antibody response and may provide insights into the process of developing broad neutralizing antibodies that could inform HIV-vaccine design,” she said.

The study suggests that harboring a mixture of different viral strains may be one way to promote a robust antibody response. The findings also suggest that being infected with two different HIV strains not only leads to a strong response, but also a more rapid response that is capable of recognizing many other HIV strains.

The researchers tracked the immune activity of 12 superinfected women from Mombasa, Kenya, over a five-year period and compared each to a control group of three singly infected women. Overbaugh and lead author Valerie Cortez, a doctoral student in her lab, assessed the ability of antibodies present in superinfected and singly infected women to neutralize a spectrum of circulating HIV-1 variants. In doing so they were able to determine whether the presence of two viruses compared to one made a difference in immune response. The researchers controlled for variables such as antibody response prior to superinfection and biomarkers of immunity such as CD4+ T cell count and viral load.

The study found that superinfected women had, on average, 1.68 times more neutralizing antibodies than non-superinfected women, and they scored much higher in their ability to neutralize the virus – superinfected women had 1.46 times greater potency than the singly infected women.

More than 1.1 million Americans are estimated to be living with HIV today, and every nine-and-a-half minutes someone in the U.S. becomes infected, according to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. An HIV vaccine is considered the best approach to long-term protection from HIV infection, but attempts to develop such a vaccine so far have meet with limited success.

“The holy grail of an HIV vaccine is to elicit antibodies to the virus because antibodies have been shown to block virus infection. But there has been little progress in determining how to elicit such antibodies with a vaccine. The study of individuals HIV infected who have developed strong antibody responses to the virus may shed light on the best approach to design a vaccine that will induce an effective immune response,” Overbaugh said. http://www.eurekalert.org/

You heard the man; go get screwing.

Oh, you can contact them, if you want to point out how broken their paradigm is:

Contact: Kristen Woodward

kwoodwar@fhcrc.org

206-667-5095

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

Study finds HIV ‘superinfection’ boosts immune response

Findings may provide insight into HIV-vaccine development

Arsenic and Old Lies – Or, An Argument about History

RTB: A letter from the legendary Cal Crilly, turned into an article; quoting heavily from sources, including Mike Baillie, author of “New Light on the Black Death,” Cal weaves together an argument that should attract the interest of those working to eradicate the war against biology, currently being waged by the pharmaceutical juggernaut.

Take it as a counter-argument to the fictions we receive in school, and on PBS.

 

Did Arsenic or other poisonous gases cause the Plague?

by Cal Crilly

Did arsenic cause the plague,was it rats at all, when comets and meteors hit they leave earthquakes and severe earthquakes will release gases and poisons like arsenic.

If there were meteors in the sky they could have hit an area like Kamchatka in Russia so eyewitnesses were few or even volcanoes like Katla exploded in Jan 1311, what else exploded?

Eruption of the large Icelandic volcano happened and there were natural world events of unimaginable destruction.

I love that bananas in 1633 came to the UK, it was the first happy thing in 400 years.

Arsenic causes all the symptoms of Bubonic plaque, add things like possibly Uranium and Lead from the sky at the most pessimistic and we get exposed to these chemicals via breathing and ultimately end up drinking it and eating animals dying from Arsenic too.

And it is horrifying.

Read the rest of this entry »

Return Your HIV Diagnosis Now

RTB: The OMSJ has made it easy for you to turn in your false HIV diagnosis. Please read their article on “Erasing HIV’s Scarlet Letter,” and download the “Differential Diagnosis” forms, linked at OMSJ.org and below.

Erasing HIV’s “SCARLET LETTER” [Link]

1. Your first letter reminds your doctor who you are.  It should contain short questions about a) the tests he used, b) how the diagnosis was made, and c) the kind of response you seek.

If you are asked to come in for a visit, do so – and bring a recording device.  During your visit, turn it on and lay it in plain sight so that both sides will know that the conversation is being recorded.

In some states and countries, it is illegal to secretly record someone.  If the device is sitting in the open, it should not violate any laws.  If you’re not sure, turn it on and say clearly that you are recording your conversation “because what they will say is important and you don’t want to misunderstand anything they’ve said.”  If they refuse, leave the recorder on and re-state that they want the recording device off.  Then leave the clinic, go home and write another letter.

If the doctor happens to respond in writing and identifies the test used, you’ll probably find the test in this list.  If he doesn’t identify it, pick one test, and ask if he used that test.  Mail your certified letter.

Your follow-up letters should ask exactly how he conducted his diagnosis.  He should explain exactly how he ruled out each of the 100+ conditions that are known to “cross-react” to HIV tests – conditions that include flu, tetanus and hepatitis shots, pregnancy, colds, the flu, physical injuries, and so forth.  Your doctor should be able to list ALL OF THE KNOWN CROSS-REACTIONS and explain exactly how he ruled out each one.  If he fails to answer this simple test, it suggests that he did not conduct a competent diagnosis.

Just as a policeman must rule out gunshot wounds, stoke, diabetic shock or other ailments before arresting someone for drunk driving, your doctor must identify and all of the known conditions that cause false positive test results and explain exactly how he ruled them out.

Your objective is to pin down the doctor.  Don’t let him play “hide the penny” with you.

Once you’re satisfied that your first letter and follow-up questions have been answered, move to second letter.

2. Your second letter addresses questions about your CD4 count and flow cytometry.

This is important because the CDC has used a CD4 count of under 200 to identify AIDS cases.  Unless the doctor can describe exactly how the test was conducted, you must assume that the test used was improperly calibrated, was recalled, or was conducted by a lab tech who didn’t know what he was doing.  The fact that both Lab Corp and Quest Diagnostics paid multi-million dollar fines to settle felony complaints should be enough to ask many follow-up questions.

3. Your third letter can ask for a complete list of all of the pharmaceutical reps who visited his clinic in the past decade and how much money, free trips, speaking fees and other payment he received from the drug industry.

4. Use this letter if you are asked to return to the clinic for additional testing.

Because all HIV tests are inaccurate, unreliable and presumptive, taking one or a thousand tests is as unreliable as using one or a thousand broken clocks to verify the time.  Pin down the clinician on the tests that you’ve already taken before wasting your time with new tests.

5. Use this letter and this list to write each of your next letters.

For example, ask him how he ruled out Herpes simplex, and if he knew that the virus is known to cross-react with HIV tests.

Except for the first letter, the rest can be modified and sent in any order.  At some point, ask for copies of all of your medical records.  If a criminal complaint is ever filed against you, these letters and medical records will likely come in handy.  More likely than not, securing the records early will prevent someone from making changes when you start asking them embarrassing questions.

Use the comments section of this report for questions as a FAQ.

 

Understanding AIDS – A Drug-Borne Illness

Gut Flora, Intestinal Mucosa, Antibiotics and AIDS

Liam Scheff: A Holy Mackerel moment this morning as I received Felix de Fries’ paper on immune suppression as Caused By antibiotics – the antibiotics that were THE CAUSE OF what we think of as early AIDS cases. Holy Mackerel because it’s exactly what we’re working on, because it’s what we’ve been saying, because it’s what happened…and is happening to people taking AIDS drugs. 

