Attack of the FDA – Robert Scott Bell Exclusive!
They came for our tryptophan, and I said nothing…
They came for our ephedra, and I said nothing…
They came for our vitamin B, and I said nothing…
Part 1:
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Part 2:
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Part 3:
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
The FDA is coming for you – and every natural remedy you trust and have relied on for years and decades! What can you do to stop it? Listen to Robert Scott Bell on the fight to protect Liberty and Freedom of Choice in health care!
Infanticide in African AIDS Clinics?
RTB: What is troubling Africans – HIV or Malaria and Poverty? What are the results of excluding non-HIV positive children from medical treatment? This hidden camera interview in Uganda tells the story. This interview shows a reality you’ll never see in the Western press.
Investigating Infanticide – Mildmay AIDS Centre, Uganda Part 1:
This video has been temporarily removed, to protect the identity and rights of the interviewee.
Do Anti-Retroviral Drugs Save Lives?
Dr. David Rasnick tells the unauthorized version of the “life-saving AIDS drug” story. Good complimentary reading is the patients-seeking-help pages at theBody.com [Here and Here].
RTB’s view: If you want these drugs, you should be permitted to take them. If you do not, you should be permitted to refuse, without bias or prejudice, and certainly not by force, as is done now with small children and teens [Here].
Exclusive: A Gut Instinct about AIDS
By Russell Schoch
An RTB Exclusive
- Probiotics: A Missing Link?
Image Credit: Dalhousie University
Tony Lance’s experience of the AIDS era has made him feel increasingly lonely and isolated. In the late 1980s and early 1990s, like many gay men, he performed the sad New Year’s Day ritual of crossing out names in his address book of friends who had died of AIDS. “Some were acquaintances, others were guys I knew pretty well; but some were dear friends whom I loved like brothers and whose absence I still feel today,” the 49-year-old Lance said in a recent interview.
Lance witnessed the shocking transformations his friends went through. “These were strong, vibrant men turned in a matter of months into ghoulish caricatures of what they used to be,” he recalls. “Their hair turned grey, their skin turned a purplish color, their gums receded and their teeth fell out; they lost weight; and some couldn’t leave the house because of uncontrollable diarrhea. They were told that all this was a result of infection by HIV and that if they didn’t take this medicine AZT, it would be worse. What an awful choice!”
But to Lance, another possibility seemed apparent: it was the medicine that was making these men sick unto death. “The timing was so obvious—once they started taking the drugs, they started getting sick. I saw this happen from the late 1980s, when AZT was first prescribed. When you see that over and over again, it makes a deep impression.”
AIDS Industry Scores a Win: Fear, Shame and Guilt Taint Once Happy Practices of Chinese Prostitution
by Liam Scheff
From China, home of the current push in the ‘scare people to death with the AIDS diagnosis‘ racket:
Many of them who have symptoms live in a self-imposed exile, avoiding family members and public places because they are afraid of spreading the disease.
“I joined the chat room because I was sure I had been infected with this virus,” one patient said. He said he started to feel ill several months ago after a visit to a prostitute where he said he took precautions to avoid catching HIV.
“Twenty-four hours later I had a strong desire to vomit. I had headaches, I was dizzy, I could feel my internal organs were swelling up. I was in intense pain. This lasted months.”
Clearly the man had…you know… “it.” Right? I mean, aren’t those the symptoms? Immediate thoughts of death and intense pain after sex?
(No…not really. There are no specific symptoms). Anyway, turns out he tested negative.
Read the rest of this entry »
Retrovirus is the New Black
Retrovirus is the New Black
by Liam Scheff.
Question: What is HIV, and who is more correct, Dr. Peter Duesberg, or the Perth Group (or the mainstream)?
Proposition:
The mainstream, with its ‘one size fits all’ and ’till death do you part’ approach with its lousy tests and lousier drugs, is not correct. They are, however, totally and transparently corrupt.
Dr. Duesberg gets it right on AZT (it’s too toxic for use), and on the idea that HIV is not a pathogenic particle per se, but gets it wrong in identifying “HIV” as “a” particle, or “a” retrovirus. Why is he wrong? Because, as anyone can witness by reviewing the HIV genome databank, “HIV” is actually a name now given to disparate, separable biological/cellular microscopic phenomena, the various proteins and variable areas of strands of embedded DNA culled from experiments, that are, for show purposes stitched together – according to Duesberg’s retroviral model!