Have a look-see, and combine this with the rest of our papers on Recovery from immune deficiency. And remember, AIDS is real, HIV is FAKE.

Study Group AIDS Therapy c/o Felix de Fries Eglistr. 7 CH-8004 Zürich

To those concerned, their doctors and carers. To the media
Zürich, 1st December 2011

Gut Flora, Intestinal Mucosa, Antibiotics and AIDS

by Felix de Fries

New studies on the effects of today’s antibiotics on the intestinal mucosa – with a surface area of the size of a football pitch and where more than 70% of all immune cells are to be found – have shown that they lead to:

- Lasting changes to the composition of gut flora, a reduction in benign bacterial strains which produce compounds for accessing nutritional components, a decrease in the diversity of bacterial strains thus compromising the flexible reaction to infections and the rapid return to a steady state, increased migration of the locally established bacterial strains to other organs where they cause pathogenic effects, (A1)

- Transformations to the genetic structure of individual bacterial strains, (antibiotic resistance), the exchange of resistant genes between bacterial strains and as a result the suppression of benign intestinal bacteria by resistant bacteria, (A2)

- Increased colonization of fungi (Candida albicans) which in the process form roots, change their metabolism and secrete toxins (A3)

- Reduced production of antibodies against foreign bacteria and fungi caused by bacteria and reduced production of toxins with which bacteria in the gut mucosa activate immune cells against viruses, bacteria and parasites. Decrease in the production of the body’s own defense substances against these pathogens and in the process a reduction in defence against infections in the intestines, the mouth, the rectum and the sexual organs, (A4)

- Decrease in production of energy in bacteria and in immune cells via the colonization of receptors on the cell surface, blockage to the membranes of their mitochondria and to protein synthesis in mitochondria, (A5)

- Reduced production of substances for the protective film on the gut mucosa by bacteria and as a result injuries, haemorrhaging and an increased permeability of the epithelium leading to increased contact of immune cells to nutrient particles in the gut mucosa. This causes ongoing inflammations of the gut mucosa which in time overtax the local immune regulation and immune tolerance, together with the dissemination of intestinal bacteria to other organs this finally leads to inflammatory reactions in the whole organism. (A process that can similarly be triggered by cereals containing gluten and foodstuffs with acid-producing or histamine-containing substances), (A6)

Destruction of bacterial strains in the small intestine which trigger the formation of Th17 cells and as a result changes to the balance between Th17 cells and regulating T cells (Treg) which govern the immune tolerance in the intestines, the reactions to inflammations in the gastrointestinal tract and the production of autoreactive antibodies. This after some time leads to a general reduction in T4 helper cells, to chronic intestinal inflammations and to an advanced systematic inflammatory reaction in the whole body. In the process the defence against bacteria, fungi and parasites in the brain, lungs and other organs shuts down. (A7)
New studies on Aids describe the AIDS as being characterized by:

An increased permeability of the gut mucosa and chronic inflammation of the gut mucosa which later spread bacteria from the gastrointestinal tract to other organs throughout the body where they act pathogenically (A8)

A progressional reduction in Th17 cells in favour of regulating T cells (Treg) (in the acute phase the so-called HIV infection) and as a result the reduction of all T cells in the intestinal zone and later in the whole body and thus to an increase in autoreactive, polyclonal antibodies against cytoskeletal proteins, the cell envelope and bacteria (A9)

Representatives of the HIV-AIDS model trace back the reduction in Th17 cells to direct damage of all T cells by the so-called HI retrovirus (and in the quasi analogous model with rhesus monkeys to the SIV lentivirus) that can be activated by the administration of autoreactive antibodies or alcohol, leading to illnesses (A10). There have been no presentations, to date, of how exactly the postulated infectious HI retroviruses attack and destroy T cells. Neither the viral load nor the T4 cell-counts are reliable measured values regarding the course of the disease in test positives. As HIV to this day has not been proven as a retrovirus using the criteria defined by Luc Montagnier et al. it has to be seen as a laboratory phenomenon from which a variety of measured values have been derived (A11) Fluctuations in the so-called viral load are according to the new studies mentioned above indirectly linked to increasing or decreasing intestinal inflammations and permeability of the gut mucosa.

The supporters of the HIV/AIDS model do not wish to accept that a progressive transformation of the gut flora and damage of the gut mucosa from repeated administration of antibiotics could be responsible for the reduction of Th17 cells and as a result in all T cells and thus for chronic systematic inflammation in the intestines and later throughout the whole body.

Antibiotic specialists like Geoffrey Canon and Jeffrey A. Fisher and MDs such as Robert Root-Bernstein and Heinrich Kremer had already since the 80s suggested the connection between extensive administration of antibiotics on selected patient groups (male homosexuals, intravenous drug users, promiscuous swingers) and AIDS (A12) and correspondingly advocated a limited, targeted administration of antibiotics for these patient groups together with immune system supportive, probiotic therapy for the recovery of the immune system after administration of antibiotics. As diverse studies have shown (A13) the immune cells can be activated by the administration of probiotics and immunomodulative substances and excessive immune reactions corrected so that defence capacities against bacterial, viral or parasitic infections can be re-established.

Sexually transmitted diseases (chlamydia, syphilis, gonorrhea, herpes genitalis, granuloma, urethritis, trachomatis, bacterial vaginosis etc.) which are considered as generators for so- called HIV infections and seroconversion in the HIV antibody tests have been treated for years with diverse available antibiotics (A14) and today, despite continuous appeals by the WHO for limited use of antibiotics, an increasing number of the pathogens occurring (e.g. Neisseria gonorrhoeae) are resistant to various classes of antibiotics making successful treatment of these diseases increasingly difficult (A15). Also pathogens of endemic diseases in developing countries such as tuberculosis, candidiasis, cryptococcosis, toxoplasmosis, mycobacterium avium, herpes simplex, leishmania or salmonella septicaemia, all of which are treated with antibiotics are increasingly resistant to specific antibiotics, making treatment of these diseases that are AIDS-defining after a positive result in HIV tests (A16), extremely difficult (A17). However, targeted information about sexually transmitted diseases to risk groups has lead to a reduction in proliferation which is also reflected in a reduction in the administration of antibiotics.

Although anti-retroviral therapy (ART), as a bacteriostatic, cytotoxic chemotherapy decreased the incidence of sexually transmitted diseases (STD), increased the number of T cells and thus extended the life expectancy of those treated, with ART the appearance of many classic AIDS-defining diseases (Kaposi’s sarcoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia, tuberculosis and cryptococcal meningitis) could not be avoided in any case making necessary the additional administration of antibiotics parallel to ART (A18).

Supporters of the HIV/AIDS model admit now that by means of ART the extent to which the number of Th17 cells and other T cells can be maintained or increased is dependent on the existing damage to the gut flora, the gut mucosa and the spreading of intestinal bacteria throughout the body. They are now studying whether with the administration of probiotics (together with ART or alone) the gut flora can be influenced in such a way as to reduce the permeability of the gut mucosa and the spreading of intestinal bacteria and improving the defence capacities against bacteria and viruses (A19).

The fact, that immune deficiencies underlying disruptions can only be subdued and not treated causally by means of ART does not induce the supporters to fundamentally re-think AIDS therapy. That life expectancy for those treated by ART, even in western countries, is still considerably shorter as for the general population they trace back to ‘non-AIDS-specific’ diseases (liver and kidney failures, cardiovascular diseases, nerve diseases and certain forms of cancer) which they consider to be premature aging processes and not the compulsive results of continuous damage to mitochondria by ART (A20).

Based on today’s knowledge on the effects of antibiotics on the gut flora and the intestinal mucosa and their effect on T cells, in addition to malnutrition (A21), drug consumption, contaminated drinking water and environmental toxins, the expansion of AIDS-defining diseases (at the beginning of the 80s only pneumocystis carinii and Kaposi’s sarcoma and the later many other endemic infectious diseases and later still also TB) has to be traced back to repeated administration of antibiotics (A22) and failure to provide therapy for the re- establishment of gut flora and the gut mucosa after administration of antibiotics and not to the postulated HI retrovirus newly discovered in 1984.

The postulating of a new, immune weakening retrovirus (HIV) transmitted by infection and the construction and introduction of tests that identified an increased titer of autoreactive, polyclonal antibodies against proteins from the cytoskeleton and cell envelope of human cells and bacteria from an arbitrarily set level on as ‘HIV’ positive, served from 1984 onwards above all to deny the shocking ensuing effects of antibiotics and the emerging antibiotics resistance and to hide both of it from the general public. Male homosexuals and other members of risk groups were urged on the evidence of a sexually transmitted, lethal disease to practice less risky sexual behaviors.

According to the accepted paradigm, where infections were only to be treated by the administration of the right antibiotic against the hostile pathogen, many doctors sought a new super antibiotic after the onset of the AIDS crisis which they believed to have found in the form of AZT (and other nucleoside analogs) which were supplements from 1996 by protease inhibitors which could slow down inflammatory reactions by interfering with cell division (also of bacteria). What they do not accept to this day is that through uncontrolled administration of antibiotics, often without precise analysis of the pathogens in labs and through the non-application of probiotic, immune-supporting therapy after antibiotic administration every day new HIV-positives and AIDS patients were created and thus releasing an epidemic of the so-called HIV retrovirus throughout all corners of the world.

How far it is possible to successfully treat damage caused by antibiotic administration to the gut flora and gut mucosa and to other organs as well as infestation by parasites by means of probiotic administration, amino acids, trace elements and vegetable matter (A23) will be decisive for finding out whether AIDS-defining diseases can be successfully treated in the coming years. Provision of sufficient and healthy nutrition, clean water and a probiotic, immune system supporting therapy will represent a central challenge for medical institutions all over the world in the coming years.

That the complications and side effects associated with ART could be reduced by administration of immune system supportive substances was already confirmed in 2002 by a clinical study (A24). Although pharmaceutical companies like Roche and Squibb, thereupon published extensive brochures on supplementary treatment to ART with amino acids, trace elements and vitamins, they had only a little influence on actual treatment of those affected. As health insurance companies do not reimburse patients for such substances – they have to pay for them out of their own pockets, they are not prescribed by doctors – in sharp contrast to ART therapy which including laboratory costs more than 20,000 Euros per patient per year. It will be interesting to see whether this will be the case in the future after the latest insights from AIDS research.

Felix de Fries

Attachments: AIDS and the Mitochondria: http://ummafrapp.de/skandal/felix/mitochond/AIDS_and_the_mitochondria.pdf
Therapy recommendations

References in PDF. [cached]

HIV Test Fraud Liberation Day

by Liam Scheff
for the Robert Scott Bell Show and Natural News

It may come as a shock to realize that if everyone in the world who was supposed to be HIV positive, suddenly no longer cared about this designation, and returned the diagnosis and red ribbon to the doctor or clinician who gave it to them, that no further infections would occur, no HIV would be spread, and the entire notion of this virus would disappear entirely. What would be left in this scenario is not a world plagued by HIV infection, but a world in which many people are ill for many reasons: Poverty, pharmaceutical poisoning, street drug abuse, toxic environmental poisoning, pure starvation, filthy parasite-ridden water and fear. A fear promulgated and propagated by the AIDS medical front.

We on the Robert Scott Bell Show are proud to present a new video documentary release from the “House of Numbers” special edition film series – “HIV Testing Exposed, Revealed and Deconstructed.”

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OajiyoWmKiE
Vimeo: http://vimeo.com/32537863

What are HIV tests? What do they do?

They are protein tests – they look for reactions between proteins in the test kits, and proteins in your blood.

But where do the proteins come from? The answer will astound, and possibly liberate you, and anyone you know who has ever been given one of these fraudulent tests.

In the course of two hours, we hear from AIDS industry and medical experts, who in their own words reveal in no uncertain terms that HIV tests are a complete and utter fraud – a game of three-card-monty, that overlay a cult-like belief system, a myth – the myth that AIDS is a transmissible sex disease.

AIDS – acquired immune deficiency – is real enough, and easy to ‘acquire’ through many means – through drug, pharma, water, food poisoning; through prolonged intoxication with chemicals, or restriction of essential nutrients.

But while immune deficiency is quite real, HIV is entirely fake. Does this statement surprise you? Shock you? In the course of two hours, investigative journalist Liam Scheff, and host Robert Scott Bell will walk you through the experts on parade, as they tell you, in their own words, how the HIV test was constructed out of entirely normal proteins, that occur in both sick and healthy people. These proteins were supposed to come from one virus – but they come from a witch’s brew of cultured, contaminated cell lines in government laboratories, which had been growing for most of the 1970s. They were useless proteins looking for an illness to attach themselves to. Why? To keep the funding going.

The CDC was saved from destitution by the invention of the “HIV” paradigm. The World Health Organization has grown into a world policing, economic weapon of war, in light of their ability to ruin nations with make-believe “HIV” tests, (and the SARS, Bird and Swine flu tests that followed suit). Much of the ‘third world’ has been made into pharma slave states, because we have been given this profoundly effective myth: That sex is dangerous for some people, and so they must be tested.

But what are we testing them with, and what for?

You will hear Hans Gelderblom, electron microscopist, admit on camera that what became HIV tests, was from the beginning, “Eighty Percent Dirt.” You will hear Ph.D. researchers describe the invention (by fiat, and consensus agreement) of “HIV proteins,” out of normally-occuring cellular proteins. And you will hear the high priests of “HIV,” Robert Gallo, Luc Montagnier and their peers, describe HIV tests as entirely flawed Rube Goldberg devices – one leading to another, leading to another, all in an attempt to create an overwhelming conclusion that a dozen useless tests must be more meaningful than just one.

When they know the truth: A dozen times a fraud is an even more profound fraud – and this fraud is now being perpetrated against Africans, Indians, Chinese, Eastern and Western Europeans, South and North Americans, and citizens worldwide, with entirely disgraced ‘rapid tests,’ now used in vans and at folding tables in parking lots, to grab the poorly-educated and hurl them into the pharmaceutical maw.

On World AIDS Day, we at the Robert Scott Bell show declare a worldwide moratorium on HIV testing — you can now download this show, and the House of Numbers exclusive HIV testing video, walk it into your clinician, your doctor, your school, workplace, your CEO or C.O.’s office; bring it to social studies, science and math classes, discourse and debate clubs; post them on your webpage and blogs, burn them onto CDs and MP3 players, and spread the word.