The Perth Group gets it right on HIV in the sense that “HIV” as a term used in Gallo and Montagnier’s experiments, does not represent a uniform particle, but rather a collection of fragments, proteins, variable in size and nature, with wide and non-specific affinities for antibodies produced in a dozen dozen diseases and conditions; Perth gets it wrong in saying that “There is no proof for the existence of HIV,”
Because…
Read the rest of this entry »
Testing Wars! A House of Numbers Special
Dr. Claudia Kücherer, of the Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, saves the world from the diabolical confusion of HIV testing…
See more at HouseofNumbers.com.
Super Padian
Quitting Drugs Is Not Enough
Some folks who have read my story about quitting AIDS drugs and nearly two dozen other prescription drugs seem to think I attribute my improved health to that choice alone.
It isn’t that simple.
There is no doubt in my mind that taking so many prescription drugs, even under the care of physicians, was damaging me and my health. Quitting them was one essential step–among several–that I had to take just to recover my wits enough to move forward.
Good health, or improving one’s poor health, also requires attention to what we put into our system and how we maintain it. In my case, it also led me to rethink just about everything I thought I knew about medical care and health.
I’m only going to summarize here some highlights of the path I’ve followed to address my seriously declining health. The details and sequence of actions are vague, because each individual’s plan must be customized to fit their needs. Do as much research as possible for yourself (thank goodness for the Internet).
Good alternative or wholistic practitioners can be difficult to find, but may prove invaluable, especially early on. Seek out healers, not just doctors. When dealing with serious illnesses such as cancer, autoimmune disorders (including auto deficiencies), MS, “AIDS”, chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and others, it is important to make significant changes immediately to halt the decline of health. Once recovery is underway there will be time to review and evaluate each of these areas of change to determine which ones should be made permanent.
What follows is based on my personal experience. While it is not intended as medical advice, I do hope some readers might find some valuable suggestions to improve their health.
Read the rest of this entry »
How Many is Too Many? A Question for John P. Moore, et al.
by Liam Scheff
A public request for the record, for the AIDSTruth.org cadre:
Dr. John P. Moore, Mr. Seth Kalichman, Ms. Jean Bergman, and company:
I have been for years now impressed by the doggedness with which the AIDSTruth group has done everything in its power to bury, hide, obfuscate, libel, slander, and mostly squirrel away from the public, the story of the orphans used in dangerous AIDS drug trials in New York City. Dr. John P. Moore (of the Weill Cornell medical center), together with Ms. Jeanne Bergman (AIDS activist), have made a point of telling the public media, usually through bullying letters, threatening libel, to ignore and bury the story – that the orphans were used to no bad end, and that even though many died, there is nothing to be alarmed about.
It’s all fine, if they say it’s fine. And that’s supposed to be good enough for you, should you care to be concerned about using orphaned children in drug trials.
So, after years of wondering at the lack of humanity in these people, I’ve given up. I simply want to know: How many is too many?
To Moore, Bergman, Kalichman, et al:
1). How many children would have to die in or following a drug trial for to care? For you to be even slightly concerned over the nature of the drugs or trial? Give us a figure – we know the number is greater than 200 out of 532 – which is the number in the case of the New York orphans. Ballpark it for us. 300? 450? All of them? Or, is there no limit to the number of deaths that can be tolerated in an AIDS drug trial in children?
2). How many children having their stomachs cut open would be too many? Stomachs cut open to facilitate a plastic tube, through which drugs are pumped, and cannot be refused? What percentage is just ‘too much’ in your estimation?
3). How many buffalo humps, and breasts on boys from Protease Inhibitors would be too much for you to think “okay?”
4). How many uncounted ‘adverse effects’ would be too many to cover up in Uganda?
5). How many toxic FDA Black Box labeled drugs given to a four year old child at one time, at higher than normal doses, would be too many? More than 7 – we know that already. So, name it.
HOW MANY IS TOO MANY?
Please do, fill in the blanks, so the rest of us know what we’re dealing with.
Just wondering, since nothing seems to have any effect on any of you, as long as it bears the word “NIH approved.”
Regards,
Liam Scheff