Turn in your HIV test result. Return it to the manufacturer. After all, they’ll tell you in the fine print that it is a ‘diagnosis’ with no value at all. And begin to reclaim your life, sanity, and your sexual identity – it is not the government’s right or responsibility to decide for you how you shall choose a partner, nor how you shall be drugged.

Take this information, and spread the well-described and understood reality of HIV testing: It is an absolute, irredeemable  fraud. And if you are ill, and have any kind of immune deficiency, your challenge is to slowly but concretely educate yourself about the illnesses that plague us in our modern world. Illnesses of toxic exposure, from denatured and chemically altered food, polluted water and air, and chronic exposure to gut-rending pharmaceuticals.

We on the Robert Scott Bell show will continue to talk about how to recover from immune deficiency. It is a challenge for all of us. What we need to do for the innocent victims of the HIV test fraud, is to NULLIFY that false label, and let them have the mental space and sanity to pursue health without being chased by the pharma nightmare that is daily inflicted upon so-called “AIDS patients.”

This is going to be a two hours like no other we’ve done. We will plumb the depths of the HIV testing fraud, and let the mainstream, in their own words, describe it to you, and release you from it.

Join us today at 12pm EST, and then downloadable for your MP3 player, on NaturalNewsRadio.com for World HIV Fraud Day.

And spread the word, by sharing the broadcast and the “House of Numbers” documentary with everyone you know, at every level of professional life in your town, village or burg, wherever you live in the world.

Join us to listen, and later click on the Robert Scott Bell archives link for the show download.

And remember – the power to heal truly is yours. And the power to turn in your HIV diagnosis, belongs to you, today.

Video:

• YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OajiyoWmKiE
• Vimeo: http://vimeo.com/32537863

Websites:

• http://reducetheburden.org
• http://liamscheff.com/the-hiv-aids-investigation/
• http://www.houseofnumbers.com/site/about-house-of-numbers/the-interviewees
• http://www.theperthgroup.com/
• http://reducetheburden.org/
• http://aras.ab.ca/
• http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/index.htm

Articles:

• http://www.theperthgroup.com/OTHER/nihantibodiesshort.html
• www.jpands.org/vol15no1/bauer.pdf
• http://liamscheff.com/2011/11/are-you-a-slave/
• http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/eppretoria.htm
• http://www.primitivism.com/hiv-interview.htm
• http://www.altheal.org/texts/liamscheff.htm

The Mainstream Again Admits – HIV Does Not Exist as a Unique Particle

by Liam Scheff

Dear voyagers of dark and dusky paths; of shattered highways, of broken dreams. Wilkommen!

How good it is to see you in the old haunt, reading the medical journals, looking for clues this Century’s greatest lie (well, since 2001 we’re competing with some whoppers…but).

Have a stroll through this mainstream review of all things retroviral nonsense. This paper provides a basis of understanding the AIDS mess deeply from their point of view (the point of view of bad science in many labs reaching consensus agreement).

So, please read along. Take your time. Take some dramamine, if needed, or ginger tea. Many of the leaps of logic will induce vertigo…

http://www.retrovirology.com/content/6/1/40 [cached]

Understanding AIDS theory goes like this:

A. It is a sexually transmitted particle – Yes or No.

B. It or They Kill T-Cells – Yes or No.

C. It is a Distinct particle with a distinct shape, size, (morphology) and physical characteristic – Yes or No.

(Why? because that’s (supposedly) how infectious particles in the body are supposed to work – like jigsaw puzzle pieces. The need a particular size, and physical features to do their jobs).

For “A”, see Padian, see this: http://reducetheburden.org/?p=206

175 couples. Doing it. In, out, up, down, front, back, six years of study time (plus all that came before): Zero ‘conversions.’ No negs became pos. Why? Because they weren’t shooting drugs – meaning, they didn’t raise their antibody count to a rancorous level, so as to tick off the touchy non-specific antibody tests.

For B?

Easy. See the mainstream’s defense of how they can’t figure out if/how anything is even remotely affecting T-Cells. Read “The Happy Exosome.”

From the inception of the paradigm in 1984, to the present, the answer is the same: “We don’t know, but keep sending money”:

•  “We are still very confused about the mechanisms that lead to CD4 T-cell depletion, but at least now we are confused at a higher level of understanding.” — Dr. Paul Johnson, Harvard Medical School (Balter 1997)

•  “We still do not know how, in vivo, the virus destroys CD4+ T cells…. Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the loss of CD4+ T cells, some of which seem to be diametrically opposed.” — Joseph McCune, immunologist (McCune 2001)

•  “Despite considerable advances in HIV science in the past 20 years, the reason why HIV-1 infection is pathogenic is still debated… There is a general misconception that more is known about HIV-1 than about any other virus and that all of the important issues regarding HIV-1 biology and pathogenesis have been resolved. On the contrary, what we know represents only a thin veneer on the surface of what needs to be known.” — Mario Stevenson, virologist (Nature Medicine 2003)

•  “Twenty-five years into the HIV epidemic, a complete understanding of what drives the decay of CD4 cells – the essential event of HIV disease – is still lacking…. The puzzle of HIV pathogenesis keeps getting more pieces added to it.” — W. Keith Henry, Pablo Tebas, and H. Clifford Lane (Henry 2006)

So, it’s still a “puzzle” to the mainstream. Do T-Cells die when in the presence of “HIV” DNA? (Which is always different!) No. Or, “We’re confused at a much higher level of understanding” is the official answer.

For question C? That’s what this is about…See below. See this – with pictures even. No distinct shape or size.

1. There is no single thing called “HIV” (“it” is never the same, because “it” is a “they” – and they knew it from the start) – The crap we’re finding is “Extremely Variable.”

“Every ‘isolated’ strain was different from the other also when obtained from the same individual but at different times.”

Is that a particle? No, it’s a fishing expedition with genetic re-assembling (later PCR), and culturing techniques. They call different things by one name. Have a glance:

“The ground for the feud was the following. Montagnier sent his first isolate LAV/BRU to Gallo in July of 1983. In May of 1984 Gallo’s coworker Sarngadharan brings one of Gallo’s five HIV strains (HTLV-IIIB) that grew well in a continuous cell line to Montagniers laboratory in Paris. In July of 1984 Montagnier sends Gallo a second sample of LAVBRU since Gallo had complained that the first didn’t grew well at NIH. Gallo then found and reported[33] that HIV was extremely variable; every isolated strain was different from the other also when obtained from the same individual but at different times. “ – Genomic diversity of the acquired immune deficiency syndrome virus HTLV-III: different viruses exhibit greatest divergence in their envelope genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Jul;82(14):4813-7.

Right. Get it? Nothing is ever the same? Even when it’s the same thing?

“Converging lines of research have linked human T-cell lymphotropic virus type III (HTLV-III) to the pathogenesis of the acquired immune deficiency syndrome. A characteristic feature of this virus is its genomic heterogeneity, which occurs to varying degrees in different viral isolates.” – Hahn BH, Gonda MA, Shaw GM, Popovic M, Hoxie JA, Gallo RC, Wong-Staal F.

Right! It’s always different! (Wrong. It’s not the same bloody thing, you bleeping morons). What they’re doing is fishing out different bits of genetic stuff from the ‘redundant’ genome – they used to call it ‘junk DNA,’ now it’s ‘important epi-genetic DNA,’ now it’s “exosomal DNA.”

Here’s how that works: http://reducetheburden.org/?p=2714

2. Highly Variable – Because “HIV” is not a Single Entity. “It” is a “They,” and “They” are HERVS or Now, “Exosomes”:

H-I-V is really H-E-R-V

AIDS researchers have been forced to admit time and again that their “HIV” is morphologically identical to “HIV-like particles” they find in “HIV negative persons.” This is true even though their “HIV” has the bad habit of having no standard size or physical quality – it can be too small or too large, and still be “HIV” to determined true-believing AIDS researchers.

This is why AIDS patients can “suppress” or stop the production of “HIV” by taking Selenium and other pro-methylating micronutrients. Why? Because returning cells to healthy levels of methyl production is good for bringing order back to loose and disordered DNA. Methylation stops or slows the production of these transposable elements. These are mistakenly thought of as “viruses,” but “HIV” is “LAV,” which is and always was human endogenous retroviral expression in stressed and damaged cells.

And this is at least part of the reason why HIV tests are so lousy.* Humans and animals produce HERVs under stress and illness, and so “HIV tests” are really “HERV tests,” and react with proteins produced by people who are suffering from almost any illness, drug abuse, vaccination, or, of course, pregnancy – because HERVs are expressed like wildfire in the placenta. *(The other reason is because Gallo’s HIV test slurry came from so many different people, mixed with so many different chemical and biological elements, it’s really impossible to know what they’re testing for).

Finally, this is why “HIV” (LAV or HTLV) doesn’t kill T-Cells. This has been the central claim of the AIDS paradigm – but it was proven false from the start. Robert Gallo invented the idea of slow T-Cell depletion by a scavenging, ravaging retrovirus in order to package his product with enough fear and anxiety, covered by pseudo-scientific technobabble, so pure belief would make it stick. Gallo sold his mixed cells containing HERVs (or HTLV-III, which was both as functionless and fraudulent as his other “human lymphotropic viruses”) to Abbott Labs. But he sold them in…ready? T-Cells. His “HIV” Grows in T-Cells. It’s called an ‘eternal line’ of production, in T-Cell leukemia. It never dies. Because HERVs don’t kill T-Cells.

Do you know what does cause T-Cells to suffer? De-methylation of DNA by exposure to pharmaceuticals and toxins.

http://liamscheff.com/2010/05/an-onoff-switch-for-retroviruses-can-it-be-that-simple/

3. What Kind of ‘Virus’ is ‘HIV’? It’s as many as they need it to be. A type-C a type-D, etc.

It’s supposed to be a “C.” Or. Well. Here, in Jay Levy’s lab, it’s a “D”:

Isolation of lymphocytopathic retroviruses from San Francisco patients with AIDS.

Levy JA, Hoffman AD, Kramer SM, Landis JA, Shimabukuro JM, Oshiro LS.

Abstract

Infectious retroviruses have been detected in 22 of 45 randomly selected patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) and in other individuals from San Francisco. The AIDS-associated retroviruses (ARV) studied in detail had a type D morphology, Mg2+-dependent reverse transcriptase, and cytopathic effects on lymphocytes. The viruses can be propagated in an established adult human T cell line, HUT-78. They cross-react with antiserum to the lymphadenopathy-associated retrovirus isolated from AIDS patients in France. Antibodies to ARV were found in all 86 AIDS patients and in a high percentage of 88 other homosexual men in San Francisco. This observation indicates the widespread presence of these lymphocytopathic retroviruses and their close association with AIDS.

But for everybody else, it was a “B.” No, a “C.” No. Well… nobody really knew. Or cared.

If they could outsmart themselves, they could certainly outsmart the public.

Let’s Look at the Numbers:

From their mouths to your ears: 22 out of 45 ‘AIDS’ patients have ‘infectious retroviruses.’ Pardon? Where’s the 100 percent correlation for infection? Answer – they don’t care. It’s never to be found.

Where do the proteins come from? They were and are Propagated (grown, made) in an adult HUMAN T-CELL LINE.

What is “HIV” supposed to do?

Kill T-Cells.

Where does the mainstream GROW ‘immortal’ lines of ‘HIV?’

In T-Cells.

Can we all go home now, and get on with our humping?

Back to their numbers…

Antibodies to this ‘specific, never-the-same’ retroid were found in … 86 AIDS patients and in a high percentage of 88 other homosexual men.

Good news. I guess you can find it anywhere…

4. Don’t Worry About “HIV”Bothering Anyone…It’s “Fragile”

“HIV is an enveloped virus and hence fragile. Most certainly they had lost the virus envelope in their purification of the virus.”

You can find the Perth researchers citing AIDS theory originator, Robert Gallo, saying that MOST lose their envelopes AFTER or DURING budding. So it’s all a very, very fragile soup of non-uniform, never-the-same crap. Poor dears! I bet they cried during “Girl, Interrupted.” (I surely did).

“In the same issue of Science where Montagnier and his colleagues published their study Gallo pointed out that “the viral envelope which is required for infectivity is very fragile, it tends to come off when the virus buds from infected cells, thus rendering the particles incapable of infecting new cells”. Because of this Gallo claimed that “cell-to-cell contact may be required for retroviral infection”. — Marx JL. Human T-cell virus linked to AIDS.” Science 1983;220:806-809. http://www.theperthgroup.com/CONTINUUM/epeondjamel.html

 

But, what’s this? A Cure Already! Way back in the Eighties!

Gallo also said, years ago (and this was new to me) that AIDS was curable with ‘chemokines’:

“Gallo brings more than his reputation. He already has several promising projects on the fast track. Last fall, he identified what he called chemokines — naturally occurring molecules that suppress HIV in vitro. These could prove a powerful treatment for AIDS. He’s following up on the vaccine research of Jonas Salk and Daniel Zagury, and trying to develop a “vector vaccine,” one that uses the smallpox virus to deliver particles that might trigger an immune response against HIV. He’s developing a treatment for Kaposi’s sarcoma, the deadly skin cancer seen in many AIDS patients.

Any of these paths could lead to a blockbuster product. “AIDS will soon drive the whole biotechnology field,” Gallo predicts. “It will be worth ten times ten our efforts here.”  http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/vcgallo.htm |  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemokine

Good news, because the redoubtable wikipodium says that they are ‘found in all vertabrates,’ so I guess the spinal column has cured AIDS.

5. HIV Proteins are not HIV Proteins, Are Only Sometimes or Later, or Perhaps Another Time Important (or not), Depending…

In HIV-ology, proteins with numbers (daltons – microscopic weight) are very important. The good news is you can find these “HIV specific proteins” in everybody. In pregnant women, in their children, and certainly in sick people, arthritic, alcoholic, whatever, poor, starving, etc. They occur everywhere, in animals too.

“The French group did not detect gp41 in their immune precipitation studies using purified LAV. Their inability to detect this protein in their ELISA or immune precipitation experiments is probably the main reason that their positive scores with AIDS and pre-AIDS sera were so low.”

Hey, isn’t ‘gp41′ the capo da tutti of all HIV proteins? But, well. Bah. Besides p24, which shows up everywhere. So. You know. Screw it, sure it’s important. But, you know, we don’t want to be anal-retentive!

Nope, You don’t have to find any “HIV” proteins in “HIV.” Monty found a p25, not a p24 (but I’m sure that was just an accounting error); and he didn’t find any very important p41…

And what’s this: “Scores were so low?” This means, yes, the tests SUCK.

6. HIV Occurs in SOME AIDS Patients…

Or, really “reverse transcriptase” occurs in some, or alot of AIDS, and also non-AIDS patients. Because when they say, “HIV,” they mean, “We found this enzyme, and we’ll say it’s a virus. We know it’s not, but you’re never going to figure that out.”

Reverse Transcriptase is an enzyme process, (many enzymes) which ‘copy’ material from RNA to DNA.

They used to think this “backward copying” was a big deal, because it contradicted DNA-wonderbrats Watson and Crick, (who were wrong about almost anything, anyway, except they figured out where to put the phosphates – on the inside. Linus Pauling put them on the outside, so he didn’t discover DNA, and they ‘did.’)

The mainstream used to get so excited about RT (reverse transcriptase), that they liked to imagine that it only occurred in Tumor Viruses (which no longer are said to really exist as such, so they were relabeled retroviruses, which are now being rechristened, ‘exosomes.’)

But the HIV quacks spend their time and your dollars looking for RT.

That is, You don’t have to find anything anywhere consistently, as long as the NIH is paying your tab (and you’re spending their (I mean, the taxpayer’s) dough). How many AIDS patients ‘have HTLV/LAV/LAI/HUT9′ etc??

So here you can find RT in….

The 48 HTLV-III isolates [Yes, they don't really mean "isolate," they mean reverse transcriptase] were obtained from -

•    18 of 21 tested patients with unexplained lymphadenopathy and leukopenia, with an inverted T4/T8 lymphocyte ratio (designated pre-AIDS), [No, it was probably not 'unexplained,' it's just not politically correct to talk about poppers]
•    3 of 4 clinically normal mothers of juvenile AIDS patients,
•    3 of 8 juvenile AIDS patients,
•    13 of 43 adult AIDS patients with Kaposis sarcoma,
•    10 of 21 adults AIDS patients with opportunistic infections, and
•    1 of 22 clinically normal homosexual donors.

10 out of 21. 13 out of 43. With their version of “HIV” (reverse transcriptase). And they sell THIS to the public? What a sick bunch of … right. Research dollars are needed to help these poor lab jockeys along.

So, here they’re working on improving HIV tests, because they come up pos for everyone who’s sick in any way, and they want the protein reactions to focus on the drug addicts and gay men:

In a second accompanying paper…The number of sera that gave positive scores in the ELISA were:

•    43 of 49 (88%) of patients with AIDS (two of whom had developed AIDS after blood transfusion)
•    11 of 14 patients with pre-AIDS, ["I am your doctor. I regret to inform you that you have....Pre-AIDS... You'll have to wear a condom on your face, because HTLV-iii is very fragile, and you don't want to break it, do you?"]
•    3 of 5 intravenous drug users (of which one positive ways also homosexual),
•    6 of 17 homosexual men.
•     Out of 186 controls only one scored positive in the ELISA (1 of the 164 normal subjects).  ["Normal subjects," ie, not drug addicts. Here they're getting better at gearing the tests to people with drug and other-related antibody production]

Pretty good, huh? They’re getting the tests to work a liiiiitttle better on sick people. 88% of their AIDS patients now click the tests. Impressive. You’ve just identified that 88% of the people are sick. And also everybody else.

Now, here are retro-antibodies showing up in all immune illness:

•    ”The controls also included 3 patients with hepatitis B virus infection, 1 with rheumatoid arthritis, 6 with systemic lupus erythematosus, 4 with acute mononucleosis, and 8 patients with lymphatic leukemias.Of the latter some were positive for HTLV-I.”

Wow! More people are ‘positive’ for more fake retroviruses, based on a finding of non-specific antibodies and reverse transcriptase…

How’s this for an hypothesis:

Sick people produce more retroviral proteins and reverse transcriptase than very healthy people. As do pregnant women, drug users (file under ‘sick,’), people starving to death and riddled with parasites (see ‘sick people’), and, well. You get the gist.

7. HIV Proteins Can Be Added to the Consensus at Any Time, if Someone Important Says So.

The mainstream worked in waves, with different cell cultures, different cancer T-Cells, different labs. They all got different results.

They welded them together to create a consensus idea of “HIV”.

“None of these 22 control patients scored positive in the ELISA or Western blot. Of note, in Western blot the antigen most prominently and commonly detected among all of the sera from AIDS patients had a molecular weight of 41,000 (now designated gp41).

It was presumed that this is a virus envelope protein (which later turned out to be correct). Others, including myself, have later confirmed that gp41 is extremely reactive in ELISA of sera from HIV infected individuals. In fact we have found that an ELISA having as only antigen a peptide with the amino acids GKLICT, representing an epitope of gp41, reacts positively with the majority of sera from HIV infected individuals.”

It was presumed! And so it was. And Don Francis, and Jay Levy, and all the other members of the goon squad made some dollars too, by adding more crap proteins to the mix, that didn’t show up elsewhere. How great for all of them, to find different crap proteins in different people that they all added to the consensus agreement bitch’s brew; that was then sold to Abbott labs, to make fake HIV tests.

Let’s have a holiday in their honor.

———

And we’re back where we started. p41 is important, except when it isn’t. Like in the premiere Nobel-prize winning papers on “LAV” (I mean…HT…L…..whatever, you get the point….

And the proteins get added after the fact, and there’s no there there.

Anyway, read the paper. It’s illuminating, especially in the deep criticisms of Montagnier, the chronic ad hoc additions; the papier mâché  nature of the whole thing… built from failure, from nothing, with each group finding nothing like the previous, and improvising a theory out of it – “HIV.”

Really, improvising:

“We found a ‘new protein’ to your thing; sure you never found it, but that’s science – it’s a mystery!! Let’s add it into the consensus model!”

And extra credit to anyone who wants to figure this one out:

“It is noteworthy that B.R.U.’s serum reacted with 90–100% of the co-cultured cells from B.R.U and the healthy donor since we know that only the CD4 positive cells should be infected. The B.R.U.’s serum also reacted with 90–100% of the HTLV-I producing cells! If this were to be due to a possible double infection with HIV and HTLV-I again only CD4 positive cells should be positive. More likely something unrelated to either HIV or HTLV-I was detected by the B.R.U. serum, in my opinion most probably mycoplasma, a common contaminant in cell culture.”

How cross-contaminated can something be and still be “pure?” And yet it’s still proof..of………..???

“The 0.5 to 2% positive infected umbilical cord lymphocytes may indicate retrovirus-infected cells. However, the lack of reactivity with the p19 and p24 sera with these cells is not a proof that the B.R.U. virus was not HTLV-I. The few percentages of possibly positive cells could simply have been missed with the specific antibodies but detected with the patient’s sera containing antibodies to all viral proteins. The paper does not present any photos of the fluorescent cells.”

They grow their proteins in contaminated cultures – umbilical cells, cancer T-Cells. Which contain…what…?

Anybody? Anybody…

Reverse transcriptase; retroviruses. All the stuff they’re looking for.  They’re always going to find what they’re looking for – which is cellular detritus.

Happy hunting. Interesting paper, most definitely worth reading, especially for the ‘fragile,’ ‘never the same,’ and the list of percentages…

Tina Van Der Maas – AIDS Hero

RTB: We are pleased to present Tine (Tina) van der Maas’ health regimen; it has helped hundreds of Africans suffering the blight of immune deficiency – AIDS – not caused by an invisible single particle, but by prolonged exposure to a toxic, nutrition-starved environment. The more the pharma-petrol cabal tries to diminish her accomplishments, the more they will shine.

Tine’s wellness programme

Tina van der Maas has been the driving force behind former South African health minister Dr. Manto Thshabalala Msimang’s lemon, olive, garlic, ginger and beetroot programme.
This has been belittled and vilified by a chorus of either totally uninformed or malicious members of the press and of course the paid sycophants of the petrochemical pharmaceutical cartell, the Treatment Action Campaign (TAC).

Fact is: It works wonders.
I invite you to watch Tina’s documentary about her work with AIDS patients in rural Kwa Zulu Natal. This is really mindblowing and deeply touching.

Tina has achieved total recovery of more than 90% of those cases deemed terminal, meaning people who could not even feed a spoon to their mouth. In cases of “full blown AIDS” where people are just slightly sick and still walk about on their own 2 legs her recovery rate is 99%, fully documented in over 400 cases.
This is in stark contrast to the poor patients who for lack of unbiased information follow the Antiretroviral programme as advocated by the medical establishment.

18% of them are dead after 6 month
The thicket of lies is just so dense, it’s unbelievable.

Read my blogposts on Tina to get a better idea of who she is and what she stands for:

• A real hero – Tina van der Maas
• Five amazing health breakthroughs, five outrageous persecutions
• Another story of healing by Tina v/d Maas

Since the programme flushes the body of toxins and restores health it has also shown great promise with cancer, diabetes and many other systemic diseases.

It is easy to follow and not expensive.
It is an ideal complementary programme to use with zapping and Tina uses our zappers now on all the people she advises and monitors. Cutting out the sugar and starch foods together with the extreme immune boost you get from following this programme, you get rid of your chronic candida

The following has been compiled by Tine v/d Maas herself for your perusal:

 

BASIC NUTRITIONAL WELLNESS PROGRAM

This basic Wellness Program can be used when suffering from any (chronic) disease as it detoxifies the body and restores the biochemistry of the body, so the body has the tools to repair itself. It can also be used to maintain health and well being.

Key to the Wellness Program is the lemon and olive oil mixture, which detoxifies the body, assists the liver to function properly, and helps to get the ph of the body back to normal in the shortest of time. People who are not well have usually an acid body, which means the ph of the urine is below 7. For optimal health a healthy person’s ph should be between 7.1 and 7.3. When you have cancer, your ph should be 7.5 or above, as than any cancer stops growing, which gives you time to get rid of the cancer. You can buy urine strips to test your urine yourself in SA at Dischem or any good pharmacy.

To make 1 portion of the lemon / olive oil mixture:

1. Soak the lemon for about 10 minutes in water with some vinegar added
2. Cut the lemon in pieces and put it in the blender
3. Add 1 tablespoon of Extra Virgin Olive oil and 1 cup of water
4. Blend
5. If you do not have a blender, soak the lemon as above, grate the lemon and put it in a container, and add the water and the Extra Virgin Olive oil
6. So you are using the WHOLE lemon, the peel, the white, the flesh, the juice and the pips!

When you are sick, you drink 3 portions per day – which means 3 lemons, 3 tablespoons of extra virgin olive oil and 3 cups of water till you are completely symptom free. You can make for 5 days at a time – which means 15 lemons, 15 tablespoons of extra virgin olive oil and 15 cups of water. Keep the mixture in the fridge

Following are the other ingredients you need to take or what to avoid:

Garlic	3 Tablespoons per day: 1 in the morning, 1 in the afternoon, 1 in the evening
Ginger	As above
Beetroot	2 large beets or 4 small beets
Brazil nuts	Eat 2 per day at least, more if you are sick
Pumpkin seeds	At least 1 tablespoon per day
Lemon / olive oil mixture	3 portions per day: 1 in the morning, 1 in the afternoon, 1 in the evening
Multivitamin	In SA, a good one to use is the multivitamin from Bioharmony available at Dischem, Clicks and Health shops. In the rest of the world, Dr Mercola (USA), Jon Barron (USA), Patrick Holfordt (UK) and Solgar produce good supplements. Take twice the recommended dosage when very sick
Fruit and vegetables	As much as you want, especially what is in season in your country
Eggs	When ph is in the normal range, 1 soft boiled egg per day
Chicken or fish	Only when your ph is in the normal range, or if you have cancer, when your ph is above 7.5
Exercise, fresh air and sunshine	Do some fun exercise like dancing or brisk walking at least 4x per week. Keep your windows open, even at night when it is cold. Spend at least ½ hour per day in the sun. If living in a climate where the sun “disappears” during winter, take at 1 tablespoon of Codliver oil per day
Water	2 liters of water per day. For people with arthritis this is very important. As the acid leaves the joints, you don’t want this acid to form kidney stones
Tea	Herbal teas like Green tea or Rooibos tea
Brown rice	Only once ph is right

YOU SHOULD NOT HAVE THE FOLLOWING TILL YOU ARE SYMPTOM FREE:

 

Beverages	No “normal” tea, no coffee (instant or bean), no alcohol, no juices (even the “natural” ones or the no sugar added ones), no frizzy or gassy drinks, no diet drinks, no milk or yoghurt
Starches	No sugar, no refined foods, no bread, no wheat products, no pasta, no flour, no potatoes, obviously no cakes etc., no diet products
Other food	No red meat till you are healthy, and then eat occasionally “green” meat (from cattle raised organically). Stay away from all processed meats including sausages, and also meat from pork like bacon and ham
Artificial sweeteners	Do not use any of these. They were designed to kill ants, so if you want to get rid of your ants in your garden or house, just sprinkle artificial sweetener powder and the ants will die
Fried Food	Heating oil and frying food make the food and the oil toxic. Avoid especially when sick

This Basic Wellness Program works for most chronic diseases like Diabetes, High Blood Pressure, High Cholesterol, Arthritis, AIDS, Asthma, Epilepsy, stomach ulcers etc. It also helps you to loose weight easily, or in the case of AIDS and some cancer patients to pick up the weight – whatever is needed.

Some diseases need extra things either to do or to take:

 

Diabetes	If you really crave sugar, add Chromium (which is a supplement) for a month or so
Epilepsy	Add 2 to 3 tablespoons of Hemp oil to your lemon / olive oil mixture every day
Arthritis	Do not forget to drink your 2 liters of water per day
Asthma	Take extra ginger when you feel short of breath. It works as an anti-inflammatory! Do the following breathing exercise a couple of times per day: Breath out, till all is out (bending even over). Breath in on the count of 8, hold your breath for the count of 8, and breath out again, bending over. Singing songs where you have to use up your air is also a good way to do this exercise

You NEVER stop your medication on your own – this is dangerous and stupid. Have yourself monitored every week by a doctor (or a registered nurse who is allowed to adjust your medication) for insulin, high blood pressure medication and cholesterol medication. You will need less medication as you stay on the program till all medication may be stopped. You can reduce medication like painkillers and anti-inflammatory drugs yourself, but for example cortisone or steroids (often prescribed for arthritis and asthma are drugs you have to be weaned of, depending how long you have been on it. Although you will not need your asthma pump anymore, keep it with you till you know for sure you will not need it anymore. Don’t just throw it out when you have not used it for a week or two.

Once you are well, you can reduce everything to twice per day. Keep on monitoring your ph so it stays in the normal range, and than you can reduce everything to once per day. You will notice that when for example you have eaten many things you should normally avoid, like cakes, puddings and meat, your ph may drop and you may feel sluggish the next day. Just for one or two days take again 3 portions of everything, so you can get all the junk quickly out of your body. Do not see this as a diet but a lifestyle change. The saying “You are what you eat” is so true. You eat junk, you become diseased!

Many people develop shingles when they are sick. To get rid of the pain shingles (herpes) or chickenpox cause mix the following: 1 Tablespoon of Aquas cream, 1 tablespoon of lemon juice and 1 Disprin or Asprin. If the area is big, mix more accordingly. Apply thickly on the affected area with cotton wool (never touch oozing blisters with your bare hands) and only put clothes back on when it has been absorbed. Wear cotton clothes as synthetic material can irritate the skin. Apply again 4 hours later, and again the next day. With chickenpox apply as needed for a couple of days. The pain is usually gone within a couple of hours. When you had shingles and the blisters have disappeared, but the pain is still there, the cream mixture will take a bit longer to work – usually about 24 hours. Avoid peanuts or peanut butter as they can trigger shingles. Go on the Wellness Program as above. The reason you got shingles is because your body is taking strain, just like you can get fever blisters when you have the flu or a cold. The Wellness program will bring your body back to balance.

When you have eaten something that makes you feel nauseas, or causes you to vomit or have diarrhea just take 2 tablespoons of activated charcoal every 2 hours till it has stopped. You can also grind some burned wood or plain charcoal into a powder and take that.

We advise on many other diseases like Lupus, cancers, autism, strokes, heart, emphysema, etc. The basic Wellness Program is than still used but with other things added. You can e-mail me to find out what to add. If there is a big demand for this information, we may also put this on the website.

You can watch our DVD we have made of patients recovering from various diseases over a period of time on www.youtube.com/Alunine

You can contact me at tinevandermaas@gmail.com

May the Spirit that is Love be with you and protect you

Tine

HIV Testing is Really Gay!

Breaking News: HIV Tests Do Not Hold Up In Military Court

RTB: We’ve seen HIV tests fall apart under scrutiny in court – now we see it in military court, with thanks to the OMSJ.

by OMSJ

Breaking News: HIV Tests Do Not Hold Up In Court

RTB: The OMSJ has gotten over thirty defendants liberated from their “HIV” indictments – by bringing the facts to court, and holding the “experts” to simple honesty and logic.

Step 1: Does anyone “have” HIV? Answer: “No, not based on HIV tests.”

The reality is this – there are no tests for HIV in existence, despite the massive propaganda peddled by the pharmawhores in media and medicine. There are …no tests that find a single, unique particle; these garbage tests react with every disease known to human kind.

When this resilient, repeated, incredibly well-documented and sustained evidence is to be presented at court, the prosecutors buckle, and offer lesser ‘plea agreements,’ so the humiliating and shameful reality of the HIV fraud isn’t paraded before a judge or jury.

In this case, Jason Young would have spent 70 years – the rest of his life – in prison, for being falsely accused of being “HIV positive.” Instead, he’ll walk out of prison in a couple of months. [Link]

HIV testing is an absolute fraud, and an absolute lie. If you know anyone who has been falsely condemned with one of these abysmal tests, please have them contact the OMSJ.

http://www.omsj.org/contact-us
http://www.omsj.org/innocence-group

http://www.omsj.org/corruption/omsj-prevails-in-another-hiv-case

We Really All Are “HIV Positive.”

by Liam Scheff

We really all are “HIV positive.”Think about it. What does “HIV positive” really mean to people. It means:

1) You’re going to die one day; someday, you don’t know when precisely. But it will happen, and you will be sad.

2) Sex is no longer safe for you, and you have to tell people that you are damaged.

 Well, what’s the news?

We’re all going to die one day; there is nothing anybody can do about that. And sex is dangerous for all of us. And it always has been.

You can break your heart, your soul, give too much, risk too much, give too little, reveal your damages, weaknesses, frailties; get pregnant, get an actual STD.

Of course sex is inherently dangerous. We don’t need a bullsh*t test (that doesn’t test for anything) to figure that out for us.

And we really do all ‘test’ HIV positive, if you don’t dilute the blood samples. Run the blood samples as is, or at a low dilution, and we all have the damned protein/antibody reactions:

“Since all undiluted blood specimens react positive on the ELISA test, a test that supposedly tests for antibodies to HIV, the results presented here suggest that every single human being has HIV antibodies. And this suggests that everybody has been exposed to HIV antigens. ” [Link]

I asked an “AIDS specialist” about this too. Dr. Cohen, who ran or runs the gay men’s clinic in Boston, said the same thing. “We all test positive if you don’t dilute the sample?” I asked. “Yes, that’s the way it works,” he said. [Link]

So, “HIV” is just another way of stating the ancient reality – Life has a time limit, so live it. Don’t sit in front of the TV waiting to die, or to live. And sex is inherently risky. The 60s didn’t change that.

And of course you’ll get sick if you have sex with 30 people a week – or a night – and do drugs all the time. Big freaking surprise.

Wake up AIDS morons. It’s called the human condition.

April Boden Reveals Big Pharma’s Plan to Destroy California’s Children

by Liam Scheff

for the Robert Scott Bell Show and Natural News

On Tuesday’s Robert Scott Bell Show (10-10-11) April Boden, vaccine activist, blogger and mother of a vaccine-damaged six-year-old in California, revealed her deeply insightful take on the politics of the two – count them, two – vaccine bills, that were just passed by Governor Jerry “Drug-Fever” Brown.

According to April (http://aydansrecovery.blogspot.com), “The whole thing was entirely calculated. On one hand you have bill AB499 which allows a minor to consent to vaccines without parental knowledge, on the other you have SB946 which is about autism insurance reform.”

These two bills were put to Governor Brown for approval on the same day, a crass calculation says April, as they pit one and the same group of activists – those concerned or mortified by vaccine damages – against each other. The first bill, AB499, allows students in public schools – and minors all over the pharma-crazed State of California – to be given drugs for any presumed sexually transmitted disease, including the Gardasil vaccine injection.
Read the rest of this entry »

This site is optimized for firefox | Copyright reducetheburden.org